
YouGov / Media Standards Trust Survey Results Sample Size: 2030 GB Adults Fieldwork: 31st January - 1st February 2013 Voting intention 2010 Vote Gender Age Social grade Region Lib Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Con Lab Male Female 18-24 25-39 40-59 60+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 2030 550 663 197 645 512 447 987 1043 246 518 694 572 1157 873 260 660 434 499 177 Unweighted Sample 2030 502 693 155 613 530 456 955 1075 186 515 778 551 1331 699 311 674 401 465 179 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % The Government set up the Leveson Inquiry in 2011, in the wake of the phone hacking scandal, to inquire into the culture, practices and ethics of the press. In 2012 it published its report and recommendations for a new system of press regulation. How closely, if at all, have you personally been following news of the Leveson inquiry and press regulation? Very closely 6 5 7 8 5 7 6 8 3 8 7 5 4 7 4 6 5 4 6 8 Fairly closely 35 36 39 41 36 37 44 42 29 30 29 35 44 37 33 34 33 38 36 36 Not very closely 46 50 44 42 49 46 43 39 53 45 48 48 43 44 48 40 47 47 46 49 Not at all 13 9 10 10 11 11 7 10 15 18 15 13 9 11 15 20 14 11 12 7 1 © 2013 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved yougov.co.uk Fieldwork: 31st January - 1st February 2013 Voting intention 2010 Vote Gender Age Social grade Region Lib Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Con Lab Male Female 18-24 25-39 40-59 60+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 2030 550 663 197 645 512 447 987 1043 246 518 694 572 1157 873 260 660 434 499 177 Unweighted Sample 2030 502 693 155 613 530 456 955 1075 186 515 778 551 1331 699 311 674 401 465 179 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Lord Justice Leveson recommended that the press set up a new self regulatory body governed by an independent board, and underpinned by a new law. He recommended that: Newspapers should be obliged to print corrections and apologies when they get things wrong The new regulator should have the power to investigate serious breaches of standards There should be a relatively fast and free alternative to the courts, for members of the public who feel have been libelled, harassed or had their privacy intruded upon In return, newspapers that agreed to be part of an independent and effective system would be protected from some of the high costs and damages of legal action against them. Generally speaking, do you think the government should or should not implement Lord Justice Leveson's recommendations? Should implement the recommendations 74 76 79 79 73 76 85 74 75 61 73 76 80 78 70 69 75 75 74 81 Should not implement the recommendations 9 13 7 9 11 8 5 12 6 14 9 8 7 9 9 11 7 11 9 9 Don't know 17 11 13 12 15 15 11 15 19 25 18 16 13 14 21 20 18 14 18 10 Thinking about the need to ensure independent and effective regulation of the press, and the need to protect press freedom, which of the following best reflects your view? For press regulation to be effective and 52 52 58 63 49 56 62 54 51 37 50 55 57 54 49 48 53 53 53 52 independent it needs to be backed up by a law Any regulation of the press backed by a law would risk the freedom of the press and political 23 32 18 19 31 18 20 27 19 27 23 22 24 22 24 23 23 24 23 25 interference Neither 8 7 9 7 7 10 6 7 9 10 8 9 7 7 10 8 10 6 7 10 Don't know 16 10 16 11 13 17 12 12 21 27 20 14 12 16 17 21 14 17 18 12 2 © 2013 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved yougov.co.uk Fieldwork: 31st January - 1st February 2013 Voting intention 2010 Vote Gender Age Social grade Region Lib Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Con Lab Male Female 18-24 25-39 40-59 60+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 2030 550 663 197 645 512 447 987 1043 246 518 694 572 1157 873 260 660 434 499 177 Unweighted Sample 2030 502 693 155 613 530 456 955 1075 186 