Satellite Tracking of Magellanic Penguin Migration’

Satellite Tracking of Magellanic Penguin Migration’

376 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS BIRKHEAD,T R., AND A. I? MILLER. 1992. Numbers stimulate late summer breeding in the Pition Jay. and size of sperm storagetubules and the duration Nature 250:80-82. of sperm storage in birds: a comparative study. MOORE,E R., AND P KERLINGER.1987. Stopover and Biol. J. Linn. Sot. 45:363-372. fat deposition by North American wood-warblers BLANCHER,P, A. CYR, S. DROEGE,D. HUSSELL,AND L. (Parulinae) following spring migration over the THOMAS.1993. Results of a U.S./Canada work- Gulf of Mexico. Oecologia 74:47-54. shop on monitoring of landbirds during migration MOORE,E R., AND M. V MCDONALD. 1993. On the and recommendationstowards a North American possibility that intercontinentallandbird migrants Migration Monitoring Program (MMP). Natl. copulate en route. Auk 110:157-160. Biol. Survey, Washington,DC. PROCTOR,N. S., AND P. J. LYNCH. 1993. Manual of BRISKIE,J. V 1994. Seasonalpatterns of sperm stor- ornithology: avian structure and function. Yale age in the Yellow-headed Blackbird Xanthoceph- Univ. Press, New Haven, CT. alus xanthocephalus. Ibis 136:323-330. PYLE, P, S. N. G. HOWELL,R. F! YUNICK,AND D. E BRISKIE,J. V. 1996. Lack of sperm storageby female DESANTE. 1987. Identification guide to North migrants and the significance of copulations en American passerines.Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, route. Condor 98:414-417. CA. BROOKS,E. W. 1994. Braddock Bay Bird Observato- QUAY, W. B. 1984. Cloaca1lavage of sperm: a tech- ;;;e;pFyg 1994 passerine banding report. Roch- nique for evaluation of reproductive activity. N. Am. Bird Bander 9:2-7. 3 . DELIUS,J. D. 1965. A population study of Skylarks QUAY,W. B. 1985a. Cloaca1sperm in spring migrants: occurrence and interpretation. Condor 87:273- Alauda arvensis. Ibis 107:466492. 280. DRENT,R. H., AND S. DAAN. 1980. The prudent par- QUAY, W. B. 1985b. Sperm release in migrating ent: energetic adjustmentsin avian breeding. AI- wood-warblers (Parulinae) nesting at higher lati- dea 68:225-252. tudes. Wilson Bull. 97:283-295. GUDMUNDSSON,G. A., A. LINDSTROM,AND T. ALER- QUAY, W. B. 1986. Timing and location of spring STAM. 1991. Optimal fat loads and long-distance soerm release in northern thrushes.Wilson Bull. flights by migrating Knots Calidris canutus, Sand- 98:526-534. erlings C. alba, and TurnstonesArenaria inter- QUAY, W. B. 1989. Insemination of TennesseeWar- pres. Ibis 133:140-152. blers during spring migration. Condor 91:660- HATCH,S. A. 1983. Mechanism and ecological sig- h7n nificance of sperm storagein the Northern Fulmar RICKLEFS,- - ’ R. E. 1974. Energetics of reproductionin with reference to its occurrence in other birds. birds, p. 152-292. In R. A. Paynter [ed.], Avian Auk 100:593-600. energetics.Publ. Nuttall Omithol. Sot. 15., Cam- KUENZI,A. J., E R. MOORE,AND T. R. SIMONS. 1991. bridge, MA. Stopoverof Neotropical landbird migrantson East WALSBERG,G. E. 1983. Avian ecological energetics, Ship Island following trans-gulf migration. Con- p. 161-220. In D. S. Farner,J. R. King, and K. C. dor 93:869-883. Parks [eds.], Avian biology. Vol. 7. Academic LIGON, J. D. 1974. Green cones of the pifion pine Press, New York. The Condor 100:376-381 0 The Cooper Omlthological Society 1998 SATELLITE TRACKING OF MAGELLANIC PENGUIN MIGRATION’ DAVID L. STOKESAND F! DEE BOERSMA Department of Zoology, Box 351800, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 9819.5, e-mail: [email protected] LLOYD S. DAVIS Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand Abstract. We tracked four male Magellanic Pen- Argentina where they had bred and molted, all four guins (Spheniscus magellanicus) from the beginningof birds traveled northeastalong the coast at speedscon- their winter migration for periods ranging from three sistent with sighting and band-return data which sug- to six weeks. Upon leaving the colony at PuntaTombo, gest a round-trip winter migration in this speciesof up to several thousandkilometers. Three of the birds fol- lowed a similar route, moved at approximately the ’ ’ Received 15 May 1997. Accepted 6 January 1998. same rate, and were still moving northeastwardat a SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 377 distance of over 800 km from the colony when signals devices (attached to males #l-3) were 0.25-watt mi- ceased. The fourth bird departed from the northeast croprocessor-controlled satellite-linked time-depth re- route at approximately 306 km into its trip and re- corder/transmitters manufactured by Wildlife Comput- mained in a large bav for at least 29 davs. when the ers Inc. (Redmond. WA) using Telonics ST-10 trans- last signal was”rece&ed. Initially, the birds traveled mitters. These devices, including waterproof epoxy rapidly and made few deep dives. Later, their rate of housing, each weighed