9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms SIGN IN 284 responses Summary Program Organization [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 30 60 90 120 1 Poor 7 2.5% 2 Fair 29 10.5% 3 Good 139 50.4% 4 Excellent 101 36.6% Effectiveness of Speaker Communication [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 40 80 120 160 1 Poor 5 1.8% 2 Fair 27 9.9% 3 Good 168 61.8% 4 Excellent 72 26.5% Quality of Visual Materials [Please rate the https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mx0ZPtzIdkZBSTxKxW­JW8NUjnUl2AKW3jCKK8PtnO4/viewanalytics 1/64 9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 35 70 105 140 1 Poor 6 2.2% 2 Fair 24 8.7% 3 Good 148 53.6% 4 Excellent 98 35.5% Quality of Audience Discussion/Interaction [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 35 70 105 . 1 Poor 12 4.4% 2 Fair 78 28.5% 3 Good 141 51.5% 4 Excellent 43 15.7% Is the length of the meeting: 89.2% https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mx0ZPtzIdkZBSTxKxW­JW8NUjnUl2AKW3jCKK8PtnO4/viewanalytics 2/64 9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms Too Much 17 6.1% Too Little 13 4.7% Just Right 249 89.2% Program Book [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 25 50 75 100 1 Poor 13 5.5% 2 Fair 43 18.2% 3 Good 121 51.3% 4 Excellent 59 25% Abstract Book [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 25 50 75 100 1 Poor 14 6.1% 2 Fair 48 21% 3 Good 112 48.9% 4 Excellent 55 24% Annual Meeting Website [Please rate the following:] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mx0ZPtzIdkZBSTxKxW­JW8NUjnUl2AKW3jCKK8PtnO4/viewanalytics 3/64 9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms 1 Poor 2 Fair 1 3P Goooord 13 4.7% 4 E2x cFelaleinrt 52 18.8% 3 Good 0159 57.43%5 70 105 140 4 Excellent 53 19.1% Mobile App [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 25 50 75 100 1 Poor 26 10% 2 Fair 50 19.2% 3 Good 111 42.5% 4 Excellent 74 28.4% E­Posters [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 25 50 75 100 1 Poor 8 3.4% 2 Fair 39 16.5% 3 Good 121 51.1% 4 Excellent 69 29.1% Poster Presentations [Please rate the following:] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mx0ZPtzIdkZBSTxKxW­JW8NUjnUl2AKW3jCKK8PtnO4/viewanalytics 4/64 9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 35 70 105 140 1 Poor 7 2.5% 2 Fair 36 13% 3 Good 150 54.3% 4 Excellent 83 30.1% Exhibits [Please rate the following:] 1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 0 30 60 90 120 1 Poor 12 4.9% 2 Fair 69 28.2% 3 Good 128 52.2% 4 Excellent 36 14.7% Please share any comments or suggestions for any of the above: Poster presentations remain the highlight of the meeting for me. Please keep on trying to have venues that allow posters to be up for 4 days! most programs were organized by a small group of people, who have been doing them for years. It is important to involve more people from different background. I would have greatly appreciated a hard copy of a functional brain map for my work. Although at least one individual gave me her website for her map, it would be good to have a consensus even if it is a movable approximation. Right now, despite all of the work, I have nothing in hard copy better than Brodmann as a functional copy. Do you have a better one? After all, is that not what the congress is for??? Best wishes Byron Hyde MD https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mx0ZPtzIdkZBSTxKxW­JW8NUjnUl2AKW3jCKK8PtnO4/viewanalytics 5/64 9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms Sometimes the speakers were not loud enough to hear well in the back, so some adjustments in this regards would be appreciated. Wifi is terrible!!! The abstract book contained no abstracts ­ just titles and numbers of the posters. Maybe a good idea to make that more clear from the start (I would not have bought it if I knew). For the education program, I suggest providing all lecture files (some of the files were not included in the sharing website). The wifi needs to work better to be able to utilise the app. Messages to friends were delayed. In the program book different days were not separated clearly. Mobile app too slow, it was always updating. Poster room was too wide and too far from conference room Could not hear any of the speakers in the grand balroom. Temperature in poster presentation room was too cold! That might have been one reason why only few people attended the poster presentations. Some posters were inappropriate for a serious scientific conference (e.g. work about Neymar's soccer abilities, research on people who believe they were abducted by aliens...). The annual meeting website was hard to find ­ it wasn't linked from the main OHBM until quite late in the day, and it didn't come up in google searches ­ quite frustrating! I always enjoy the posters at HBM, but they were rather poorly attended this year. I would have liked to have a program book to carry with me. While the mobile app was great to have, it was useless when my phone ran out of battery. Yes there were charging stations available (which I loved!), but then it also meant I couldn't be listening to lectures while recharging my phone. More variety in keynote lecture topics would have been good ­ it seemed heavily functional and almost no structural or diffusion content. I left empty fields because I didn't use or see the materials. for mobile app: please avoid duplicate abstract numbers (session/posters) make e­ posters searchable need for easier navigation (e.g. a go back button, avoid circles) poster: standby rules should be more respected the app for the blackberry was useless because it did not display poster numbers I could not find links to the program book nor the abstract book from the meeting website! I could only find their links from the OHBM website but it would have made sense to have had links to them from the meeting website. The layout of the meeting website, however, was excellent. If the Oral sessions, Poster sessions, etc. could have had hyperlinks to their abstracts though, it would have saved me a lot of time. While the website was great and I enjoyed in principle the idea of not having paper program books, the internet connection was extremely poor and this was a major https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Mx0ZPtzIdkZBSTxKxW­JW8NUjnUl2AKW3jCKK8PtnO4/viewanalytics 6/64 9/29/2015 OHBM 2015 Overall Evaluation ­ Google Forms drawback during the meeting the program­at­a glance was good, but i feel it could offer a lot more detail, for example, the morning workshops should list all the talks, poster sessions should have topics and poster numbers (ie, imaging methods = 1600­1800) or whatever, keynotes should have to provide bullet points for their talk which could also go in the at­a­glance leaflet. there was a lot of empty space on the sheet, which could be filled with useful info. Oh my god, please pay someone to make a good app. Charge an extra $10 next year for registration if necessary, a good app is essential for finding the stuff you want to see, and the current app is abysmal. Also the posters were not organized into good sections. I found myself having to walk across the room to see posters of similar topics. Because posters are up for 2 days, but speakers only present at poster for 2 hours on one day, can be difficult to get feedback from conference attendees on the poster. For the Abstract Book it could be helpfull to have in addition to the Titel and the Authors as well a short Abstract (max 100 words). if there is no more free program and abstract book in the future then the organisation of the meeting should at least make sure that there is an efficient working free wlan at the conference site so somebody not coming from the us could at least search for the program in the website and check for e­mails the conference fee wasn´t so cheap that there is no program and abstract book included and a free coffee in a coffee break would also be nice not only in the last two days The fact that the WIFI­connection was terrible, really made the conference less enjoyable, as one could, for example, look up papers during talks or work in between sessions. This was a MAJOR drawback. Hi. Great meeting. Ideally the keynotes, etc. would be topics that could apply to everyone (e.g. autism maybe a little too focused). If not, maybe alternative talks at the same time? Poster sessions were poorly attended. This was disheartening as a presenter but also when going to visit Posters. Presenters weren't there during the presentation time (or at other times) and in some cases the posters weren't even up.