FREE EXPLAINING INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: AMBIGUITY, AGENCY, AND POWER PDF James Mahoney,Kathleen Thelen | 254 pages | 18 May 2010 | CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780521134323 | English | Cambridge, United Kingdom A Gradual Theory of Institutional Change — Northwestern Scholars Tente novamente Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity tarde. Adicionar coautores Coautores. Carregar PDF. PDF Restaurar Eliminar Agency. Seguir este autor. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity artigos deste autor. Novos artigos relacionados Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity a pesquisa deste autor. Coautores Dietrich Rueschemeyer Email confirmado em brown. Tulia Falleti University of Pennsylvania Email confirmado em sas. Colin Elman Syracuse University Email confirmado em syr. Jennifer Cyr University of Arizona Email confirmado em email. Artigos Citado por Coautores. Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and Agency 1, Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, Studies in comparative international development 36 1, Comparative political studies 40 2, Artigos 1—20 Mostrar mais. Ajuda Privacidade Termos. Path and Power in historical sociology J Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity Theory and society 29 4, A theory of gradual institutional change J Mahoney, K Thelen Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power 1, A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research J Mahoney, G Goertz Political analysis, Aligning ontology and Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity in comparative research PA Hall, J Mahoney, D Rueschemeyer Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research J Mahoney, G Goertz Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity political science review, Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method J Mahoney Sociological forum, Comparative historical analysis J Mahoney, D Rueschemeyer Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective J Mahoney Studies in comparative international development 36 1, Comparative-historical methodology J Mahoney Annu. Qualitative methodology and comparative politics J Mahoney Comparative political studies 40 2, Strategies of causal assessment in comparative historical analysis J Mahoney Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power by James Mahoney Some in the social sciences argue that the same logic applies to both qualitative Agency quantitative methods. In A Tale of Two CulturesGary Goertz and James Mahoney demonstrate that these two paradigms constitute different cultures, each internally coherent yet marked by contrasting norms, practices, and toolkits. They identify and discuss major differences between these two traditions that touch nearly every aspect of social science research, including design, and Power, causal effects and models, concepts and measurement, data analysis, and case selection. Although focused on the differences Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity qualitative and quantitative research, Goertz and Mahoney also seek to promote toleration, exchange, and learning by enabling scholars to think beyond their own culture and see an alternative scientific worldview. This book is written in an easily accessible style and features a and Power of real-world examples to illustrate methodological points. Despite their many similarities, Central American countries during the twentieth century were characterized by remarkably different political regimes. In a comparative analysis of Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Honduras, and Nicaragua, James Mahoney argues that these political differences were legacies of the nineteenth-century liberal reform period. Presenting a theory of "path dependence," Mahoney shows how choices made at crucial turning points in Central American history established certain directions of change and foreclosed others to shape long-term development. By the middle of the twentieth century, three types of political regimes characterized the five nations considered in and Power study: military- authoritarian Guatemala, El Salvadorliberal democratic Costa Ricaand traditional dictatorial Honduras, Nicaragua. As Mahoney shows, each type is the end point of choices regarding state and agrarian development made by these countries early in the nineteenth century. Applying his conclusions to present-day attempts at market creation in a neoliberal era, Mahoney warns that overzealous pursuit of market creation can have severely negative long-term political consequences. The Legacies of Liberalism presents new insight and Power the role Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity leadership in political development, the place of domestic politics in the analysis Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity foreign intervention, and the role of the state in the creation of early capitalism. The book offers a general theoretical framework that will be of broad interest to scholars of comparative politics and political development, and its overall Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity will stir debate among historians of particular Central American countries. Se Agency producido un problema al guardar and Power preferencias de cookies. Aceptar cookies Personalizar cookies. Agency Mahoney. Se ha producido un error. Prueba a realizar la solicitud de nuevo. Previous page. Tapa blanda. Next page. Libros de James Mahoney. Against the backdrop Agency an explosion of interest in new techniques for data collection and theory testing, this volume provides a fresh programmatic statement about comparative-historical analysis. It examines the advances and distinctive contributions that CHA has made to theory generation and the explanation of large-scale outcomes that newer approaches often regard as empirically intractable. An introductory essay locates the sources of CHA's enduring and Power in core characteristics that distinguish this approach, such as its attention to process and its commitment to empirically grounded, deep case-based research. Subsequent chapters explore broad research programs inspired by CHA Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, new analytic tools for studying temporal processes and institutional dynamics, and recent methodological tools for analyzing sequences and for combining CHA work with other approaches. This volume is essential reading for scholars seeking to and Power about the sources of CHA's enduring influence and its contemporary analytical and methodological techniques. Otros formatos: Tapa duraTapa blanda. IVA incluido si corresponde. In this comparative-historical analysis of Spanish Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Mahoney offers a new theory of colonialism and postcolonial development. He explores why certain kinds of societies are subject to certain kinds of colonialism and why these forms of colonialism give rise to countries with differing levels of economic prosperity and social well-being. Mahoney contends that differences in the extent of colonialism are best explained by the potentially evolving fit between the institutions of the colonizing nation and those of the colonized society. Moreover, he shows how institutions forged under colonialism bring countries to relative levels of development that may prove remarkably enduring in the postcolonial period. The argument is sure to stir discussion and debate, both among experts on Spanish America who believe that development is not tightly bound by the colonial past, and among scholars of colonialism who suggest that the institutional identity of the colonizing nation is of little consequence. This book contributes to emerging debates in political science and sociology on institutional change. Its introductory essay proposes a new framework for analyzing incremental change that is grounded in a power-distributional view of institutions and that emphasizes ongoing struggles within but also over prevailing institutional arrangements. Five empirical essays then bring the general theory to life by evaluating its causal propositions in the context of sustained Agency of specific instances of incremental change. These essays range widely across substantive topics and across times and Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, including cases from the United States, Africa, Latin America, and Asia. The book closes with a chapter reflecting on the possibilities for productive Agency in the analysis of change among scholars associated with different theoretical approaches to institutions. This book systematically investigates the past accomplishments and future agendas of contemporary comparative-historical and Power. Its core essays explore three major issues: the accumulation of knowledge in the field over the past three decades, the analytic tools used to study temporal process and historical patterns, and the methodologies available for making inferences and for building theories. The introductory and concluding essays situate the field as a whole by comparing it to alternative approaches within the social sciences. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences will serve as an invaluable resource for scholars in the field, and it will represent a challenge to many other social scientists - especially those who have raised skeptical concerns about comparative-historical analysis