Haloglomus Irregulare Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Marine Saltern

Haloglomus Irregulare Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a New Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Marine Saltern

microorganisms Article Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov., a New Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Marine Saltern Ana Durán-Viseras , Cristina Sánchez-Porro and Antonio Ventosa * Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] (A.D.-V.); [email protected] (C.S.-P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-954556765 Received: 9 December 2019; Accepted: 30 January 2020; Published: 2 February 2020 Abstract: A halophilic archaeal strain, designated F16-60T, was isolated from Isla Cristina marine saltern in Huelva, Spain. Cells were pleomorphic, irregular, non-motile, and Gram-stain-negative. It produced red-pigmented colonies on agar plates. Strain F16-60T was extremely halophilic (optimum at 30% (w/v) NaCl) and neutrophilic (optimum pH 7.5). Phylogenetic tree reconstructions based on 16S rRNA and rpoB´ gene sequences revealed that strain F16-60T was distinct from species of the related genera Natronomonas, Halomarina, and Halomicrobium, of the order Halobacteriales. The polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester (PGP-Me), phosphatidylglycerol sulfate (PGS), and one glycolipid chromatographically identical to sulfated mannosyl glucosyl diether (S-DGD-1). The DNA G+C content is 68.0 mol%. The taxonomic study, based on a combination of phylogenetic, genomic, chemotaxonomic, and phenotypic analyses, suggest that strain F16-60T (= CECT 9635T = JCM 33318T), represents a novel species of a new genus within the family Haloarculaceae and the order Halobacteriales, for which the name Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. Metagenomic fragment recruitment analysis revealed the worldwide distribution of members of this genus and suggested the existence of other closely related species to be isolated. Keywords: haloarchaea; hypersaline habitats; salterns; taxonomy; ecology; Haloglomus 1. Introduction The class Halobacteria is a major group within the domain Archaea, and comprises halophilic archaea (also called haloarchaea) which are typically found in hypersaline environments, such as salt lakes, soda lakes, or salterns [1]. The class Halobacteria includes three orders, Haloferacales, Halobacteriales, and Natrialbales, which consist of several different families [2–4]. Haloarchaea exhibit enormous diversity in terms of their morphology or physiology. They can be coccoid, rod-shaped, pleomorphic, or even square, motile, or non-motile cells. In addition to their extreme NaCl requirements, they may grow at neutral or alkaline conditions, and thus they may be haloalkaliphiles [1,4,5]. Marine salterns are thalassohaline environments, which constitute excellent models for ecological studies based on their structure of a series of ponds with different salinities, and thus, have been long-term targets for the study of halophilic microbial diversity [6]. One of these salterns is located in Isla Cristina, Southwest coast of Spain (37◦ 120 N 7◦ 190 O). Metagenomic studies carried out in an intermediate salinity pond (21% salts) of this saltern showed the predominance of members of the phylum Euryarchaeota, followed by the phylum Bacteroidetes, being the genera Halorubrum, Psychroflexus, and Natronomonas the most abundant groups. Moreover this analysis also brought to light that a large number of haloarchaeal members have not been isolated until date [7,8]. On the other hand, several culture-dependent studies performed in these salterns have permitted the isolation and characterization of new groups of halophilic bacteria, such as members of the genera Spiribacter [9,10], Microorganisms 2020, 8, 206; doi:10.3390/microorganisms8020206 www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Microorganisms 2020, 8, 206 2 of 15 Idiomarina [11], Marinobacter [12], or Salinivibrio [13], as well as of the archaeal genera Halonotius [14,15] and Halorientalis [16]. In 2016, as part of a new study of the halophilic archaeal diversity of Isla Cristina marine saltern, we isolated a halophilic archaeal strain, designated F16-60T, closely related to members of the order Halobacteriales. In the present study, we describe the properties of strain F16-60T on the basis of recommended standard taxonomic methods, as well as on recent genomic approaches, following the respective minimal standards [17,18]. Our data suggest that strain F16-60T is not related to any previous haloarchaeal taxa and thus, we propose it as a new genus and species, Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov. In addition, we determined that this new haloarchaeon is widely distributed in different hypersaline habitats. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Isolation of Haloarchaeal Strain During the course of studies on Isla Cristina saltern, Southwest coast of Spain (37◦ 12’ 30”–7◦ 19’ 41”) in June 2016, a halophilic archaeal strain, designated F16-60T, was isolated from saline water of a pond of the saltern. At the time of sampling, the salinity of the pond was 32% (w/v) total salts and the pH was 7.5. Samples were transported to the laboratory in a short time and plated under sterile T conditions. Plates were incubated at 37 ◦C for up to three months. Strain F16-60 was isolated in pure culture after successive cultivations, using a medium prepared by filtering the saline water from the pond, with no other nutrients added, and with 2% (w/v) purified agar (Oxoid) as solidifying agent. