Species Delineation in the Tree Pathogen Genus Celoporthe (Cryphonectriaceae) in Southern Africa

Species Delineation in the Tree Pathogen Genus Celoporthe (Cryphonectriaceae) in Southern Africa

Mycologia, 105(2), 2013, pp. 297–311. DOI: 10.3852/12-206 # 2013 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Species delineation in the tree pathogen genus Celoporthe (Cryphonectriaceae) in southern Africa Marcele Vermeulen INTRODUCTION Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute The genus Celoporthe (Cryphonectriaceae) was first (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, described in 2006 and currently includes five species. Hatfield, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa These are Celoporthe dispersa Nakab., Gryzenh., Jol. Roux & M.J. Wingf. from South Africa and Zambia Marieka Gryzenhout (Nakabonge et al. 2006a, Vermeulen et al. 2011), C. Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9301, South Africa eucalypti S.F. Chen, Gryzenh., M.J. Wingf. & X.D. Zhou, C. guangdongensis S.F. Chen, Gryzenh., M.J. Michael J. Wingfield Wingf. & X.D. Zhou and C. syzygii S.F. Chen, Jolanda Roux1 Gryzenh., M.J. Wingf. & X.D. Zhou from China Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, DST/ (Chen et al. 2011) and C. indonesiensis S.F. Chen, NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology Gryzenh., M.J. Wingf. & X.D. Zhou from Indonesia (CTHB), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag (Chen et al. 2011). Celoporthe species are known only X20, Hatfiel, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa from hosts in the Myrtales (Nakabonge et al. 2006a, Chen et al. 2011, Vermeulen et al. 2011). The type species, C. dispersa, is known only from South Africa Abstract: The genus Celoporthe was first described and Zambia where it occurs on native Heteropyxis when C. dispersa was discovered in South Africa canescens Oliv. (Heteropyxidaceae, Myrtales), Syzy- associated with dieback and cankers on trees in the gium cordatum Oliv., S. guineense (CD.) and S. legatti Myrtales. Four additional species were recently Burtt Davy & Greenway (Myrtaceae, Myrtales) and described from Eucalyptus and Syzygium cumini in non-native Tibouchina granulosa Cogn.:Britton China as well as S. aromaticum and Eucalyptus in (Melastomataceae, Mytales) (Nakabonge et al. Indonesia. Inoculation trials have shown that all 2006a, Vermeulen et al. 2011). Celoporthe indonesien- Celoporthe species, including those that have not been sis infects S. aromaticum (L.) Merr & Perry in found on Eucalyptus species in nature, are pathogenic Indonesia (Myburg et al. 2003, Chen et al. 2011), to Eucalyptus and they are thus potentially threaten- while the Chinese species C. eucalypti and C. ing to commercial Eucalyptus forestry. New isolates, guangdongensis were collected from non-native Euca- morphologically similar to Celoporthe,havebeen lyptus species and C. syzygii is known from non-native collected from S. legatti in South Africa and S. S. cumini (L.) Skeels (Chen et al. 2011). guineense in Zambia. Multigene phylogenetic analyses Celoporthe dispersa is associated with cankers and based on DNA sequences of the ITS region, TEF1a branch dieback on S. cordatum and T. granulosa gene and two areas of the b-tubulin gene revealed (Nakabonge et al. 2006a). Cankers on Het. canescens, additional cryptic species in Celoporthe. Phylogenetic from which C. dispersa was first collected, were severe data were supported by morphological differences. with some trees dying. It was not shown however that C. dispersa was responsible for the death of these trees These resulted in the description of two previously because pathogenicity tests could not be performed unknown species of Celoporthe, namely C. fontana and on Het. canescens. Celoporthe dispersa also poses a C. woodiana, for two of these cryptic groups, while the potential threat to Eucalyptus forestry in that inocu- third group represented C. dispersa. These species all lation trails have shown that the fungus is pathogenic can readily infect Eucalyptus as well as several species to Eucalyptus species, although it has not been seen to of Syzygium, the latter of which are native to Africa. infect these trees in nature (Nakabonge et al. 2006a). Key words: canker pathogens, Heteropyxis ca- Infections of Eucalyptus and Syzygium trees with C. nescens,Myrtales,Syzygium species, Tibouchina granulosa eucalypti, C. guangdongensis and C. syzygii are associated with cracked bark and girdling stem cankers. It is not clear however whether these symptoms are associated with Celoporthe species only or whether symptoms are caused by Chrysoporthe Submitted 5 Jun 2012; accepted for publication 24 Sep 2012. deuterocubensis Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf., a well known 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Eucalyptus pathogen (van der Merwe et al. 2010) 297 298 MYCOLOGIA known to occur in China (Chen et al. 