Microbial Aggregation and Degradation of Phytoplankton-Derived Detritus in Seawater. 11. Microbial Metabolism

Microbial Aggregation and Degradation of Phytoplankton-Derived Detritus in Seawater. 11. Microbial Metabolism

MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 42: 89-95, 1988 PubYished January 4 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. I I Microbial aggregation and degradation of phytoplankton-derived detritus in seawater. 11. Microbial metabolism Bopaiah A. Biddanda* Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA ABSTRACT. Detritus was generated from 3 different phytoplankton sources and kept in suspension in natural seawater. Rate and efficiency of mineralization to CO2 of both dissolved and particulate fractions and conversion to microbial biomass was estimated by the 'switching substrate' technique. There was a regular process of aggregation and disaggregahon of parhculate organlc matter associated with m~crobialutihzatlon of the detritus. Approximately half the carbon in both the dissolved and particulate fractions of the detritus was processed by the microbial community in about 2 wk at 26°C. The natural microbial community appears to be capable of utilizing both the dissolved and parbculate organlc carbon in the detritus equally well, when available, enabhng the rapid circulat~onof nutnents and energy withn the mixed layer. While the relative importance of the dual role of the microbial loop as a carbon mineralizer or as a carbon incorporator may vary, the cumulative effect 1s probably always significant in terms of control over nutrient flow to the autotrophs or carbon flow to the heterotrophs. INTRODUCTION both in natural samples of seawater and in culture experiments, that there is a regular process of aggrega- The fact that bacteria can utilize a large fraction of tion of organic matter associated with bacterial utiliza- the primary production in the sea is beginning to be tion of particulate substrates (Biddanda 1985, 1986). widely accepted (Azam & Ammerman 1984, Williams There have also been a number of reports on the 1984). In marine ecosystems, a substantial fraction of decomposition of phytoplankton (Waksman & Carey photosynthetically produced organic matter may 1935, Grill & hchards 1964, Otsuki & Hanya 1972, become available for heterotrophs through extracellu- Miyosh 1976, Cole & Likens 1979, Newel1 et al. 1981, lar production, death, fragmentation and partial Cole et al. 1984, Newell & Linley 1984, Fukami et al. decomposition (Mann 1973, Field et al. 1977, Fenchel 1985a, b), macroalgae (Waksman & Carey 1935, Linley 1987). Further, the microheterotrophic community of et al. 1981, Robinson et al. 1982), and salt marsh grass the sea has demonstrated the potential to colonize (Gosselink & firby 1974, Newell et al. 1983). While rapidly and utilize available detritus and to undergo these studies have provided us with valuable basic characteristic growth as well as succession at such information on the processes involved, their rates and resource loci (Azam & Ammerman 1984, Biddanda & the factors that control them, there are still questions Pomeroy 1988 [preceding article]).Goldman (1984) has that remain unanswered. further emphasized the point that was earlier made by Since most particulate matter in the sea is ultimately Wangersky (1977), that nutrient regeneration in the phytoplankton-derived, living as well as dead phyto- ocean is most efficient where surfaces exist. This is plankton are likely to be important loci for mi- because bacteria utilize only dissolved materials, and croheterotrophic activity in the sea (Bell & Mitchell these are produced at discrete particulate loci In the 1972, Biddanda & Pomeroy 1988). Such sites may con- marine environment. In earlier studies, it was shown, stitute points of rapid microheterotrophic biomass pro- duction as well as nutrient regeneration. In this context, the events immediately following the death of episodic ' Present address: Alfred Wegener Inshtute for Polar and h4anne Research, D-2850 Bremerhaven, Federal Republic of blooms of phytoplankton in the marine environment Germany may be of significant importance to the carbon-energy O Inter-Research/Printed in F. R. Germany 90 Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 42: 89-95, 1988 economy of pelagic systems (Fenchel 1987). If we study WQT COLD this issue under conditions where metabolism of both SODIUM BEARBONATE DUPLICATE COLD CULTURE the &ssolved and particulate fractions of the detritus are examined at the same time at their natural concen- trations, then it would perhaps give us a better descrip- tion of the heterotrophic rate processes as well as an estimate of particle residence time in the water column. Phytoplankton culture Phytoplankton culture flask flask I therefore ask the question: What is the relative utiliza- tion of dssolved and particulate substrates in the phy- C l toplankton detritus by the microbial community? In an Centrifuge at 20000 rpm - attempt to answer this question, I have used detritus from 3 different phytoplankters and employed an SWITCHING experimental procedure that allows the simultaneous and separate measurement of uhlization of both the POC* dissolved and particulate fractions. 