Plant-Microbe Symbioses: a Continuum from Commensalism to Parasitism

Plant-Microbe Symbioses: a Continuum from Commensalism to Parasitism

UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Plant-microbe symbioses: A continuum from commensalism to parasitism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kx779h1 Journal Symbiosis, 37(1-3) ISSN 0334-5114 Author Hirsch, Ann M. Publication Date 2004 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Symbiosis, 37 (2004) xx–xx 1 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot Review article. Plant-Microbe Symbioses: A Continuum from Commensalism to Parasitism ANN M. HIRSCH Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA, Tel. +1-310-206-8673, Fax. +1-310-206-5413, Email. [email protected] Received October 28, 2003; Accepted January 27, 2004 Abstract Photosynthetic organisms establish symbioses with a wide range of microorganisms. This review examines the diversity of symbiotic interactions, and proposes that there is a continuum from commensalism to mutualism to pathogenesis/parasitism in plant-microbe associations. The advantage of considering commensalism, mutualism, and pathogenesis/parasitism as a continuum rather than as discrete relationships between hosts and microbes, as they have been considered in the past, is that it will motivate us to focus more on common molecular mechanisms. Keywords: ?? 1. Introduction Plants establish mutualistic, often described as symbiotic, interactions with myriad organisms, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic. Some of the most prominent photosynthetic mutualisms are illustrated in Fig. 1. Although technically not a plant symbiosis, lichens are photosynthetic and represent an excellent example of a beneficial interaction (Fig. 1A). Presented at the 4th International Symbiosis Congress, August 17–23, 2003, Halifax, Canada 0334-5114/2004/$05.50 ©2004 Balaban 2 A.M. HIRSCH Figure 1. See legend on next page. RUNNING TITLE ?? 3 Lichens are composites of fungi (mostly ascomycetes) and a photosynthetic partner, either cyanobacteria or green algae, or both. Cyanobacteria also associate with the roots of cycads (Fig. 1B) and are found within the leaf of the highly reduced water fern Azolla (Fig. 1C). In the latter symbioses, the cyanobacteria provide nitrogen rather than carbon (see Rai et al., 2000 for a review). In many parts of Asia, Azolla ferns are planted in rice fields as a bio- fertilizer. Cyanobacteria also establish a symbiotic association with one angiosperm, namely Gunnera (Fig. 1D). The symbiosis develops in specialized glands in nonphotosynthetic stem tissues. In addition to these associations, cyanobacteria form symbioses with diatoms, hornworts, liverworts, and the soil fungus Geosiphon pyriforme (Rai et al., 2000). Non-cyanobacterial, nitrogen-fixing bacteria that develop de novo organs on plant roots have been intensively studied because of their ecological and agronomic importance. Fig. 1E illustrates Casuarina trees, the roots of which establish a symbiosis with Frankia, a member of the Actinomycetales. Casuarina nodules are highly modified lateral roots, which develop from the pericycle after some initial cell divisions in the root cortex (Hirsch and LaRue, 1997). In Casuarina, the nodules terminate in ageotropic, stunted roots (insert, Fig. 1E), but in Alnus, a very large cluster of nodule lobes develops. Undoubtedly, the best known of the nitrogen-fixing root symbioses is that between members of the Rhizobiaceae and the majority of members of the plant family Fabaceae. Cell divisions initiating the nodule occur in inner cortical cells for indeterminate nodules such as alfalfa and pea, and in the outer cortex for determinate nodules such as soybean (Hirsch, 1992). Legume root nodules of the indeterminate type are depicted in Fig. 1F. Figure 1. Representatives of the different plant-microbial symbioses described in the text. Unless otherwise noted, all photographs are by the author. (A) Crustose lichen. Insert, transverse section through the thallus of Parmalia sp. The arrow points to one of several round algal cells that serve as the photobiont whereas the lower part of the thallus is composed of fungal hyphae. (B) Habit of Cycas. Insert, transverse section of a part of a large coralloid root of Cycas. The arrow points to the layer of cells that contain the cyanobacteria; the symbiont- containing cells are arranged in a ring when viewed in cross-section. (C) Azolla (arrow) used as a biofertilizer in a rice field in Indonesia. (D) A species of Gunnera growing in New Zealand. (E) Trees of Casuarina. Insert, Casuarina nodules with their ageotropic nodule roots (arrow). Photo, J.G. Torrey. (F) Nitrogen-fixing nodules of Melilotus alba. The asterisk indicates the nodule meristem. Photo, Y. Lin. Insert, longitudinal section through the distal portion of an indeterminate