Revolution Or Redux? Assessing IQOS Through a Precursor Product Jesse Elias,1 Lauren M Dutra,1,2 Gideon St

Revolution Or Redux? Assessing IQOS Through a Precursor Product Jesse Elias,1 Lauren M Dutra,1,2 Gideon St

Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054327 on 10 October 2018. Downloaded from Revolution or redux? Assessing IQOS through a precursor product Jesse Elias,1 Lauren M Dutra,1,2 Gideon St. Helen,1,3 Pamela M Ling1,4 1Center for Tobacco Control ABStract IQOS is a safer alternative to smoking cigarettes.6 Research and Educaion, Background Philip Morris International (PMI) currently In an attempt to court favourable regulation, taxa- University of California, San tion and exemptions from smoke-free ordinances Francisco, California, USA claims that its heated tobacco product, IQOS, reduces 2Center for Health Policy health risk by reducing users’ exposure to harmful and for IQOS, PMI has begun promoting the product’s Science and Tobacco Research, potentially harmful constituents present in tobacco purported benefits in meetings with national health RTI International, Berkeley, smoke. Given the tobacco industry’s long history of authorities.7 In December 2016, PMI submitted a California, USA misrepresenting and obfuscating research, independent multi-million page Modified Risk Tobacco Prod- 3UCSF Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical assessment of PMI’s claims is important. Analysis of ucts (MRTP) application to the US Food and Drug 8 Pharmacology, San Francisco, Accord, a failed but strikingly similar precursor to IQOS, Administration (FDA). If approved, PMI will be California, USA may help contextualise PMI’s claims in its Modified Risk able to market IQOS in the USA as a reduced risk 4 UCSF Department of Medicine, Tobacco Product (MRTP) application. alternative to conventional cigarettes. Division of General Internal Given the tobacco industry’s well-docu- Medicine, San Francisco, Methods We analysed previously secret internal Philip California, USA Morris (PM) and PMI documents, public communications mented history of misrepresenting and obfus- and MRTP application. cating its research,2 independent assessment of Correspondence to Results PM marketed Accord as a ’cleaner’ tobacco PMI’s claims is important. While PMI’s internal Dr Pamela M Ling, Department product in an attempt to address smokers’ growing data and business strategy on IQOS are largely of Medicine, University of health concerns without making explicit health claims. unknown, internal Philip Morris (PM) documents California San Francisco School discussing Accord—a failed, but similar heat-not- of Medicine, San Francisco CA While PM communications asserted that Accord reduced 94143, USA; users’ exposure to harmful constituents, company burn precursor to IQOS—are available in public Pamela. Ling@ ucsf. edu scientists and executives consistently stressed to both archives. We compared available documents regulators and the public that such reductions did not detailing product design, exposure data and safety Received 17 February 2018 render Accord safer. IQOS’s design and marketing are claims PM made for Accord to data and claims Revised 6 July 2018 copyright. Accepted 25 August 2018 similar to Accord’s. On the basis of aerosol chemistry submitted as part of the IQOS MRTP application. Published Online First data, IQOS reduces user exposure to some compounds Our aims were to compare product design charac- 10 October 2018 compared with Accord but raises them for others. teristics; determine if IQOS exposure levels were Discussion IQOS appears to be a variant of Accord demonstrably and consistently improved compared without consistent improvements in exposure to aerosol with Accord; and learn how PM understood the toxic compounds. In contrast to PM’s past claims for extent to which reductions in exposure to harmful Accord, PMI now claims in its MRTP application that constituents reduced harm to users. IQOS reduces health risk. This shift in stance is likely http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ not the result of any toxicological difference between METHODS Accord and IQOS, but rather a change in the social and Between October 2013 and January 2016, we regulatory landscape permitting these claims. searched industry documents (available through the Truth Tobacco Industry Document Library; https:// industrydocuments. library. ucsf. edu/ tobacco/) detailing tobacco companies’ development of BACKGROUND various heat-not-burn tobacco product prototypes. The tobacco industry has developed heated tobacco Between January 2017 and May 2018, this dataset products since the 1960s.1 When these ‘safer’ offer- was expanded with additional iterative searches9–11 ings have been marketed, consumers have generally focused specifically on Accord, with initial keyword rejected the products’ poor taste, smell and user searches including "Accord market*,” "Accord