10 ml seawater SUBSTRATES MATERIALS AND METHODS Three phytoplankters from diverse taxonomic groups POC' + DOC POC + DOC' in axenic culture were used in the experimental inves- Kept in suspension at 26°C in dark on a reciprocal shaker tigation of this question; Synechococcus sp. (non-colo- nial cyanobacteria), Dunaliella sp. (autotrophic fla- I I I C C gellate), and Cylindrotheca fusiformis (pennate dia- C m tom). A detailed experimental design was developed (Fig. l),based on previous work by Iturriaga & Hoppe VBBw, 888~~1 (1977) and Ishikawa & Nishimura (1983), which allows CO wicks in scint. fluid. Slides for microbes 2 one to follow the fate of detritus in terms of either particulate or dissolved organic carbon while both frac- Fig. 1. Schematic flow chart of the substrate switching tech- tions are simultaneously present. nique. ' Indicates the raholabeled fraction Duplicate phytoplankton cultures were grown axeni- cally in a clean room. One of them was labelled with 14C-sodium bicarbonate (l yCi ml-' of culture) and 26°C and gently shaken on a reciprokal shaker. At equilibrated for 14 d to ensure uniform and optimal various intervals, triplicate microcosms were recovered labeling of the photosynthates. Both cultures were to determine mineralization of substrates by trapping freeze-heat lulled (-20 and 50°C), the remaining dls- the 14C02evolved onto wicks wetted with 0.2 m1 beta- solved inorganic carbon purged (with alternate 15 min phenethylamine, following acidification of the sea- bubblings with CO2 and air), and centrifuged. Then water with 0.2 m1 5N H2SO4.Additional duplicate mi- the labeled particulate organic matter was resus- crocosms were used to prepare slides for the enumera- pended in the unlabeled dissolved organic matter tion of microorganisms by the acridme-orange direct- collected as 0.45 pm filtrate, and the unlabeled particu- count technique following preservation of the sample late organic matter was resuspended in the labeled, in Lugol's Iodine (Nishino 1986). In addition to follow- 0.45 klm filtered dissolved organic matter. Subsamples ing the label in both the particulate and dissolved of 1 m1 of each were added to 10 m1 unfiltered seawater fractions, changes in particulate organic carbon were taken in acid-cleaned 20 m1 glass scintillation vials measured using a Perkin-Elmer Model 200 carbon, giving parallel sets. Surface seawater was collected hydrogen, nitrogen analyzer, and changes in dissolved from a mid-shelf region off Georgia, USA. The final organic carbon were measured by means of a Oceano- concentration of organic matter was approximately graphy International Model 700 Total Organic Carbon 10 mg I-' (about 6 mg POC I-', with a specific activity analyzer. Microcosms recovered at zero hour consti- of 5000 dpm pgC-'; and about 4 mg DOC 1-l, with a tuted the controls. To estimate bacterial carbon, I specific activity of 5000 dpm ygC-l), which is compar- employed here the bacteria cell to carbon conversion able to that found under natural conditions during factor of 20 fg (bacteria cell)-' (Fuhrman & Azam 1980, phytoplankton blooms (Newell et al. 1981, Fukami et Jacobsen & Azam 1984).I estimated the carbon conver- al. 1985a, b). sion efficiency (C,), which is an expression for the yield The microcosms were then incubated in the dark at of net bacterial carbon produ.ced per unit carbon Biddanda: Phytoplankton-derived detritus. 11. Microbial metabolism 9 1 utilized from the detritus (Linley 1983, Linley & Newel1 28.3 % (average: 30.6 %) for Cylindrotheca fusiforrnis 1984), according to the formula: particulate and dissolved fractions, respectively. The average daily C, for the 16 d duration was 10.6 O/O for Carbon incorporated into bacteria C, = Synechococcus, 15.8 % for Dunaliella, and 19.1 and Carbon utilized from the detritus 21.9 % (average: 20.5 %) for C. fusiformis particulate The advantages of the switching substrate technique and dissolved fractions, respectively. are that it (1) minimizes the rapid initial leaching from fresh detritus, (2) eliminates the artifacts due to the presence of filters along with the substrate in the micro- cosm, (3)is more realistic in having all the components of the natural environment, and (4) allows the inves- tigator to follow the fate of detritus in terms of either particulate or dissolved organic carbon while both frac- tions are simultaneously present, in terms of carbon respired and carbon incorporated into microbial bio- mass. RESULTS With Synechococcus sp. and Dunaliella sp, detritus, there were no significant differences (alpha = 0.0001)in the rate of mineralization

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us