Preservation of Man ” 1851 • Philosopher • Emerson Transcendentalism

Preservation of Man ” 1851 • Philosopher • Emerson Transcendentalism

What are NR’s? • Tangible substance • Function or use What is an environment? • A collection of NR’s in a defined area What is a Ecosystem • All of the ecological processes in a n environment What is wilderness? • Theoretically an undisturbed environment • Big “W” • Little “w” U. S. History and the Environment • Growth of the U.S. • Traditional view of NRs • 1890 closing of the frontier • CidliConservation and population Modern View of the Environment • Technology • Wilderness • Product of civilization • 3rd world European View of Wilderness • European landscape of the 1600s • Perception of wilderness • Basis of bias - RliiReligion - Superstition and folklore Settlers View of the NA Wilderness • Paradise Myth • Reality • Not prepared to live “with” the env. Settlers’ Bias on the Frontier • Safety • Effect of wilderness • Doing God’s work – Manifest Destiny • Wilderness = waste Romanticism • Late 1700s – mid 1800s • Urban, educated , wealthy • Writers and artists • CiCoincid es wi ihhth the growth of sci ences • Enthusiasm for wild places Romanticism • Sublimity • Awe •Deism • GhkhGreat watchmaker theory • Primitivism • The noble savage Start of the American Environmental Movement • Europe = history, cities, culture • USU.S. = Wilderness, NRs • American wilderness = American character • MifDManifest Dest iny Hudson River School • American wild landscape as inspiration • Thomas Cole • First American art form • View o f Amer ican art ist, wri ter, etc Henry David Thoreau • 1817 – 1862 •“In wilderness is the preservation of man ” 1851 • Philosopher • Emerson Transcendentalism • 2 levels of reality • Lower material object world • Higher spiritual truth world • NlbjfldiilhifNatural objects reflected spiritual truth if seen correctly • Must use imagination and intuition as opposed to rational understanding Thoreau’s Life • Early wilderness is best • Walden Pond • Trip to Maine • Later life phil osophy h – 1f1 foot in 1 1f foot out • Value of civilization • Value of wilderness for people - anthropocentric Call for Preservation • By mid 1800s regret loss of wilderness • References to environmental destruction • Harmonic theory • TdfhTragedy of the commons • Changes in ownership and control of NRs • Hot Springs AR, Niagara Falls -Economic value – not environmental values Yellowstone • First reports of the region • 1870 expedition • 1871 expedition • NhNorthern PifiRildPacific Railroad • 1872 Yellowstone Park Act • 1886 railroad debate Adirondack Park • Location/topography/climate/exploration • Impact of timbering • Commerce • WlhWealthy sportsmen Adirondack Park • 1885 Forest Preserve • 1892 Adirondack Park • 1894 Forever Wild clause • TdToday The Conservation Movement 1890 -1970 • Closing of the frontier 1890 • Extend use of the remaining NRs • > population, urbanization, industrialization • AiClAmerican Culture and didi identity • Progressive movement The Progressive Movement 1900 - 1920 • Governments responsibility • Justice and order • Counter monopolies John Muir 1838 - 1914 • Wilderness protection and “preservation” • Value of nature for nature • Popular writer and speaker John Muir • His life • His philosophy – Preservation • Comparison to Thoreau • His impact Gifford Pinchot 1865 - 1946 • His life • His philosophy – conservation • His impact Theodore Roosevelt 1858 - 1919 • His life • His philosophy – Nationalism • His impact Conservation versus Preservation • Muir & Pinchot • Influence on Roosevelt • Forest Reserve Act of 1891 • Forest Management Act o f 1897 • The future Changing View of Nature • Joe Knowles story • Why the change – No longer a need to “battle” nature – Visit nature for leisure – City view of pioneer qualities – DliiDeclining st ttfitate of city envi ronment Changing Perception of American Culture • Impact of immigration • Business values and city life • Growth of government and industry versus the individual Response to Changing Perception • Fredrick Jackson Turner 1896 • Robert Baden Powell 1907 • Theodore Roosevelt 1893, 1903 • William K ent @1908 •Result Hetch Hetchy • 1882 – 1913 • The issue • Pinchot, Muir, Roosevelt • PbliPublic opi iinion • 1909 vote Hetch Hetchy • Conservationist view of recreation • Preservationist response • Progressive view • William K ent • 1913 vote •Result Conservation to Environmentalism • 1921 – 1970 • Focus on management of NR interrelationships and processes • Federal government leadership • $ and planning • Large regional projects ex. TVA, CCC, AT Conservation to Environmentalism • Goals (by end of 1960s) - protect environmental quality - maintain physical base of all life - manage for non-materilial val ues * recreation * scenery * solitude Aldo Leopold 1886 - 1948 • Early life • Forest Service years • Gila NF 1924 • L-20 regu lat ions 1929 