Native and Exotic Flower Visitors in the Christchurch Botanic Gardens and Their Contrasting Plant Preferences

Native and Exotic Flower Visitors in the Christchurch Botanic Gardens and Their Contrasting Plant Preferences

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Available online at www.nznaturalsciences.org.nzprovided by UC Research Repository Native and exotic flower visitors in the Christchurch Botanic Gardens and their contrasting plant preferences Christie J. Webber1*, Amanda J. Peterson1, Dave Kelly1, & John Clemens2 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. 2 Christchurch Botanic Gardens, Christchurch City Council, PO Box 73036, Christchurch 8154, New Zealand. *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] (Received 23 February 2012, revised and accepted 21 June 2012) Abstract The Christchurch Botanic Gardens in New Zealand provide a landscape of closely intermixed native and exotic plants. This site was ideal for the study of bird and insect flower visitors and their relative importance for plant regeneration. Thirty-seven species of native and exotic plants were chosen to determine the frequency of bird and insect visitation rates. From these data, plant preferences of native and exotic flower visitors were investigated. A total of 24 insect species from 5 orders were observed. Over 50% of all insect visits were made by the native bee Lasioglossum sordidum. Native insects were found to prefer native plants (70.1% of visits), whereas exotic insects preferred exotic plants (70.4% of visits). Silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) were the main bird flower visitors, and showed no preferences for native vs exotic plants. Exotic birds made up less than 5% of all plant visits, consistent with their relative unimportance to pollination in other New Zealand studies. Key words: Pollination – native – exotic – Coleoptera – Diptera – Hymenoptera – Lepidoptera Introduction 2006; Donovan 2007). New Zealand pollinators include native and exotic The ecosystem service of pollination by bees, flies, moths, butterflies, beetles, animals is important on a global scale, and several bird species (Newstrom & both for biodiversity, and for human Robertson 2005). Bees of the Apoidea welfare as 35% of global crop production superfamily are of particular importance. is dependent on pollinators (Klein et al. New Zealand has 40 species of bee, 27 2007). In New Zealand, insects are the being native and 13 having arrived since main pollinators of commercial crops European settlement (Donovan 2007; and also play an important role in the Donovan & Maynard 2010). Eight pollination of native plants (Kelly et al. species (Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris, New Zealand Natural Sciences (2012) 37: 37-49 © New Zealand Natural Sciences 38 New Zealand Natural Sciences 37 (2012) B. hortorum, B. ruderatus, B. subterraneus, distribution (Kelly et al. 2006). Native Megachile rotundata, Nomia melanderi, birds have also been seen regularly visiting and Osmia coerulescens) were purposely exotic plants (Newstrom & Robertson imported from the Northern Hemisphere 2005). With large declines in bird num- to aid in crop pollination (Donovan bers both worldwide and within New 2007). The honey bee (A. mellifera) is Zealand’s native bird fauna (Şekercioğlu heavily relied upon for pollination of et al. 2004), preferences of native and seed, vegetable, fruit crops and pastures exotic birds towards native plants can be (Howlett & Donovan 2010). With used to give an indication of the extent to the spread of the varroa mite (Varroa which pollination may become limited. destructor) throughout New Zealand Our research aimed to determine the recent research has focussed on the relative importance of native and exotic effectiveness of alternative pollinator taxa, pollinators (both insects and birds) to such as native bee species and flies (Rader native and exotic plants based on the et al. 2009). frequency of visits to flowers. We inves- Recent research on bird-plant mutu- tigated to what extent native and exotic alisms and pollination in New Zealand flower visitors show preferences towards has shown that native birds are more different plant species in the urban set- important pollinators than previously ting of the Christchurch Botanic Gardens thought. Godley (1979) proposed that (CBG) where both native and exotic since many New Zealand flowers are not plants were abundant. We identified in- ornithophilous (i.e. structurally resem- sects to species level where possible in bling typical bird visited flowers), bird order to add knowledge of the species visits were most likely to be incidental and identity of flower visitors in this urban resulting in self-pollination. However, setting. birds are now known to frequently visit small-flowered native species (Kelly et Methods al. 2010), and fruit production of native plants