Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 03:30:34PM Via Free Access

Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 03:30:34PM Via Free Access

JOBNAME: Richardson PAGE: 1 SESS: 2 OUTPUT: Fri Dec 9 15:42:55 2016 Table of cases Australia AGL Sydney Ltd v Shortland County Council (1989) IPR 99 ............................. 390 Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Claim Group v Commonwealth of Australia (2013) 250 CLR 209 ................................................................... 212 AMS vAIF (1999) 199 CLR 160 ........................................................................ 199 Australian Performing RightsAssociation Ltd v Canterbury Bankstown Leagues Club Ltd [1964–65] NSWR 138 ................................................................. 210 Australian Performing RightsAssociation Ltd v Jain (1990) 96ALR 619. ......... 210 Australian Performing RightsAssociation Ltd v Miles [1962] NSWR 405 ........ 210 Banjima People v State of WesternAustralia (2015) 322ALR 199 ..................... 211 Bryl v Nowra [1999] HREOCA 11 (21 June 1999) (Miss Bosnia case) .............. 201 Bulun Bulun v R & T Textiles Pty Ltd (1998) 86 FCR 244 .................................. 212 Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd (2015) 328ALR 458 ................... 5 eBay InternationalAG v Creative Festival Entertainment Pty Ltd (2006) 170 FCR 450 ............................................................................................................. 218 Enzed Holdings Ltd v Wynthea Pty Ltd (1984) 4 FCR 450 ................................. 262 Flags 2000 v Smith (2003) 59 IPR 191 ............................................................... 212 Galaxy Electronics Pty Ltd v Sega Enterprises Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 8 .................. 347 Henderson v Radio Corporation Pty Ltd (1960) 1A IPR 620 ................... 432–3, 435 Hogan v Pacific Dunlop Ltd (1988) 83ALR 403 ............................................ 433–4 IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine NetworkAustralia Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 458 ...... 372, 381, 383 InterlegoAG vAlex Folley (Vic) Pty Ltd [1987] FSR 283 (Ch) .......................... 325 InterlegoAG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 111ALR 577 .............................. 324 Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment v Stevens (2003) 200ALR 96 ............................................................................................................... 366 Melbourne Corporation v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174 .......................................... 199 Meskenas vACP Publishing Pty Ltd (2006) 70 IPR 172 ..................................... 234 Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd (1994) FCR 240 ................................................ 212 Moorgate Tobacco Co Ltd v Philip Morris Ltd (No 2) (1984) 156 CLR 414 ....... 315 Nine Films and Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd (2005) 2005] FCA 1404, 67 IPR 46 .................................................................................... 286, 388, 391 Nine Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2002] 118 FCR 417 .................. 255 Pacific Dunlop v Hogan (1989) 87ALR 14 ................................................. 434, 436 Pell v The Council of the Trustees of the National Gallery ofVictoria [1998] 2VR 391 ..................................................................................................... 197, 201 Perez v Fernandez [2012] FMCA 2 (10 February 2012) ..................................... 228 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v EndemolAustralia Pty Ltd (2015) 114 IPR 287 .......................................................................... 372, 387, 388, 390, 391–2 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2007] FCA 1062 (27 July 2007) ....... 156, 392 Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment (2005) 224 CLR 193 ............................................................................................................. 347 ix Megan Richardson and Sam Ricketson - 9781784710798 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 03:30:34PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Richardson-Research_handbook_on_IP_in_media_and_entertainment / Division: ToC /Pg. Position: 1 / Date: 8/12 JOBNAME: Richardson PAGE: 2 SESS: 2 OUTPUT: Fri Dec 9 15:42:55 2016 x Research handbook on intellectual property in media and entertainment Telstra Corporation Ltd v Royal & SunAlliance InsuranceAustralia Ltd (2003) 57 IPR 453 ................................................................................. 380, 389–90, 398 Thomas v Brown (1997) 37 IPR 207 ................................................................... 212 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v SouthAustralian Brewing Co Ltd (1996) 66 FCR 451 ..................................................................................................... 