109th CONGRESS Printed for the use of the 2d Session Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe UZBEKISTAN: ARE THERE PROSPECTS FOR CHANGE? July 25, 2006 Briefing of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe Washington: 2008 Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe 234 Ford House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 202–225–1901 [email protected] http://www.csce.gov Legislative Branch Commissioners HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, NEW JERSEY, SAM BROWNBACK, KANSAS, Co-Chairman Chairman FRANK R. WOLF, VIRGINIA GORDON SMITH, OREGON JOSEPH R. PITTS, PENNSYLVANIA SAXBY CHAMBLISS, GEORGIA ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, ALABAMA RICHARD BURR, NORTH CAROLINA MIKE PENCE, INDIANA DAVID VITTER, LOUISIANA BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, MARYLAND CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, CONNECTICUT LOUISE MCINTOSH SLAUGHTER, RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, WISCONSIN NEW YORK HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, NEW YORK ALCEE L. HASTINGS, FLORIDA VACANT MIKE MCINTYRE, NORTH CAROLINA Executive Branch Commissioners VACANT, DEPARTMENT OF STATE VACANT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE VACANT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (II) (2) ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE The Helsinki process, formally titled the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, traces its origin to the signing of the Helsinki Final Act in Finland on August 1, 1975, by the leaders of 33 European countries, the United States and Canada. As of January 1, 1995, the Helsinki process was renamed the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). The membership of the OSCE has expanded to 55 partici- pating States, reflecting the breakup of the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. The OSCE Secretariat is in Vienna, Austria, where weekly meetings of the partici- pating States’ permanent representatives are held. In addition, specialized seminars and meetings are convened in various locations. Periodic consultations are held among Senior Officials, Ministers and Heads of State or Government. Although the OSCE continues to engage in standard setting in the fields of military security, economic and environmental cooperation, and human rights and humanitarian concerns, the Organization is primarily focused on initiatives designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflict within and among the participating States. The Organization deploys numerous missions and field activities located in Southeastern and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. The website of the OSCE is: <www.osce.org>. ABOUT THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE The Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki Commission, is a U.S. Government agency created in 1976 to monitor and encourage compliance by the participating States with their OSCE commitments, with a particular emphasis on human rights. The Commission consists of nine members from the United States Senate, nine mem- bers from the House of Representatives, and one member each from the Departments of State, Defense and Commerce. The positions of Chair and Co-Chair rotate between the Senate and House every two years, when a new Congress convenes. A professional staff assists the Commissioners in their work. In fulfilling its mandate, the Commission gathers and disseminates relevant informa- tion to the U.S. Congress and the public by convening hearings, issuing reports that reflect the views of Members of the Commission and/or its staff, and providing details about the activities of the Helsinki process and developments in OSCE participating States. The Commission also contributes to the formulation and execution of U.S. policy regarding the OSCE, including through Member and staff participation on U.S. Delega- tions to OSCE meetings. Members of the Commission have regular contact with parliamentarians, government officials, representatives of non-governmental organiza- tions, and private individuals from participating States. The website of the Commission is: <www.csce.gov>. (III) (3) UZBEKISTAN: ARE THERE PROSPECTS FOR CHANGE? JULY 25, 2006 PARTICIPANTS Page Dorothy Douglas Taft, Deputy Chief of Staff, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Abdurahim Polat, Chairman of the Birlik Party .......................................................................... 2 Gulam Umarov, son of Sanjar Umarov, Imprisoned Chairman of the Sunshine Coalition ...... 6 Muhammad Salih, Chairman of the Erk Party ............................................................................ 8 Martha Brill Olcott, Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace ............. 10 APPENDICES Prepared statement of Abdurahim Polat ...................................................................................... 21 Prepared statement of Martha Brill Olcott .................................................................................. 27 (IV) (4) UZBEKISTAN: ARE THERE PROSPECTS FOR CHANGE? JULY 25, 2006 Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe Washington, DC The briefing was held at 4:07 p.m. in room 226 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC, Dorothy Douglas Taft, Deputy Chief of Staff, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, moderating. Panalists present: Dorothy Douglas Taft, Deputy Chief of Staff, Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe; Abdurahim Polat, Chairman of the Birlik Party; Gulam Umarov, son of Sanjar Umarov, imprisoned Chairman of the Sunshine Coalition; Muhammad Salih, Chairman of the ERK Party; and Dr. Martha Brill Olcott, Senior Asso- ciate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Ms. TAFT. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Dorothy Taft, and I serve as the Deputy Chief of Staff for the Helsinki Commission. And on behalf of our Chairman, Senator Sam Brownback, and our Co-Chairman, Congressman Chris Smith, I want to welcome each one of you here today for this briefing regarding Uzbekistan entitled, ‘‘Are There Prospects for Change?’’ And we appreciate each of you taking the time to be with us, and we especially appreciate our presenters today, who are here to help inform us of the situation. Our purpose today is to examine whether, after almost 20 years of President Karimov’s rule, there are any prospects for positive change in Uzbekistan. For many years, Uzbekistan has been a repressive, authoritarian state without legal opposition or any tolerance for dissenting viewpoints. But since the events in Andijon in May of last year, the situation in that long-suf- fering country has deteriorated still further. The countrywide crackdown on human rights activists, religious groups, and members of opposition parties and movements has contin- ued. Scores of them have been arrested. And just in the last few days, we’ve learned of the disappearance of Talib Yakubov, the leader of the Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan. Helsinki Commission staff, including myself, have known him and dealt with him for many years now, since 1991. Mr. Yakubov has bravely persevered in his campaign to monitor rights violations, despite threats, harassment and continuous intimidation, not to mention the arrests and beatings of many of his colleagues, and even the deaths of some of them. We anxiously await word on his whereabouts and his well-being. (1) Given the situation in Uzbekistan, the timeliness of our briefing today is quite obvious. As it happens, among our speakers are individuals who know all too well the mechanics of Uzbek repression. In 1992, Dr. Abdurahim Polat, leader of Birlik, was almost killed on a Tashkent street by thugs. The same year, he had to flee his homeland, which he has not seen since. Muhammad Salih, the leader of ERK, was also forced into exile, where he has remained ever since. His brothers, however, were arrested and suffered in Uzbek jails, where two of them remain. Gulam Umarov’s father, Sanjay Umarov, the leader of the Sunshine Coalition, is also today in prison. When I was in Tashkent in February, I did observe part of his court pro- ceedings. Clearly, attempting to engage in opposition activity in Uzbekistan is very dangerous. The personal experiences of these three panelists lend their testimony a special weight and poignancy. To round out viewpoints, we have also invited Dr. Martha Olcott, a preeminent analyst on Central Asia. Thankfully, she has managed to study the region for the last quarter-century in relative safety, though not without many adventures. I am sure she will give our discussion a big-picture perspective and the benefit of comparative analysis. The Congress, for its part, is working to craft a U.S. response to the Andijon killings and the increased repression by the Uzbek Government. In May, Chairman Brownback introduced the Silk Road Strategy Act of 2006, which lays out guidelines for how U.S. policy toward Afghanistan and the Central Asian countries and the Caucasus should be crafted in the area of economics, security and democratization. Also, Co-Chairman Smith has introduced the Central Asia Democracy and Human Rights Promotion Act, H.R. 5382. In addition to providing funding for increased human rights work in the region, this legislation would place sanctions on Uzbekistan by creating a visa ban, an arms ban, and an asset freeze on President Karimov, other regime leaders and their families. It has been marked up in Mr. Smith’s subcommittee of the Inter- national Relations Committee in the House, just before the July 4th recess, and we await its further consideration