2010). These hand lens. Where present, pieces of bark bearing the fungal fungi co-occur on Syzygium and Eucalyptus in China fruiting bodies resembling the Cryphonectriaceae were (Chen et al. 2011), and it is possible that they removed and placed in separate brown paper bags for combine to produce the symptoms observed in the transport to the laboratory. Isolations were made from field. Pathogenicity tests (Chen et al. 2011) have pieces of bark bearing fruiting structures resembling those of Celoporthe species with techniques described by Gryzen- shown that Chinese Celoporthe species from Syzygium hout et al. (2009). The cultures obtained were deposited in and Eucalyptus are as pathogenic to various Eucalyp- the CMW culture collection (TABLE I), and duplicates of tus genotypes and S. cumini trees as Chr. deuterocu- selected isolates were deposited in the collection of the bensis (Chen et al. 2010). Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS), Utrecht, the Nakabonge et al. (2006a) observed three distinct Netherlands. Herbarium specimens of fruiting structures phylogenetic subclades (1–3) for C. dispersa isolates on bark of selected fungi were also deposited in the from South Africa (FIG. 1). These represented isolates National Collection of Fungi (PREM), Pretoria, South from three different hosts and locations, namely Het. Africa. canescens (Lydenburg, Mpumalanga Province), S. DNA sequence comparisons.—DNA was extracted from cordatum (Tzaneen, Limpopo Province) and T. myceliumgrownon2% malt extract agar (MEA). granulosa (Durban, KwaZulu-Natal Province). Isolates Mycelium was scraped from the surfaces of the MEA residing in these subclades were not described as plates and freeze dried. Freeze-dried mycelium was ground distinct species because there were no obvious to a fine powder with 2 mm diam metal beads in a Retsch morphological differences observed between struc- cell disrupter (Retsch Gmbh, Germany) after which the tures on the limited herbarium material available and protocol described by Mo¨ller et al. (1992) was followed for no teleomorph structures were available for isolates DNA extraction. DNA concentrations were determined from Het. canescens and T. granulosa. Vermeulen et al. with a NanoDrop 3.1.0 ND-1000 uv/Vis spectrophotome- (2011) observed two additional subclades, represent- ter (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware). ing isolates from S. cordatum and S. legatti in South Four gene regions were amplified with the polymerase b b Africa (Soutpansberg, Limpopo Province) and from chain reaction (PCR). The -tubulin 1 and -tubulin 2 regions of the b-tubulin gene (BT) were amplified with S. guineense in Zambia (Ikelenge, North Western primer pairs BT1a, BT1b and BT2a, BT2b respectively Province) (FIG. 1). Due to the limited availability of (Glass and Donaldson 1995). The internal transcribed specimens for the five subclades (1, 2) from Africa, spacer (ITS) regions (ITS1, ITS2) and the conserved 5.8S comprehensive morphological comparisons between gene of the ribosomal RNA (rDNA) operon were the collections were not possible at the time amplified with the primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 (White et (Vermeulen et al. 2011). al. 1990). A portion of the elongation factor 1 a (TEF1a) The five distinct subclades in Celoporthe from Africa, gene was amplified with primers EF1-728 and EF986R observed by Nakabonge et al. (2006a) and Vermeulen (Carbone and Kohn 1999). et al. (2011), could represent five cryptic species PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 mL similar to the species described from China and comprising 40 ng DNA template, 0.5 mM each primer, Indonesia (Chen et al. 2011). The aim of this study 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.5 U Super-term polymerase Taq was to determine whether more than one species of (Southern Cross Biotechnology, Cape Town, South Africa), 103 dilution buffer, 1 mL MgCl (Southern Cross Biotech- Celoporthe is present in Africa based on newly available 2 nology, Cape Town, South Africa) and sterile distilled water collections, multilocus DNA sequence data and mor- (18 mL). PCR were carried out on a thermal-cycler (Master phological comparisons. Furthermore, we considered cycleH Perkin Elmer Corp., Massachusetts) and included an whether they differ in pathogenicity on a Eucalyptus initial denaturation step at 94 C for 3 min, followed by 40 clone and S. cordatum seedlings in the greenhouse. amplification cycles consisting of 30 s at 94 C, 45 sec of annealing at 55 C for bT1, ITS and TEF1a, 65 C for BT 2, and 1 min at 72 C followed by 4 min at 72 C to ensure MATERIALS AND METHODS elongation of the fragments. PCR products were viewed with Fungal isolates.—Isolates of C. dispersa (Nakabonge et al. UV light on 1% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide to 2006a) were obtained from the culture

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us