on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected experience.2 As of May 2018, however, a heated research," "Accord consumer," "Accord science," tobacco product from Philip Morris International and related terms drawn from earlier searches, such (PMI), IQOS, had won at least moderate consumer as "electrically heated cigarette smoking system" acceptance in several of the 31 countries in which it (EHCSS) and "EHCSS." We then conducted snow- was available.3 By early 2018, IQOS had captured ball searches to locate related documents using nearly 15% of the national tobacco market share reference (Bates) numbers, file locations, dates and in Japan, 2 years after its introduction.4 Despite the individuals mentioned in pertinent documents, and © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use continued predominance of conventional cigarettes by refining subsequent searches with Boolean oper- 3 permitted under CC BY-NC. No to company profit, PMI publicly frames IQOS as ators and year and publication type filters. Iterative commercial re-use. See rights presaging the company’s supposed departure from searches were repeated until keywords and docu- and permissions. Published the cigarette business altogether.5 ments yielded only previously viewed documents, by BMJ. In promoting IQOS, PMI has attempted to foster suggesting saturation. To cite: Elias J, Dutra LM, St. a perception of the product as reduced risk. The To ensure documents’ internal consistency, Helen G, et al. Tob Control company’s public communications and warning all documents were organised thematically and 2018;27:s102–s110. label statements claim that switching completely to chronologically, and relevant documents were s102 Elias J, et al. Tob Control 2018;27:s102–s110. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054327 Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054327 on 10 October 2018. Downloaded from compared with relevant sections of PMI’s MRTP application such products presented a lower health risk to users: because available on the FDA’s website.8 Triangulation with online search tobacco was not combusted, smokers might beexposed to fewer engines, news coverage, public statements made by PMI (most respiratory irritants and carcinogens.1 Marketed as a ‘smokeless’, often found at http://www. pmi. com) and internal PMI docu- ‘cleaner’ cigarette, Premier was widely rejected by consumers ments obtained by Reuters (accessible at https://www.document - and pulled from shelves within 4 months of its release. cloud. org/ public/search/ projectid:_ 2033738) generated data In response to Premier, PM began developing reduced-risk that helped resolve and contextualise questions raised by the tobacco products of its own.2 13 16 A 1990 presentation intro- documents. Having reviewed over 1,000 documents, this anal- duced Project Beta, a battery-operated device that would heat ysis is based on a final collection of 200 documents. rather than burn tobacco.17 Through Project Beta, PM devel- oped the heat-not-burn product, Accord (internally referred to RESULTS as an electrically heated smoking system (EHCSS)).18 Accord Accord origins and specifications comprised a short, low-tar cigarette (in 3 and 6 mg tar versions) Through the late 1980s and early 1990s, public health consensus and a battery-powered lighter into which the user inserted the on the negative health effects and addictiveness of smoking led short cigarette. On the user’s puffing, the tobacco in the ciga- to smoke-free policies and the broader social denormalisation rette would heat, generating a tobacco-flavoured aerosol for of smoking.12 In response to these pressures, RJ Reynolds intro- inhalation. Retailing at US$77 (inflation-adjusted to 2018), duced its ‘clean smoke’ heated tobacco product, Premier, in Accord was packaged for sale as part of a kit that included 1988.13 Although similar to a conventional cigarette, Premier Accord’s special cigarettes (sold at prices comparable to regular heated tobacco, instead of burning (combusting) it, producing an cigarettes), the product’s heating device and an instructional aerosol for inhalation.14 15 Industry scientists hypothesised that video (table 1).16 Table 1 Component comparison: Accord and IQOS Accord IQOS Product description '… [Accord is] an electrically heated cigarette smoking system, comprised 'To operate … the user inserts a Tobacco Stick into the holder and turns on of a lighter/heater, which supplies power to the system, and a cigarette the device by means of a switch. This initiates the heating of the tobacco via designed to be used only with the lighter/heater … activation occurs as the heating blade inserted into the tobacco plug. The tobacco neither ignites the smoker takes a puff. The flow of the puff is detected by a sensor, which nor burns. The electronically controlled heating, in combination with the then

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us