441 Universal MusicAustralia Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd (2005) 222 FCR 465 ............................................................................................................. 150 Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479 ......................................................................... 48, 49, 50, 53, 54, 204, 384 WesternAustralia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1 ...................................................... 211 Wilson v Luke (1875) 1VLR (E) 127 ................................................................... 13 Wilson v Rowcroft (1873) 4ALR 57 .................................................................... 13 Yanner v Eaton (No 1) (1999) 201 CLR 351 ....................................................... 199 Yumbulul v Reserve Bank ofAustralia (1991) 21 IPR 481 ................................. 212 Belgium Google Inc v Copiepresse, Cour d’appel Bruxelles [Court ofAppeal Brussels], neuvième chambre [9th chamber], 2007/AR/1730, 5 May 2011 ... 33, 34, 38–9 NV Code v BV Mercis/Dick Bruna, Hof van beroepAntwerpen [Court ofAppeal of Antwerp], 2 May 2006 ................................................................................. 82 Van Giel v Tuymans, Rechtbank van de eerste aanlegAntwerp [Court of First Instance ofAntwerp], Judgment of the President, Docket no 14/4305/A, 15 January 2015 ................................................................................................ 80 Canada CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339 ............................................................................................................. 183 Cie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v CAW Canada (1996) 71 CPR (3d) 348 (FC) ............................................................................................................. 66 KirkbiAG v Ritvik Holdings Inc [2005] 3 SCR 302, [2005] SCC 65 .................. 325 ProductionsAvanti-Ciné-Vidéo Inc v Favreau (1999) 1 CPR (4th) 129 (CA) ....... 66 Society of Composers,Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v Bell Canada, 2012 SCC 36, [2012] 2 SCR 326 [25] ......................................................... 254 Twentieth Century Fox Film Co v iCraveTV,53 USPO 2d (BNA) 1831 (WD Pa 2000) ............................................................................................................ 55 France Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], chambre civile 1 [First Civil Chamber], RTD Com 1988, 12 January 1988 ................................................................ 79 Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], chambre civile 1 [First Civil Chamber], 08-11.112, 24 September 2009 .................................................................. 232 Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], chambre civile 1 [First Civil Chamber], 10-27043, 3 July 2013 ................................................................................ 233 Cour de cassation [Court of Cassation], chambre civile 1 [First Civil Chamber], 11-12.508, 10April 2013 ........................................................................... 262 Megan Richardson and Sam Ricketson - 9781784710798 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 03:30:34PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Richardson-Research_handbook_on_IP_in_media_and_entertainment / Division: ToC /Pg. Position: 2 / Date: 8/12 JOBNAME: Richardson PAGE: 3 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Fri Dec 9 15:42:55 2016 Table of cases xi Germany Bild Kunst v Focus [2005] ECDR 6 (BGH) .................................................... 65, 83 Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Court of Justice], 9 November 2011 (I ZR 216/10), reported in GRUR 2012 ...................................................................... 172, 236 Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Court of Justice], 16 May 2013 (I ZR 28/12), reported in GRUR 2014 ............................................................................................ 242 LG Berlin [Berlin Regional Court], 4 November 2014 (15 O 153/14), reported in ZUM 2015 ................................................................................................. 239 LG Hamburg [Hamburg Regional Court] (308 O 23/13) ..................................... 230 LG Köln [Cologne Regional Court], 30 January 2014 (14 O 427/13), reported in BeckRS 2014, 03266 ................................................................................. 233 OLG München [Munich Regional Court ofAppeals] (29 U 5864/95) ................. 235 OLG München [Munich Regional Court ofAppeals], 8 February 1996 (29 U 5864/95), reported in NJW 1996 ...................................................... 227 Italy Mega Blocks Inc v Lego SystemA/S [2008] ETMR 73, Supreme Court (First Civil Section) ...................................................................................................... 325 The Netherlands The Blue Band/Blue Band [1981] BIE 266,Arrondissementsrechtbank teArnhem [District Court ofArnhem],

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us