Tongue-And-Tonsil-Carcinoma.Pdf

Tongue-And-Tonsil-Carcinoma.Pdf

1843 Tongue and Tonsil Carcinoma Increasing Trends in the U.S. Population Ages 20–44 Years 1,2 Caroline H. Shiboski, D.D.S., M.P.H., Ph.D. BACKGROUND. An increasing incidence of oral carcinoma among young adults has 2,3 Brian L. Schmidt, D.D.S., M.D., Ph.D. been reported in the U.S. and Europe. Although the association between human 1,2,4 Richard C. K. Jordan, D.D.S., Ph.D. papillomavirus infection and tonsillar carcinoma is now well established, to the authors’ knowledge little is known about incidence trends in tonsillar carcinoma 1 Department of Stomatology, Division of Oral Pa- among younger adults. The objective of the current study was to explore the trends thology, Oral Medicine, Oral Radiology, School of in both oral cavity and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in younger U.S. Dentistry, University of California San Francisco, populations, in particular tongue and tonsillar SCC. San Francisco, California. METHODS. Using the 1973–2001 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results 2 Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Cal- (SEER) database, we computed age, race, and site-specific trends of oral and ifornia San Francisco, San Francisco, California. pharyngeal (excluding nasopharynx) carcinoma incidence rates. The percent 3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, change (PC) and annual percent change (APC) were computed to explore trends in School of Dentistry, University of California San incidence rates over time. Francisco, San Francisco, California. RESULTS. There were 2262 SCC of the oral cavity and 1251 SCC of the pharynx 4 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, reported to the SEER program from 1973 to 2001 in adults aged 20–44 years. There University of California San Francisco, San Fran- was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of oral tongue SCC (APC cisco, California. ϭϩ2.1; P Ͻ 0.001), base of tongue SCC (APC ϭϩ1.7; P ϭ 0.04), and palatine tonsil SCC (APC ϭϩ3.9; P Ͻ 0.001) among younger white individuals, whereas the incidence of SCC in all other oral and pharyngeal sites decreased or remained constant. CONCLUSIONS. The increase in tonsil SCC incidence from 1973 to 2001 paralleled the increase in tongue SCC, whereas SCC in all other oral and pharyngeal sites remained constant or decreased. This may suggest similar etiologic factors for SCC affecting the palatine tonsils and tongue in younger populations. Cancer 2005;103: 1843–9. © 2005 American Cancer Society. KEYWORDS: oral carcinoma, pharyngeal carcinoma, tongue carcinoma, tonsil car- cinoma, epidemiology, young adults, trends, relative survival. Supported by Grants K23 DE00443, DE14609, and etween 1992 and 2001, cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx was PO1DE13904 from the National Institutes of Health Bthe 7th most common cancer among men in the U.S., with an (NIH)/National Institute of Dental and Cranio-Facial 1 Research (NIDCR), by Grant CA095231from the incidence rate of 16.7 per 100,000. It was the fourth most common NIH/National Cancer Institute, and by Grants 11RT- cancer and ranked tenth among the most common causes of death 0141 and 12KT-0166 from the Tobacco-Related among African American men. During the last decade, investigators in Disease Research Program. the U.S. and Europe reported increasing incidence rates of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) among young adults Ͻ 45 years of Address for reprints: Caroline H. Shiboski, D.D.S., 2–8 Ph.D., Department of Stomatology, Division of Oral age. A recent analysis was conducted on combined tumor registry 8 Pathology, Oral Medicine, Oral Radiology, Box data from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. Scandinavian 0422, Room S612, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Uni- tumor registries, which are nearly all inclusive with 95% of cancers versity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, diagnosed being reported, provide an opportunity for high-quality, CA 94143-0422; Fax: (415) 476-4204; E-mail: population-based studies of cancer incidence and trends. Among [email protected] 5024 oral tongue SCC reported between 1960 and 1994, 276 (5.5%) Received September 28, 2004; accepted Novem- occurred among young adults (ages 20–39 years). The incidence of ber 30, 2004. oral tongue SCC increased 5-fold among young men (0.06–0.32 per © 2005 American Cancer Society DOI 10.1002/cncr.20998 Published online 16 March 2005 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). 