nodule; the asterisk indicates the nodule meristem. (G) Confocal microscope view of a Melilotus alba root colonized by Glomus intraradices. The arrow points to an arbuscule. Insert, enlargement of an arbuscule showing the convoluted surface (arrow). Photos, M.R. Lum. 4 A.M. HIRSCH More extensive discussion of the diversity in legume nodulation can be found in Sprent (2001). Mycorrhizas are examples of a mutualism that occurs between plant roots and fungi; the fungus is involved in phosphate acquisition and the plant supplies carbon. The fungi are taxonomically diverse in the case of ectomycorrhiza, but most are ascomycetes. The arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) association is limited to the Glomales (zygomycetes), which have recently been re-classified as Glomeromycota (Schüssler et al., 2001). Fossilized fungal spores resembling Glomus sp. have been dated from the mid-Ordovician, almost 495 million years ago (Redecker et al., 2000). The development of arbuscules or "little trees" within the root cells distinguishes the AM symbiosis (Fig. 1G). The convoluted membrane that lines the arbuscule increases the area of the interface between host and fungus. A number of significant developmental and genetic similarities have been observed in the legume-rhizobia and AM-fungal mycorrhizal symbioses (see review by Lum and Hirsch, 2003). Examination of these similarities has led to the elucidation of signal transduction pathways in both symbioses (see review by Kistner and Parniske, 2002). Although "symbiosis" in recent times has been used mostly to describe mutualistic associations rather than parasitic ones, there are many similarities in the ways symbionts and pathogens associate with their eukaryotic hosts. The word "symbiosis" was coined by DeBary (1879) to describe "unlike organisms living together", and his original definition included both mutualists and parasites. This initial definition of symbiosis is being re-examined in animal biology, and indeed has been broadened to encompass commensal ("dining at another's table") associations. Hentschel et al. (2000) described a continuum from commensal (one organism benefiting with little or no detriment to the other's fitness) to mutualistic (two organisms benefiting one another) and finally to pathogenic/parasitic (one partner benefits at the expense of the other). Such a continuum can exist even for one organism, e.g., Helicobacter pylori, which can be commensal or pathogenic depending on the host it colonizes (Hooper and Gordon, 2001). This same idea of continuum can be applied to photosynthetic symbioses, but they are rarely discussed in this light. Moreover, symbioses involving plants are often considered in isolation, not only from animal symbioses, but also from each other. [To be comprehensive, I am including lichens in the general category of plant symbioses.] Like animal symbioses, the symbionts may be obligate or facultative, consortial or monospecific; they may be transmitted horizontally (environmentally) or vertically (through the germ line) (McFall-Ngai, 2001). These various modes of organism-to-organism association will be discussed in this review. I will concentrate mostly on the interactions made up of a microbial partner and a eukaryotic host, and where possible, a brief comparison with animal symbioses will be made. In addition, I will discuss the concepts of RUNNING TITLE ?? 5 recognition and specificity, particularly the relevance of each for the establishment and functioning of the symbiosis. The idea of symbiosis as a driving force in development, particularly in reference to its role in eliciting new organ formation in plants, will also be briefly discussed. 2. Consortial versus Monospecific: Many Suitors versus One Symbioses involving plants may involve consortia of associating organisms, including both bacteria and fungi, or may be monospecific as described for animal symbioses, e.g., for the Euprymna scolopes-Vibrio fischeri interaction that results in the formation of a light organ in the squid (McFall-Ngai, 2001). For plants, examples of consortia are the rhizosphere and the phyllosphere whereas the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis is an archetypal example of a monospecific association. There are also instances where the symbioses are tri- or quadripartite, such as lichens, which can be comprised of cyanobacterial and green algal photobionts and a fungus, as well as some nitrogen-fixing root symbioses, which also incorporate mycorrhizal fungi. Moreover, many AM fungi contain their own intracellular inhabitants, bacteria closely related to Burkholderia (see Bonfante, 2003). The rhizosphere The now classic studies of Torsvik et al. (1990) provided the first estimate of more than 4000 culture-independent prokaryotic genomes

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us