Court Review, Volume 46, Issue 4 (Complete)

Court Review, Volume 46, Issue 4 (Complete)

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association American Judges Association 2010 Court Review, Volume 46, Issue 4 (Complete) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview "Court Review, Volume 46, Issue 4 (Complete)" (2010). Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association. 339. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/339 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the American Judges Association at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CourtCourt ReviewReviewVolume 46, Issue 4 THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATION Iowa’s 2010 Judicial Election: Appropriate Accountability or Rampant Passion?Passion? BreakingBreaking Impasses in Settlement Conferences Recent Civil Decisions of the United States Supreme Court Court ReviewVolume 46, Issue 4 THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORS BOOK REVIEW Judge Steve Leben Kansas Court of Appeals 116 Fugitive Justice: Slavery and the Law in Pre-Civil War America Professor Alan Tomkins Karen Arnold-Burger University of Nebraska ASSISTANT TO THE EDITORS ARTICLES Kate Lorenz Kansas Court of Appeals 118 Iowa’s 2010 Judicial Election: Appropriate Accountability or EDITORIAL BOARD Rampant Passion? Kelly Lynn Anders Roy A. Schotland Creighton University Judge Karen Arnold-Burger Overland Park, Kansas 130 Breaking Impasses in Judicial Settlement Conferences: Seven (More) Techniques for Resolution Judge B. Michael Dann Morton Denlow National Institute of Justice Julie Kunce Field Fort Collins, Colorado 136 Selected Cases from the United States Supreme Court’s 2009-2010 Term Tim J. Davis Mark D. Hinderks Leawood, Kansas DEPARTMENTS Judge Leslie G. Johnson American Institute for Justice 114 Editor’s Note Steven Lubet Northwestern University 115 President’s Column Judge Gregory E. Mize Washington, D.C. 152 The Resource Page Elizabeth Neeley, Ph.D. University of Nebraska NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS STAFF Charles F. Campbell Managing Editor Court Review THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATION Volume 46, Issue 4 2009-2010 Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American EDITOR’S NOTE Judges Association, invites the submission of unsolicited, original articles, essays, and book reviews. Court Review ur lead article is a thorough review of the 2010 Iowa judicial-reten- seeks to provide practical, useful information to the work- tion elections by Professor Roy Schotland, a leading authority on ing judges of the United States and Canada. In each issue, judicial elections. He provides a thorough context for the 2010 elec- we hope to provide information that will be of use to O judges in their everyday work, whether in highlighting tion cycle, a detailed discussion of what took place during the Iowa campaign new procedures or methods of trial, court, or case man- season, and his thoughts about the likely impact from the defeat of three Iowa agement, providing substantive information regarding an Supreme Court justices. area of law likely to be encountered by many judges, or by Professor Schotland has been following judicial-selection systems, includ- providing background information (such as psychology or ing elections, for decades. He has authored five amicus briefs for the other social science research) that can be used by judges Conference of Chief Justices, including an influential brief in Caperton v. A.T. in their work. Guidelines for the submission of manu- scripts for Court Review are set forth on page 149. Court Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252 (2009). We think you’ll find his review of Review reserves the right to edit, condense, or reject mate- the 2010 Iowa election worthy of careful consideration. rial submitted for publication. Please note on the facing page in AJA president Mary Celeste’s column that the AJA will be hosting a symposium aimed at Advertising: Court Review accepts advertising for prod- ucts and services of interest to judges. For information, educating judges about judicial-retention contact January Serda at (757) 259-1864. issues and methods, as well as a workshop to teach judges about what they can do to keep Photo credit: Mary Watkins (mayrswatkinsphoto@earth- both their own jobs and an independent judi- link.net). The cover photo is of a building called Ali’iolani ciary. Hale, which is the present home of the Hawaii Supreme Court. The building once served as the seat of govern- United States Magistrate Judge Morton ment in Hawaii. The building’s courtyard features a gold- Denlow, who spends a great deal of his time leaf statute of King Kamehameha I, who