1844 CANCER May 1, 2005 / Volume 103 / Number 9 100,000) and 6-fold among young women (0.03–0.19 cavity sites are grouped as lip, tongue (including base per 100,000) compared with only a 2-fold increase in of tongue), floor of mouth, and “other mouth” (gingi- older age groups. va/palate/buccal mucosa/vestibule) whereas the pha- Even though oral SCC is strongly associated with a ryngeal sites are grouped as tonsil (palatine tonsil), lifetime history of cigarette smoking and alcohol con- oropharynx, hypopharynx, and pharynx not otherwise sumption in older adults (age Ͼ 55 years), to our specified. For the current analysis, we separated oral knowledge little is known about potential risk factors tongue, which we grouped with oral cavity carcino- associated with this disease in younger patients. Con- mas, from base of tongue, which we grouped with versely, the association between human papillomavi- pharyngeal carcinomas. Young adults were defined as rus (HPV) infection and the occurrence of tonsil SCC is persons ages 20–44 years of age. now well established among adult patients,9–14 but to our knowledge little is known about trends in inci- Statistical Analysis dence rates of tonsil SCC in younger adults. An anal- We used the SEER*Stat version 5.3.1 software16 and ysis of Swedish cancer registry data (1958–1996) Stata version 8.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, showed that husbands of women with cervical carci- TX) for the analyses presented in the current study. noma had a significantly increased risk of developing Counts and proportions of carcinomas of the oral either tongue or tonsil carcinoma.15 Therefore, be- cavity and pharynx were summarized by age group cause age-specific tongue and tonsil SCC may share and specific site, and in the younger age group by race. certain etiologic factors, we sought to explore national We computed incidence rates of SCC of both the oral cancer registry data over the past three decades to cavity and pharynx, defined as the number of new determine whether the trend in tonsil SCC rates mir- cases per 100,000 persons, and age adjusted to the U.S. rors the increasing trend of tongue SCC in younger standard million population of 2000. We first explored populations in the U.S., and whether these trends the trend of these incidence rates by gender over the differ from trends of SCC in other oral cavity and 1973–2001 time period in the entire adult population pharyngeal sites. (age Ն 20 years). We then examined the trend in oral tongue SCC compared with other oral cavity sites, and MATERIALS AND METHODS the trend in tonsil SCC incidence compared with base Data Source and Variables of tongue and other pharyngeal sites over the 1973– We obtained 1973–2001 oral and pharyngeal cancer 2001 time period in the younger age group (ages incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology 20–44 years) by race. We computed the percent and End Results (SEER) program.16 The SEER program change (PC) and the annual percent change (APC) was established by the National Cancer Institute in from 1973 to 2001. The APC is computed by fitting a 1973, in response to the 1971 National Cancer Act.17 It least-squares regression line to the natural logarithm currently collects data from population-based cancer of the rates, using calendar year as a regressor vari- registries in 11 geographic areas that together repre- able.17 Testing the hypothesis that the APC is equal to sent an estimated 14% of the U.S. population: 5 states zero is equivalent to testing the hypothesis that the (Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, and Utah) regression slope parameter is equal to zero. The hy- and 6 standard metropolitan statistical areas (Atlanta, pothesis is rejected at the 0.05 significance level. The Detroit, San Francisco–Oakland, Seattle–Puget Sound, computation of the APC, and the testing of the hy- San Jose–Monterey, and Los Angeles County). The pothesis that the APC is equal to zero, relies on the completeness of reporting of cancer cases to the SEER assumption of a linear change of the trends in log rates program was estimated to be 97% for 6 of the geo- over time. To assess whether this assumption was graphic areas for the year 1987.18 The SEER registry reasonable, we fitted a Poisson regression model in includes data on patient demographics, primary tu- which year of diagnosis was included as a continuous mor site, morphology/histology, stage at diagnosis, variable, and other Poisson regression models using a and first course of treatment. Information on vital spline function with various numbers of breakpoints status is actively followed. For the current analysis, we or knots to allow the categorization of time after dif- extracted the following cases from the 1973–2001 da- ferent distributions. We then compared the log-likeli- tabase: adults Ն 20 years with invasive SCC (no in situ hood of these various models against the log-likeli- cases) affecting the oral cavity (salivary glands ex- hood of the strictly linear model, and found no cluded) and the pharynx (nasopharynx excluded). statistically significant difference between the models Both salivary gland and nasopharynx cancers were using the likelihood ratio test. excluded because the majority of cancers affecting We used a life table method to compute survival these sites are not SCC.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us