Seismic Safety Inventory of California Public Schools**)

Seismic Safety Inventory of California Public Schools**)

SEISMIC SAFETY INVENTORY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (A Report to the Governor of California and the California State Legislature) Prepared by the Department of General Services (November 15, 2002) Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables................................................................................................................................................iv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................v 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Seismic-Safety Surveys and Programs by Other Agencies.................................................1 1.2 History of Legislation and Other Key Factors Affecting the Seismic Design and Construction of Public Schools...........................................................................................2 1.3 DSA Plan Review and Inspection Procedures ....................................................................4 1.4 History of the Changes to the Building Codes Affecting Public School Construction.......4 2. Inventory Methodology ...................................................................................................................6 2.1 An Overview of Construction Records and Files Maintained by the Division of the State Architect.....................................................................................................................7 2.2 The Seismic-Safety Inventory Process................................................................................7 2.3 Building Classification System ...........................................................................................9 2.4 Electronic Database...........................................................................................................10 3. Inventory Results ...........................................................................................................................12 3.1 Building Seismic Vulnerability Categories.......................................................................12 3.2 Summary and Interpretation of Inventory Data ................................................................12 4. Mitigation Strategies ......................................................................................................................17 4.1 An Overview of the FEMA 310 Seismic Evaluation Procedures .....................................17 4.2 Cost Estimates for Seismic Evaluation of School Buildings in the Seismic-Safety Inventory ...........................................................................................................................18 4.3 Cost Estimates for Seismic Rehabilitation of School Buildings in the Seismic-Safety Inventory ...........................................................................................................................20 5. Recommended Implementation Strategies and Policies ................................................................28 5.1 Rehabilitation Priority Ranking Strategies........................................................................28 5.2 Future Actions...................................................................................................................28 5.3 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………………29 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………31 Appendix A: Assembly Bill No. 300 ........................................................................................................A-1 Appendix B: Structural Systems ...............................................................................................................B-1 ii List of Figures Figure 1 Data Collection Form used in California public school seismic-safety inventory .............8 Figure 2 Map of California showing Title 24 seismic zones ..........................................................14 iii List of Tables Table A Number of School Buildings and Total Estimated Costs for Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation for Category 2 Buildings for “Damage Control” Performance Objective .................................................................................................................................. vi Table 1 Building Classification System for Seismic-Safety Inventory of California Public Schools......................................................................................................................... 11 Table 2 Building Types by Seismic Vulnerability Category ............................................................... 12 Table 3 Distribution of Building Types by Seismic Vulnerability Category, Number of Buildings, and Square Footage................................................................................................................. 13 Table 4 Number of Buildings, and Square Footage by Seismic Vulnerability Category and Seismic Zone ................................................................................................... 15 Table 5 Number of Schools Within 2, 5, 10 and More Than 10 Km of an Active Fault, by Seismic Vulnerability Category............................................................................... 16 Table 6 Number of Schools in Areas With Specified Levels of Expected Ground Shaking, by Seismic Vulnerability Category.......................................................................... 16 Table 7 Estimated Seismic Evaluation Costs by Seismic Vulnerability Category .............................. 20 Table 8 Mean Seismic Rehabilitation Costs by Building Type and Seismic Zone ............................. 24 Table 9 Total Seismic Rehabilitation Estimated Costs for Category 2 Buildings in Seismic Zone 3...................................................................................................................................... 25 Table 10 Total Seismic Rehabilitation Estimated Costs for Category 2 Buildings in Seismic Zone 4...................................................................................................................................... 26 Table 11 Total Seismic Rehabilitation Estimated Costs for Category 2 Buildings............................... 26 Table 12 Seismic Rehabilitation Estimated Cost Summary for Category 2 Buildings for the Life- Safety Performance Objective ................................................................................................ 27 Table 13 Seismic Rehabilitation Estimated Cost Summary for Category 2 Buildings for the Damage-Control Performance Objective................................................................................ 27 Table 14 Estimated Costs for Rehabilitation of Category 2 Buildings within 2, 5, 10 and More Than 10 km of an Active Fault for Life-Safety and Damage-Control Performance Objectives................................................................................................................................ 30 iv Executive Summary Public school buildings in California are the Throughout the development of this report, safest in the nation. They exceed the seismic DSA consulted with the Seismic Safety standards required for most other buildings and Commission (SSC). In addition to coordinating have proven to provide a level of protection that the results and recommendations in this report, assures the safety of California’s public school the SSC provided information on other children. Since the passage of the Field Act in inventory reports, the history of seismic safety 1933, no school has collapsed due to a seismic legislation and regulations in California. event, and there has been no loss of life. The resulting inventory of non-wood frame Nonetheless, the need to constantly examine California public schools designed and built conditions, in light of a better understanding of before July 1, 1978, contained 9,659 buildings building performance, is necessary to maintain the high standard that is historic in California. (92 million square feet), which were then This report conforms to the requirements of classified in one of the following seismic Assembly Bill (AB) 300 (Corbett, Chapter 622, vulnerability categories: Statutes of 1999) which requires the California Department of General Services (DGS) to Category 1: those building types that are conduct an inventory of public school buildings likely to perform well, and are (Kindergarten through grade 12, inclusive) that expected (but not guaranteed) to are of concrete tilt-up construction and those achieve life-safety performance with non-wood frame walls that do not meet the in future earthquakes (2,122 minimum requirements of the 1976 Uniform buildings, 27 million square Building Code (UBC). Substantial feet); and improvements in the seismic design of buildings Category 2: those building types that are not were incorporated into the 1976 UBC and were expected to perform as well in adopted for the design and construction of public future earthquakes as Category schools on July 1, 1978. 1 building types and that require The DGS, through the Division of the State detailed seismic evaluation to Architect (DSA), developed a seismic-safety determine if they can be inventory methodology to evaluate the buildings expected to achieve life-safety in a meaningful way without conducting costly performance

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    43 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us