established a getting cases settled, provides seven tech- kingdom in Hawaii in 1810. niques for breaking impasses during judicial ©2011, American Judges Association, printed in the settlement conferences. Judge Denlow pro- United States. Court Review is published quarterly by the vided a great article for us in 2002 on how to American Judges Association (AJA). AJA members get judicially encouraged settlements properly receive a subscription to Court Review. Non-member sub- documented. See Morton Denlow, Concluding a Successful Settlement scriptions are available for $35 per volume (four issues per volume). Subscriptions are terminable at the end of Conference: It Ain’t Over Till It’s Over, CT. REV., Fall 2002, at 14. We’re pleased any volume upon notice given to the publisher. Prices are to have him return to our pages with another practical article about how to subject to change without notice. Second-class postage achieve settlements whenever that’s at all possible. paid at Williamsburg, Virginia, and additional mailing Our final article is a review of the leading non-criminal cases from the offices. Address all correspondence about subscriptions, 2009-2010 Term of the United States Supreme Court. Kansas City lawyer Tim undeliverable copies, and change of address to Davis reviews all of the important cases involving civil procedure, the right to Association Services, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185-4147. Points of view or bear arms, freedom of speech, employment discrimination, and federalism. opinions expressed in Court Review are those of the This completes our two-part review of the 2009-2010 Term; Professor Charles authors and do not necessarily represent the positions of Weisselberg’s review of the criminal decisions was in our last issue. the National Center for State Courts or the American We also have a review of an interesting book by Professor Steven Lubet, a Judges Association. ISSN: 0011-0647. law professor at Northwestern University and a member of Court Review’s Cite as: 46 CT. REV. ___ (2009-2010). Editorial Board. Good, readable books about legal history aren’t plentiful, but Lubet is a master at merging law and history and good stories. Judge Karen Arnold-Burger provides a review of Lubet’s book about the importance of the Fugitive Slave Acts in the years leading up to the Civil War and the role that attorneys and judges played, an interchange that provided an important back- drop for the debate over slavery and the run-up to the Civil War.—SL 114 Court Review - Volume 46 President’s Column Mary Celeste ARE YOU PREPARED FOR YOUR JUDICIAL heads at their election brethren and think, “Boy do we have it ELECTION OR RETENTION ELECTION IN better.” In fact, because retention-election judges have no expe- NOVEMBER 2012? rience running campaigns and have a more difficult chal- The ousting of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices has sent lenger—an elusive issue—some may argue that retention-elec- shockwaves throughout the country for all judges, no matter tion judges actually are in an inferior position to their election- their method of selection and retention. Not only are justices selected counterparts. and judges in election states suddenly vulnerable to judicial The bottom line is well stated by Samuel W. Seymour, opponents with large war chests, even those in retention-elec- President of the New York City Bar Association, as quoted in tion states are now vulnerable on issues that may Professor Schotland’s article: “When a judge suf- bring players backed by large war chests. Iowa, fers an electoral defeat because he or she exer- as a retention-election state, was not alone in cised judicial independence, we all suffer.” The encountering organized efforts to remove jus- judiciary as the third branch of government, the tices from state supreme courts. Alaska Justice branch that is seen as an impartial body that is Dana Fabe squeaked by in her retention election responsible to balance the other two branches of despite anti-abortion/pro-traditional-marriage government, may be in jeopardy of diminished issue opposition; three justices up for retention power if judicial independence is threatened by in Colorado staved off a redistricting-issue oppo- ideologic or partisan politics. Judges and justices sition; two Florida justices tied to an issue on have a duty to protect the judiciary. federal health-care legislation won with the lowest approval Although there are several national organizations that cur- rating ever; in Illinois, Justice Kilbride headed off big money, rently focus on judicial elections, they are restricted to some also over a redistricting decision; and four Kansas

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us