Spectral Coherence and the Laser Linewidth

Spectral Coherence and the Laser Linewidth

Spectral Coherence and the Laser Linewidth Markus Pollnau Department of Materials and Nano Physics KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Resonator Mode We assume a laterally fundamental, single longitudinal mode in one polarization (“the mode”), centered at frequency nL. 2 Mode volume: Vwmode 0 with length l and beam waist w0. All population densities and rates per unit time are averaged over the mode volume. Speed of light: c c0 nr in the medium of refractive index nr that homogeneously fills the mode volume. 12 Resonator round-trip time: tRT Dn FSR c with free spectral range DnFSR KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Resonator Losses, Photon Decay Time Tout 0 Outcoupling of light: 1 ln 1 Tout Tout (with mirror transmission Tout) outtt RT RT L 0 1 ln 1 L RT L Intrinsic round-trip loss: RT RT tt (with loss constant LRT) loss RT RT 1 1 1 Photon decay time: c out loss 1 Photon decay rate: Rdecay j c Photon decay per round trip: (with number j of photons in the mode) tRT c t RT out t RT loss jt0 tRT j t 0 e j t 0 e e j t 0 11 T out L RT KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Decay Time vs. Coherence Time 1.5 Exponential decay time c 1 c defined from zero to infinity! 0.5 0 coh -0.5 Coherence time cc 2 defined from -1 -1.5 minus infinity to infinity! units] [arb. Field Electric 0 50 100 150 200 Time [arb. units] 1.5 coh cc 2 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 Electric Field [arb. units] [arb. Field Electric -1.5 -200 -100 0 100 200 Time [arb. units] KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Lorentzian-shaped Spectral Line Time domain: t c Exponential decay with decay time c : jjt t0 e Fourier transform of its amplitude: 2 1 1it2 n n L 1 1 c n j t e dt 22 2 c j t0 t0 c 42n nLc Frequency domain: 2 Dn Lorentzian line shape with linewidth Dn : n c c c 2 2 4n nLc D n Relationship between linewidth, photon-decay time, coherence time: 11 Dn c coh 2 c c KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Decay Time vs. Linewidth Relationship decay time / linewidth: 1.0 1.0 tau1 = 0.32 ms f1 0.8 0.8 f2 tau2 = 0.08 ms 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 Intensity (arb. units) Lorentzian Lorentzian Function 0.0 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 -20 -10 0 10 20 Time (ms) 11Angular Frequency (kHz) Dn c coh 2 c c KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Q-Factor The quality factor (Q-factor) of any resonator (be it mechanical, electrical, optical, …) is defined as: the energy stored in the resonator divided by the energy lost per oscillation cycle E t j t Q : 2stored 2 2 n n coh cEt 1 d L c L c lost j t n L dt Energy: E t hnj t 11 n Fourier transform: L Dn cc coh Q 2cc c D n KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Q-Factor Two equivalent definitions: Et E n Q: 2stored 2 n Q 2 stored L cE t L c c E Dn lost injectedcw c Measurement by: inserting a short pulse inserting broadband cw and observing its decay light and measuring the (“cavity ring-down measurement”) (Fabry-Pérot) linewidth c Dnc KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Spectral Coherence in a Passive Mode Mode passive Q-factor Qc ×n -1 Linewidth (Dnc) ×2 Photon decay time c ×1/2 coh Coherence time c ×1/c coh Coherence length lc KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Stimulated Emission (and Absorption) 1,1 1,0 We assume that the transition cross sections 0,9 0,8 do not vary significantly over the spectral 0,7 linewidth of the lasing mode at frequency n . 0,6 L [normalized] 0,5 q , 0,4 e 0,3 0,2 Emission cross section: se 0,1 0,0 -0,003 -0,002 -0,001 0,000 0,001 0,002 0,003 (n-n )/n Absorption cross section: sa e e Population density of upper laser level: N2 Population density of lower laser level: N1 Optical net gain per unit length: gssea N21 N Stimulated-emission rate per unit time: Rst cgj KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Photon Rates and Rate Equation Number of photons in lasing mode: j Stimulated-emission rate per unit time: 1 Photon-decay rate per unit time: Rdecay j c d 1 cw Photon rate equation: jRst R decay cg j j 0 dt c 1 Consequence: “The gain equals the losses!” cg c Rst cgj KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group CW Laser: Gain Equals Losses ? The assumption that in a cw laser the gain equals the losses is only an approximation which is often (but not always) fine to obtain with good accuracy laser threshold and slope efficiency. Its consequences are that 1) the laser would emit a pure sine wave with an infinite coherence length, 2) its linewidth would become a delta function, 3) its Q-factor would assume an infinite value, 4) the photon number would build up and coherence would manifest itself only above threshold, and 5) the threshold inversion would depend only on the total resonator losses, but be independent of other decay channels. None of these implications holds true for any laser that mankind has ever created! KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Atomic Behavior in an External Field A. Einstein, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917) Absorption Stimulated Emission Spontaneous Emission E2, N2, 2 E2, N2, 2 E2, N2, 2 E1, N1 E1, N1 E1, N1 Stimulated processes Spontaneous process (driven by an external field) (driven by vacuum fluctuations) Obviously we have neglected spontaneous emission! KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Spontaneous vs. Stimulated Emission With one vacuum photon per mode, j 0 1 , the spontaneous-emission rate becomes Rsp cs e N2 j 0 c s e N 2 In a 4-level laser: 4level Stimulated-emission rate: Rst cgj c s e N2 j The rate constants cN s e 2 are identical, because spontaneous emission is stimulated emission driven by vacuum fluctuations ! 4level RRcgcN j s cN s j cNcN s s j 1 st sp e2 e 2 e 2 e 2 You find this “extra” photon, representing spontaneous emission, in the textbooks on lasers by Siegman or Svelto (and others). (In a 3-level laser, there is absorption of photons from the lower laser level, which has no equivalent in spontaneous absorption.) KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group CW Laser: Gain is Smaller than Losses! Photon rate equation without / with spontaneous emission: d 1 cw j R R cg j j 0 dt st decay c d 1 cw jRsp R st R decay c s e N2 cg j j 0 dt c The spontaneous-emission and stimulated-emission rates together compensate the loss rate. Consequence: “The gain is smaller than the losses!” 1 Rdecay R st R sp or cgjs c e N2 c KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Decay of Photons in Lasing Mode Since in a cw laser the gain is smaller than the losses, cw1 cw Rdecay R st R sp or cgjs c e N2 c photons present in the lasing resonator mode at any given time t1 decay according to: d 11cw t1 t 1 t 1 jt Rdecay R st cg j t j t 0 dt cL The gain elongates the photon-decay time from c in the passive resonator to L in the lasing resonator : 1 Lc 1 cg c KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept. of Materials and Nano Physics [email protected] Integrated Devices Group Laser Coherence Time and Linewidth Because of gain, the photon-decay time is elongated from c in the passive mode to L in the lasing mode: Rdecay 1 cL or Rdecay R st1 cg c Consequently, the laser coherence time is elongated: cohRdecay 1 coh c2 c or L 2 L Rdecay R st1 cg c Fourier transform the laser linewidth is narrowed: 11RRdecay st Dnc or 1 cg c D n L 22cR decay L KTH Royal Institute of Technology Markus Pollnau Rare-Earth Lasers and Dept.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us