approximately 155 g, and had travel slowed, their paths became more erratic, and a cross-sectional area of 13.5 cm2, approximately 7- they made more deep dives, all indications of probable 8% of the cross-sectional area of a male Magellanic foraging. This suggests that location of the penguin Penguin. The fourth device (attached to male #4) was migration route and rate of travel along it may be de- manufactured by Sirtrack Ltd. (Havelock North, New termined by seasonal movement of prey. As all birds Zealand) and also used a Telonics ST-10 transmitter were within 250 km of shore for the entire period in packed in an epoxy housing. It weighed 96 g and had which signals were received, our results underscore the a cross-sectional area of 6.5 cm2. We used fast-setting importance of controlling pollution associated with pe- epoxy to attach the devices to the feathers in the center troleum transport along the coast of Argentina, cur- of the penguin’s lower back. All devices had sloped rently a major source of Magellanic Penguin mortality. leading and trailing faces and were positioned poste- rior to the line of maximum girth to minimize drag Key words: Magellanic Penguin, migration, pen- (Bannasch et al. 1994). guins, satellite telemetry, Spheniscus magellanicus. We programmed the Wildlife Computer devices to transmit at 45-set intervals every other day, primarily As with other penguins, little is known of Magellanic during the night-time hours most likely to coincide Penguins’ (Spheniscus magellanicus) activities during with satellite passes. At night, Magellanic Penguins the nonbreeding season. After chicks fledge, breeding tend to rest at the ocean surface and hence the trans- adults undergo a synchronous molt in March and April mitter signal is less likely to be broken due to sub- and then leave the breeding colony, not to return until merging of the antenna (P D. Boersma, unpubl. data). the following September or October. Their where- The Sirtrack device was pre-set to transmit at 60.set abouts during this 5-to-6 month period have been in- intervals for 6 hr every 72 hr. In addition to location, ferred from sightings of unmarked birds as well as the Wildlife Computer devices recorded frequencies of band returns, mostly from dead birds that have washed dives in six depth classes (3-5, 6-10, 11-20, 21-40, ashore. These methods indicate that Magellanic Pen- 41-60. and 61-80 m) for 6-hr oeriods (03:00-09:OO. guins migrate northward in the winter (Daciuk 1977), 09:00~15:00, etc. local time) ea’ch day. ~ in some cases apparently more than 2,000 km (I? D. We received transmissions through the Service AR- Boersma, unpubl. data). However, sightings of un- GOS satellite system. Sixty-one percent (n = 86) of marked birds give no indication of breeding status or locations received (n = 140) were based upon at least colony of origin, and band returns yield imprecise lo- four messages per satellite pass and were accurate to cations of live birds and give little indication of pattern within 1 km (location class 1 or better; ARGOS 1996). of movement or distance from shore of migrating The accuracy of the remainder of locations could not birds. Such information is important for the protection be determined with certainty (ARGOS 1996); however of this species, which is currently declining (Boersma based upon locations received for birds at known po- 1997) primarily due to human activities at sea, chiefly sitions (Stokes and Boersma, in press), locations cal- commercial fishing and oil pollution (Gandini et al. culated from three messages per pass (class 0 and class 1994, Boersma and Stokes 1995). A, n = 45) are sufficiently accurate for the purposes The recent development of a practical technique for of this study (mean error 2 SD = 2.9 2 3.6 km, n = tracking penguins at sea using satellite telemetry has 12). We did not use locations based upon fewer than the potential to improve our understanding of penguin three messages (class B and Z, n = 9). For the pur- migration by providing precise day-to-day monitoring poses of calculating travel speed, we used only loca- of live individuals of known breeding site, sex, age, tions of class 1 or better. Maps of travel routes (Figs. and breeding status. Studies using this-technique (Ker- 1 and 2) were made, and distances and swimming ry et al. 1995, Davis et al. 1996) have documented speeds calculated, using Arc/Info geographic infor- long-distance post-breeding migration in Adelie Pen- mation software (ESRI 1992). Values presented are guins (Pygoscelis adeliae) in the Antarctic and have means ? SD. described the routes followed bv individuals in the ear- ly part of the migration. Here-we report on the first RESULTS use of satellite telemetry to track the migration of a temperate penguin species, the Magellanic Penguin. Upon leaving the colony, all birds initially traveled northeast (Fig.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us