is reduced when birds are excluded Site and plant selection (Anderson 2003). Introduced birds, such as the chaffinch This study was conducted at the (Fringilla coelebs) and house sparrow Christchurch Botanic Gardens (Passer domesticus) made less than 5% of (CBG; 43.53˚S, 172.6˚E) in central flower and fruit visits to native plants in Christchurch, New Zealand. The CBG a recent review (Kelly et al. 2006). Of cover an area of 21 ha and contain large the native birds, there were four species collections of both exotic and native plant which regularly visited flowers: bellbird species (Christchurch Botanic Gardens (Anthornis melanura), tui (Prosthermadera Management Plan, http://wwwlocal.ccc. novaeseelandiae), stitchbird (Notiomystis govt.nz, date accessed 7th Feb 2012). The cincta) and silvereye (Zosterops lateralis). surrounding urban area has numerous Silvereyes were reported to be responsi- gardens containing native and exotic ble for 31% of all flower visits to native plants less than 1 km distant although plants; stitchbirds were important where separated by the open, mown parkland present, but are now very restricted in of Hagley Park; the closest remnant of Webber et al.: Native and exotic flower visitor preferences 39 native forest vegetation is Riccarton level through a combination of sight, Bush 2 km to the west. These plants are photographs and collected specimens. divided between smaller garden areas Species such as Apis mellifera were easily with similar plants grown together: exotic recognised and therefore identified by plants concentrated in the Herbaceous sight. Unknown insects were caught using Border and native plants in the New a sweep net and given a tag number. These Zealand Gardens. An approximately insects were later identified through the equal number of native and exotic plant use of identification keys (Klimaszewski species were chosen for both insect and et al. 1997; Donovan 2007; Thompson bird observations. In order to maximise 2008; Landcare Research http://www. the amount of insect data collected, the landcareresearch.co.nz/research/biocons/ plant species chosen were those which pollination/documents/Insect_Guide. were seen to have frequent insect visitors, pdf accessed 15 Nov 2011) and expert and which gained full exposure to the advice (Brad Howlett pers. comm.). sun at midday. Plant species used for Where possible, photographs of insects bird observations were chosen based on were taken to aid in identification. previous sightings of birds feeding on Pinned samples of the main insects nectar, or species known from previous identified have been retained in the research to attract bird visitors. School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury invertebrate collection. Insect observation Bird observations Observations were carried out once per day in the early afternoon. Although insect Each plant species was watched once per visitors vary temporally, preliminary day for a period of 15 minutes during observations indicated the highest volume the late afternoon. Observations were of insect activity as this time of day. Thus, recorded of any ‘flower visitors’, defined this time of day was used in order to as a bird approaching a flower with or capture as much information as possible without incidental pollination (Kelly from single observations. Observations et al. 2006). The amount of time each were taken under warm and dry weather bird spent at the plant was also recorded, conditions, with a small amount of cloud along with any feeding behaviour. For or wind. Overcast, windy or rainy days this project, silvereyes were classified as where the foraging activity of certain native flower visitors, as their arrival in species could be limited were discounted New Zealand in 1856 occurred without to prevent skewing of the data. An direct human assistance (Heather & instantaneous sampling method was Robertson 1996). It is important to used, where the numbers and identity note that silvereyes have not been in New of all insects in or on the flowers at the Zealand long enough to have affected the time of approach were recorded. To evolution of flower characteristics (Godley remove any potential size bias when 1979), although they are widespread and observing larger plants, a subsection of are now the most common bird visitor approximately 2 m x 2 m was observed to the flowers of native plants (Kelly et (as in Burgess et al. 2006). Insects were al. 2006). identified as close as possible to species 40 New Zealand Natural Sciences 37 (2012) Table 1. Native and exotic plant species used for visitor observations. (a) bird-visited plants Exotic Native Callistemon polendii Knightia excelsa Callistemon citrinus Leptospermum scoparium Callistemon viminalis Weinmannia racemosa Lobelia tupa Phormium cookianum Kniphofia uvaria Sophora microphylla Clianthus maximus

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us