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.5 with 1 M KOH. Strain F16-60T was routinely grown in the modified DBCM2 medium (CECT medium no. 263) and incubated aerobically at 37 ◦C, using a rotary shaker for growth in liquid medium. The composition of the modified DBCM2 medium is: sodium pyruvate 0.011 g, glucose 0.00025 g, peptone (Difco) 0.00125 g, yeast extract (Difco) 0.00125 g, distilled water 16.67 ml, and 83.33 ml of a stock of seawater SW30 solution, which contained (g/L): NaCl: 195; MgCl2.6H2O: 32.5; MgSO4.7H2O: 50.8; CaCl2: 0.83; KCl: 5.0; NaHCO3: 0.17; NaBr: 0.58. Purified agar 2% (w/v) (Oxoid) was added when necessary. For long time preservation, cultures were maintained at 80 C in a liquid medium containing 40% (v/v) glycerol. Halophilic archaeal type − ◦ strains Natronomonas pharaonis CECT 4578T and Natronomonas moolapensis CECT 7526T, obtained from culture collections, were also used in this study as reference strains. 2.2. DNA Extraction, Purification, and Sequencing DNA extraction for determining the 16S rRNA gene sequence, rpoB´ gene sequence and genome sequence analysis, was obtained using the Marmur method [19]. The quantification of the extracted DNA was determined by spectrophotometry (DeNovix DS-11 FX, DeNovix Technologies, Wilmington, DA, USA) and fluorometry (Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer, Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA quality was checked by (1%) agarose gel electrophoresis. The 16S rRNA gene and the rpoB´ gene were amplified by PCR [20] using the universal primers for archaea ArchF and ArchR [21,22] and the primers designed by Fullmer et al. [23], respectively. Sequencing of PCR products were carried out by StabVida (Oeiras, Portugal) using the Sanger method. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA and rpoB´ gene sequences of strain F16-60T are MH424600 and MK182272, respectively. The genome of strain F16-60T was sequenced using the lllumina Hiseq 4000 platform (StabVida, Oeiras, Portugal). 2.3. Genome Assembly and Annotation The de novo assembly of the reads was performed using Spades 3.9.1 [24]. The quality of final contigs was assessed by the bioinformatics tool CheckM v1.0.5 [25] and Quast v2.3 [26]. The genome sequence was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [27]. The genome of strain F16-60T was deposited in GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ under the accession number QMDX00000000. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 206 3 of 15 2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses The identification of phylogenetic neighbours and calculation of the pairwaise 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of strain F16-60T was carried out by using the EzBioCloud server [28] and GenBank. The 16S rRNA and the rpoB´ gene sequences used for phylogenetic comparisons were obtained from GenBank. To delineate the phylogenetic position, gene sequences alignments were performed using ChromasPro (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Tewantin, Australia) software version 1.5. Bootstrap consensus trees were inferred from 1000 replicates [29] using the neighbour-joining [30], maximum-parsimony [31], and maximum-likelihood [32] algorithms integrated in the ARB software package [33] for the 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic analysis and with MEGA 6.0 software [34] for the rpoB´ gene analysis. Evolutionary distances were calculated according to the algorithms of the Jukes–Cantor model [35]. To calculate phylogenomic relations between strain F16-60T and phylogenetic neighbours, a core-genome tree was constructed. Available genomic sequences of the closely related taxa were also obtained from GenBank. All predicted protein-coding genes annotated from each available genome were compared using the all-versus-all BLAST search [36]. MUSCLE [37] was used for the alignment of core orthologous genes. MEGA 6.0 software [34] was used for the phylogenomic tree reconstruction, by the neighbour-joining method with Jukes–Cantor correction [35]. The number of common genes shared between strain F16-60T and phylogenetic neighbours were represented by a Venn Diagram, which was constructed using the online software InteractiVenn [38]. 2.5. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI), Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI), and Digital DNA–DNA Hybridization (DDH) To confirm the status as a new taxon of the isolated strain, Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI), Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI), and in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) were performed. To calculate ANI, the OAT software v0.93.1 was used [39], while for the estimation of AAI we used the tool AAI calculator [40]. The in silico DDH percentages were calculated by the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) [41] website, using formula 2 [42]. 2.6. Chemotaxonomic Analysis To complete the chemotaxonomic characterization, strain F16-60T was grown in a modified DBCM2 liquid medium and incubated for three weeks to obtain cell biomass.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us