515 778 551 1331 699 311 674 401 465 179 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % An alternative means of trying to ensure that a new system of press self-regulation is independent and effective is to have it monitored by a new body which is set up using a Royal Charter. This would avoid the need for a new law but, on its own, would not achieve all of Leveson’s recommendations. How much confidence would you have in... A press regulator set up by the newspapers, backed by a new law A lot of confidence 6 6 8 6 5 7 6 7 5 7 8 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 7 8 A fair amount of confidence 34 35 32 44 36 34 37 36 32 36 37 31 35 37 30 33 37 34 30 38 TOTAL A LOT/ FAIR AMOUNT OF CONFIDENCE 40 41 40 50 41 41 43 43 37 43 45 36 40 43 35 38 42 39 37 46 Not much confidence 34 37 33 34 36 31 37 34 33 30 30 36 35 33 35 30 31 36 36 37 No confidence at all 12 10 13 9 11 13 12 12 12 7 9 15 13 12 12 13 12 12 12 10 TOTAL NOT MUCH / NO CONFIDENCE 46 47 46 43 47 44 49 46 45 37 39 51 48 45 47 43 43 48 48 47 Don't know 14 11 14 7 12 16 8 10 18 21 16 14 11 12 17 19 14 13 15 8 A press regulator set up voluntarily by the newspapers, without any legal backing A lot of confidence 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 3 1 A fair amount of confidence 11 12 11 15 14 10 11 13 10 17 15 9 8 12 11 11 12 11 12 10 TOTAL A LOT/ FAIR AMOUNT OF CONFIDENCE 12 14 13 15 15 12 12 15 11 19 18 10 9 13 12 13 12 12 15 11 Not much confidence 37 41 37 38 39 37 37 37 37 37 38 35 38 37 36 35 38 38 32 47 No confidence at all 36 36 37 40 35 38 43 38 35 23 29 42 43 37 35 33 36 37 38 34 TOTAL NOT MUCH / NO CONFIDENCE 73 77 74 78 74 75 80 75 72 60 67 77 81 74 71 68 74 75 70 81 Don't know 14 10 13 6 11 14 9 10 18 21 16 13 10 12 16 19 14 13 15 8 A press regulator set up by the newspapers, and backed by a Royal Charter A lot of confidence 5 6 5 4 7 5 5 6 4 3 4 6 6 4 6 4 6 5 5 5 A fair amount of confidence 30 35 29 33 35 27 29 31 29 35 31 28 29 30 30 28 30 30 29 33 TOTAL A LOT/ FAIR AMOUNT OF CONFIDENCE 35 41 34 37 42 32 34 37 33 38 35 34 35 34 36 32 36 35 34 38 Not much confidence 36 36 35 42 35 33 41 37 34 31 35 36 38 38 33 32 36 38 35 38 No confidence at all 12 8 14 12 8 17 13 14 11 7 11 15 14 12 13 15 11 11 13 14 TOTAL NOT MUCH / NO CONFIDENCE 48 44 49 54 43 50 54 51 45 38 46 51 52 50 46 47 47 49 48 52 Don't know 17 14 17 10 15 18 12 12 22 24 20 16 13 16 19 22 18 16 18 9 3 © 2013 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved yougov.co.uk Fieldwork: 31st January - 1st February 2013 Voting intention 2010 Vote Gender Age Social grade Region Lib Lib Rest of Midlands / Total Con Lab Con Lab Male Female 18-24 25-39 40-59 60+ ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Dem Dem South Wales Weighted Sample 2030 550 663 197 645 512 447 987 1043 246 518 694 572 1157 873 260 660 434 499 177 Unweighted Sample 2030 502 693 155 613 530 456 955 1075 186 515 778 551 1331 699 311 674 401 465 179 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % A press regulator set up by the government, backed by a new law A lot of confidence 13 14 15 14 13 13 13 13 12 14 11 13 14 14 11 7 12 14 15 16 A fair amount of confidence 41 46 41 51 41 41 47 43 40 29 42 42 44 43 39 43 41 40 41 44 TOTAL A LOT/ FAIR AMOUNT OF CONFIDENCE 54 60 56 65 54 54 60 56 52 43 53 55 58 57 50 50 53 54 56 60 Not much confidence 22 19 23 22 20 21 23 23 20 29 21 22 18 21 22 20 22 25 19 21 No confidence at all 10 10 7 5 14 9 7 11 9 7 10 9 13 9 11 8 11 9 10 9 TOTAL NOT MUCH / NO CONFIDENCE 32 29 30 27 34 30 30 34 29 36 31 31 31 30 33 28 33 34 29 30 Don't know 15 12 14 8 11 15 10 10 19 21 16 14 11 13 17 22 14 12 15 9 The Leveson Report recommended that senior politicians publish details of all meetings with media owners, newspaper editors or senior executives, and whether they discussed media policy at them.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages8 Page
-
File Size-