Leopold’s Benefits of Wilderness • Cultural heritage • The remnant • Primitive forms of recreation • Large wildlif e h abi tat • For science Leopold’s Land Ethic • A Sand County Almanac 1949 • Enlarges the boundary • Changes the role • VlValue > t han econom ic se lfilf interest • Ethical behavior Bob Marshall 1901 - 1939 • His life • Ideas – action • Forest Service • UliU regulations • Wilderness Society 1935 Marshall’s Benefits of Wilderness • Health • Self sufficiency • Esthetic • MlMental Echo Park Dam • 1940s - 1955 • Colorado River Storage project plan • Dinosaur National Monument • HhHhHetch Hetchy • David Brower • Howard Zahniser • Outcome Wilderness Act of 1964 • Role of Zahniser • Zahniser’s reasons for protection 1. Take the offensive 2. EblihEstablish a nati onal system 3. Move to legislative protection • Outcome Grand Canyon Dams • Colorado River Storage project 1956 • Glen Canyon Dam 1963 – Lake Powell • Impact on the environmental movement Grand Canyon Dams cont. • Lower Colorado River – 2 dams 1963 • Result = flood 40 mi . GCNM , 13 mi . GCNP • GCNP act 1919 Grand Canyon Dams cont. • David Brower • IRS controversy • No Hetch Hetchy mistakes • NiNo compromise • H. Zahniser on progress Grand Canyon Dams Results • 1968 congress abandons project • Political support vs . public opinion • Illustrates the change from CM to EM • Sierra c lub memb ers hip • Wild and Scenic River act 1968 • Change from Hetch Hetchy New Environmentalism 1970 - Present • Wilderness being loved to death • Reasons for this trend - Technology change - TihTransportation change - Information growth - Intellectual revolution New Environmentalism cont. • 1970 Earth Day • Growth in Environmental laws - NEPA 1970 • Mo dern v iew o f w ilderness - Sigurd Olson - John Milton Changing Environmental Perception • Howard Zahniser • Spaceship earth • Counter culture break from the mainstream • GSdGary Snyder • Eddy Abbey Anthropcentrism • Mainstream or modern environmentalism • Shallow ecology • Traditional type support groups - Sierra Cl ub 1892 – 600, 000 mem bers (passive) 2000 - Audubon Society 1905 - Wilderness Society 1936 Biocentricism • New or ecocentric environmentalism •Deeppgy ecology • Direct Action support groups - Friends of Earth 1969 - Green Peace 1969 - Earth First! 1981 – 12, 000 members (active) 1988 - Earth Liberation Front (()ELF) ? Deep vs Shallow Ecology Shallow Ecology - Dominance over nature - Env. = resources for humans -Ample NRs reserves - Material, economic, consumer growth - Solutions to env. Problems in science and technology - National centralized focus Deep vs Shallow Ecology Deep Ecology -Harmony with nature - All nature has intrinsic equal worth -Simpp()le material need (self realization) - NRs are limited - Suspicion of science and technology - Focus on traditional culture and bioregionalism Reasons for the the split of ME & NE • MEs are reformist working within the system • MEs are anthropocentric • MEs are alienated from grass root idealism • MEs are more interested in compromise thihhan in change Alaska • Environment • Technology • Native people - ANCSA 1971 • Wilderness Rampart Dam -1959 • Corp of Engineers – Yukon River • 1 billion $ • World largest human created lake • WldWould not aff ect a NP • Alaska env. View vs U.S. env. View • Dam project stopped in 1967 ANILCA 1980 • 99% of AK public (federal) land • ANCSA deadline 12/18 1978 • Carter 12/1/78 – Antiquities Act – 110 mil. Acres • Carter/Reagan debate • Congress/Carter pass/sign act 12/80 •Reagon takes office 1/81 ANILCA 1980 cont. • Results - Revoked 1978 executive order - 105 mil. Acres to state of AK - 44 m il. A cres to nati ve peopl e - 104 mil. Acres federal land (28% of AK = CA) ANILCA 1980 cont. • Federal allocation - 56.7 mil. Acres – NWPS - 26 additions to the NWSRS - Doubled the size of NPS lands - Doubled the size of USFWS wildlife refuges lands • Most expansive action on behalf of wild by any president Alaska in Perspective • 1/3 AK “Big W” • Less restrictive view of wild • A permanent frontier: Nash, Leopold, Marshall, Turner • A legacy of wild for future generations: Thoreau, Mu ir, Olmstead Alaska in Perspective cont. • Protect wild and native culture: Catlin • Protect entire ecosystems: Marsh , Leopold • AK represents a change in American perspective towards wilderness Environmental Movement since 1980 • > Concern for global env. • > Growth in deep ecology • >Growth in conservative backlash Reagan/Bush sr. 1980-92 • Reaganomics - LWCF • James Watt • Sage brus h re be llion 1980 s • Wise Use movement 1990s Sagebrush/Wise Use Movements • < env. rules and regs. • < fed. land holding • < env. quality in business and private property decisions • > personal rights over env. Rights Sagebrush/Wise Use Movements • Supported by timber, mining, energy,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    81 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us