Noether charge and black hole entropy in teleparallel gravity F. Hammad,1, 2, 3, ∗ D. Dijamco,1, † A. Torres-Rivas,4,1, ‡ and D. B´erub´e2, § 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bishop’s University, 2600 College Street, Sherbrooke, QC, J1M 1Z7 Canada 2Physics Department, Champlain College-Lennoxville, 2580 College Street, Sherbrooke, QC, J1M 0C8 Canada 3D´epartement de Physique, Universit´ede Montr´eal, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit,´ Montr´eal, QC, H3T 1J4 Canada 4D´epartement de Physique, Universit´ede Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2X9 Canada The Noether charge associated to diffeomorphism invariance in teleparallel gravity is derived. It is shown that the latter yields the ADM mass of an asymptotically flat spacetime. The black hole entropy is then investigated based on Wald’s prescription that relies on the Noether charge. It is shown that, like in general relativity, the surface gravity can be factored out from such a charge. Consequently, the similarity with the first law of thermodynamics implied by such an approach in general relativity does show up also in teleparallel gravity. It is found that, based on the expression of the first law of black hole mechanics, which is preserved in teleparallel gravity, entropy can thus be extracted from such a Noether charge. The resulting entropy can very naturally be expressed as a volume integral, though. As such, it is shown that the conformal issue that plagues the entropy-area law within general relativity does not arise in teleparallel gravity based on Wald’s approach. The physics behind these features is discussed. PACS numbers: 04.20.Cv, 04.50.Kd, 04.70.-s I. INTRODUCTION makes it possible to come up with extensions of GR to tackle the problems of dark matter [10, 11] and cosmology Two of the major motivations that are often put for- [12]. ward in the search for gravitational theories beyond gen- The feature of TEGR that makes it simpler than GR eral relativity (GR) are the quantization problem and the is its first order Lagrangian as well as its Yang-Mills-like dark energy and/or dark matter problems. The usual field equations. This feature arises thanks to the use of cure suggested to these problems consists in modifying the frame fields which can be thought of as representing the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian (see e.g., the very re- the “square root” of the metric. The main feature of the cent review in Ref. [1]). Thus, nonlinear functionals of TEGR framework that makes it richer than that of GR the Ricci scalar R and other geometric invariants, as well [13] is the fact that, unlike in GR, one is able to sep- as extra degrees of freedom for spacetime, such as torsion arate gravitational effects from inertial effects. This is and scalar fields, are often added inside the simple GR achieved thanks to the spin connection that is contained Lagrangian. However, while these extra terms and enti- inside the Weitzenb¨ock connection. This is a unique fea- ties do indeed enrich the theory, they do make the gravi- ture to teleparallel theories of gravity in general [1, 14], tational action, let alone the field equations, exceedingly and TEGR in particular, that is not shared by any other complex. In addition, any specific extra term added to alternative theories of gravity. This feature of the theory the GR Lagrangian automatically begs for a justification is behind the remarkable possibility of defining an energy- from first principles. In this regard, the only theory that momentum tensor for the gravitational field [15, 16]. It is arXiv:1912.08811v1 [gr-qc] 19 Dec 2019 is equivalent to GR, and yet simpler and richer than GR, thus of great interest to investigate within this theory the is arguably the so-called teleparallel equivalent to general fate of black hole thermodynamics as well. In fact, the relativity (TEGR) (see Ref. [2] for a textbook introduc- problem of black hole entropy with its peculiar area-law tion and Ref. [3] for a review). character is of tremendous importance as it depends — in TEGR is known to incorporate the nice features of GR, contrast to temperature — on the dynamics of spacetime such as the possibility of studying conserved currents [4] rather than on the kinematics of the latter. Thereby, with and nonvacuum solutions [5]. Furthermore, TEGR has its capacity for splitting the dynamics into inertial effects been shown to be an adequate framework for studying plus purely gravitational effects, TEGR constitutes prob- gravitational waves [6, 7], nonsingular black holes [8] and ably the best framework in which one might still hope to energy fluxes in cylindrical spacetimes [9]. TEGR also learn more about black hole entropy at the classical level. It has recently been shown in Ref. [17] that the analogy between the first law of black hole mechanics and thermo- ∗ [email protected] dynamics becomes spoiled under a Weyl conformal trans- † [email protected] formation of spacetime. One of the reasons is that the ‡ [email protected] area-law character of black hole entropy becomes prob- § [email protected] lematic. It was found indeed that, in contrast to a surface 2 area, the black hole entropy based on Wald’s approach In other words, is it possible that in a theory, like TEGR, remains invariant under a conformal transformation. In in which inertia can be separated from gravity, black hole Ref. [18], it was shown in this regard that even the ex- entropy could also be “purified” from inertial effects and traction of Einstein’s field equations based on Jacobson’s allowed to reveal its true nature? Our aim in this paper is prescription [19] becomes problematic. A first clue of to investigate such a question in detail. Furthermore, to the general issue is actually provided by the observa- the best of our knowledge the Noether charge approach tion that under conformal transformations of spacetime a has not been previously applied to TEGR. black hole horizon might disappear altogether [20] and a The following sections of the paper are organized as wormhole, which requires the violation of the null energy follows. In Sec. II, we introduce the main definitions condition (NEC) by matter, becomes sustained without and equations of TEGR. We then use these to extract violating the NEC as soon as one transforms spacetime the symplectic potential from which the Noether charge `ala Weyl [21]. The very root of the problem can there- associated with the diffeomorphism invariance of the the- fore be traced back to the fundamental dichotomy be- ory can be derived according to Wald’s prescription. In tween matter and geometry that is inherent in Einstein’s Sec. III, we show that such a Noether charge provides the field equations. As matter and geometry behave differ- gravitational energy of an asymptotically flat spacetime ently under a conformal transformation [22, 23], a Weyl which is just the familiar ADM mass derived from GR. In transformation necessarily filters out the material enti- Sec. IV, we use the Noether charge to extract the black ties from the geometric ones in any dynamical relation hole entropy. In Sec. V, we examine the behavior of such that involves both of them. an entropy under Weyl transformations. We conclude In light of this first clue revealed by the Weyl trans- this paper with a brief summary and discussion section. formation, our goal in this paper is to use TEGR to re- fine this picture by investigating how much the intricate II. NOETHER CHARGE IN TEGR relation between inertia and geometry is responsible in shaping black hole entropy. In fact, on the one hand, we have the simple dichotomy between matter and geome- Like all teleparallel gravity theories, TEGR is a try that betrays the fundamental nature of the entropy diffeomorphism-invariant theory. Therefore, to extract area law when examined through the lens of Weyl trans- the Noether charge associated to its diffeomorphism in- 1 formations. On the other hand, inertia, being an inti- variance we apply Wald’s algorithm [24, 25] . The first mate property of pure matter, becomes “unfortunately” step of the algorithm is to write down the Lagrangian of geometrized in GR along with pure gravity. It is there- the theory in the language of differential forms. fore very tempting to believe that within a framework in The dynamical field in TEGR is the frame (or tetrad, a which gravitational and inertial effects could be made dis- or vierbein) field eµ(x), defined through its relation to a b tinct, another picture of black hole entropy could emerge. the metric gµν (x) of curved spacetime by, gµν = ηabeµeν , 2 Indeed, as mentioned above, TEGR is already known where ηab is the flat Minkowski metric . The inverse µ µ a µ to offer, in contrast to GR, a framework in which the vierbein fields are denoted by ea such that, ea eν = δν and µ b b energy-momentum density for the gravitational field is ea eµ = δa. Then, the metric determinant g is expressed a well defined. This is made possible in TEGR thanks as √ g = det(eµ) e. The affine connection of TEGR − ≡ µ to the separability of the energy-momentum density’s is the Weitzenb¨ock connection Γνρ, given in terms of the a pseudotensor of inertial effects from the purely ten- frame fields and the spin connection ωµ b(x) by, sorial gravitational contribution [2]. Remarkably, the µ µ a µ a b Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) mass obtained from such Γνρ = ea ∂ρeν + ea ωρ b eν . (1) an energy-momentum tensor of the gravitational field is In contrast to Einstein-Cartan gravity, the spin con- more naturally expressed as a volume integral [15, 16], in a nection ωµ b(x) in TEGR is chosen to be a purely in- contrast to what is found within GR where it takes the ertial Lorentz connection.