Refraction of 1-Year-Old Children After Cycloplegia with 1% Cyclopentolate 351

Refraction of 1-Year-Old Children After Cycloplegia with 1% Cyclopentolate 351

Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.63.5.348 on 1 May 1979. Downloaded from British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1979, 63, 348-352 Refraction of 1-year-old children after cycloplegia with 1 % cyclopentolate: comparison with findings after atropinisation R. M. INGRAM AND A. BARR From the Kettering and District General Hospital, Kettering SUMMARY Cyclopentolate 1 % is significantly less effective than atropine 1 % at producing cycloplegia in 1-year-old children. If cycloplegic refraction is to be used for investigation or screening children for visual defects during the sensitive period, the more prolonged and profound cycloplegia following atropine could potentially have a disastrous effect on the development of vision. Cyclopentolate 1 % would have to be used, and allowance made for its inadequacy as a cycloplegic. The feasibility study of screening 1-year-old children The findings have been compared with those (Ingram et al., 1979) was followed up and extended refracted after atropine cycloplegia (Ingram, 1979) into adjacent parts of this district using atropine 1 % and with the sample of children reported in the pilot and cyclopentolate 1 % for cycloplegia. Ifretinoscopy study (Ingram et al., 1979). after cycloplegia is to be used for further investi- gation of the possibility of preventing amblyopia Methods and squint, and if it is ever to become a recognised method of screening large numbers of infants for The organisation of the screening was the same as visual defects, the choice of cycloplegic drug might that described for the children refracted after be important. The advantages and disadvantages of atropine cycloplegia (Ingram, 1979). All the http://bjo.bmj.com/ atropine and cyclopentolate, the 2 drugs that are refractions were performed by the same person probably most commonly used, need to be compared, (R. M. I.). particularly with regard to (1) their efficiency as a The refractions of the various groups were then cycloplegic; (2) their side effects and safety; (3) compared to see if (1) The basic spherical refractions whether the mothers had a preference for one or the of one group were more hypermetropic than another. other, because it is no good having an efficient That is, was the mean spherical refraction different test if the cannot screening public be persuaded to when one group was compared with another? (2) on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. use it. The range of the basic spherical refractions of individual eyes or children was different in one Samples of children group to that of another. That is, did the spread of the curve differ between individual groups? (3) The Children born between January 1975 and December incidence of astigmatism and/or anisometropia 1976 and registered on their first birthday with 3 differed. group practices in the town of Rushden were used in this investigation. Those born in 1975 had Results cyclopentolate 1 % instilled once, 30 minutes before retinoscopy. Those born in 1976 had cyclopentolate There is no significant difference between the mean 1 % instilled twice, 40 and 30 minutes before or the spread of the distribution curves for any of retinoscopy. The mothers instilled the cyclopentolate these 3 samples of children when either the basic drops, as it was thought it would be more convenient spherical refraction of individual eyes (Table 2) for them and the clinical staff. or the basic spherical refraction of the more emmetropic eye was recorded (Table 3). Address for reprints: Dr R. M. Ingram, Kettering and There is no significant difference in the incidence District General Hospital, Rothwell Road, Kettering, of any of these refractions between children born in Northaniptonshire NN16 8UZ 1975 and 1976 (Table 4). 348 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.63.5.348 on 1 May 1979. Downloaded from Refraction of 1-year-old children after cycloplegia with I % cyclopentolate 349 Table 1 Particulars of the samples of children screened means of the horizontal meridian are significantly after cyclopentolate 1 % different from the means of the vertical meridian at the 1% level. There is no such difference in the Born 1975 Born 1976 atropine samples. It is not known whether this is Total number available for screening 355 415 due to the cycloplegic drug or to different population Number who 'declined' examination 4 3 samples. There is no significant difference between the means or the spreads of the distribution curves Did not attend 52 83 of any of the atropine 1974, 1975, and 1976 samples Refraction impossible 6 6 in either meridian. The means of both the cyclopen- tolate samples differ significantly at 1 % level Others-squint, congenital from abnormalities, etc. 2 0 the means of each of the atropine samples in both meridia. The spreads of the distribution curves of Number who were refracted 291 (82%) 323 (78%) both cyclopentolate samples differ significantly, at the 5 % level or less, from the spreads of the distri- bution curves of all the atropine samples in both 30 meridia. x - x Cyclogyl x 1 o----o Cyclogyl x 2 Cyclogyl pilot study Table 2 Basic spherical refractions of individual eyes 20 and children Mean SD SE 0 Born 1975 0 59 0-88 0 04 10 Born 1976 0 58 1-05 005 Pilot study 0 64 0-82 003 0 30 n 0 o LO inLO in ui in i LO inLo 0 iN4 0 )In "N - N tr N" * (N Ct- CJ4 r- x. x Cyclogyl x 1 - _ o oq o; _~ -t LhNX-squ o----o Cyclogyl x 2 I I+ in on0 0 o o o -. C' N in8o S o 8 ) 0 o u *Cyclogyl pilot study 000oo __-- N X~ X, - http://bjo.bmj.com/ I + + + + + + + + c 20 Fig. 1 Distribution curves representing the basic VL- spherical refractions of individual eyes examined after cyclopentolate 1 % 0 io1 Comparison of either of the 1975 and 1976 cyclopentolate samples with any one of the 1974, on September 23, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 1975, and 1976 atropine samples shows that the 0 mean of the cyclopentolate samples is significantly in 0 0 in in 0 in in in In in 0 in 0 (NOo pc C-r tC- NC c- C - C N less hypermetropic than that of any of the atropine 0o 0o 0oN N ( i '4 7 + + + + + + + + + in n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 samples. In all cases, when either the basic spherical C'- CN4 in 0 in 0 in 0 in o 00 0 - - " "N r C - '4 refraction of individual eyes or of the more emme- I + + + + + + + + tropic eye of a child is recorded, the difference is Fig. 2 Distribution curve representing the basic significant at the 1 % level. spherical refractions of the more emmetropic eye of Moreover, the incidence of bilateral spherical children examined after cyclopentolate 1 % hypermetropia of +2-00 or more D is significantly higher after cycloplegia with atropine than it is after the use of cyclopentolate (Table 5). Table 3 The means of the cyclopentolate 1975 and 1976 samples are significantly different for the horizontal Mean SD SE meridian at the 5% level but not for the vertical Born 1975 0 55 0-81 0-05 meridian. The spreads of the distribution curves for Born 1976 0 59 0-80 0-04 these samples are not significantly different in either meridian. In both the cyclopentolate samples the Pilot study 0 55 1 00 0 07 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.63.5.348 on 1 May 1979. Downloaded from 350 R. M. Ingram antd A. Barr Table 4 Incidence of spherical hypermetropia, Moreover, there was no means of knowing whether astigmatism, and anisometropia after refraction either cycloplegic was instilled strictly according to following cyclopentolate 1% instructions. A mobile pupil obviously suggests incomplete cycloplegia, but a fixed mydriasis is not Born 1975 Born 1976 necessarily an indication of the amount of cyclo- Number of children with bilateral spherical plegia. Cyclopentolate seems to give variable hypermetropia of + 2 00 or more DS 11 14 mydriasis in young children, and this has been Incidence of bilateral spherical reported especially in premature infants (Carpel and hypermetropia 3-78% 4-33 % Kalina, 1973). On occasions repeated instillations of Number of individual eyes with + 1-50 or cyclopentolate by one of us personally (R. M. I.) more D astigmatism 75 93 has failed to increase mydriasis, and even atropine Incidence of astigmatism + 1-50 or more D does not invariably produce full mydriasis, particu- in individual eyes 12-88% 14-40% larly in coloured races. Number of children who had + 1-50 or more D astigmatism in either or both CYCLOPLEGIA AFTER CYCLOPENTOLATE AND 47 60 eyes ATROPINE Incidence of astigmatism of + 1-50 or Observations on the children refracted after cyclo- more D in either or both eyes 16-15% 18-57% Number of children who had anisometropia 17 17 Table 6 Refractions in the horizontal and vertical Incidence of anisometropia 5-84% 5-26% meridia of individual eyes Incidence of bilateral hypermetropia and/or 27/291 30/323- Horizontal meridian Vertical meridian anisometropia 9-28% 9-28% Sample Incidence of bilateral hypermetropia and/or 57/291 71/323 = Mean SD Mean SD astigmatism 19-59% 21-99% Atropine 1974 +1-21 1-07 +1-16 1-07 Atropine 1975 +1-27 1 11 +1 19 1 11 Table 5 Comparison of the basic spherical refractions Atropine 1976 + 1-28 1-02 +1-23 1-07 after cyclopentolate and atropine cycloplegia Cyclopentolate 1975 +0-96 090 +0-78 091 1974-76 1975-76 Atropine Cyclopentolate Total Cyclopentolate 1976 + 1-06 0-91 +0 82 0 94 http://bjo.bmj.com/ < +2 00 DS in both eyes 1453 589 2042 +2-00 or more DS in both eyes 195 25 220 Table 7 Anisometropia and astigmatism Total 1648 614 2262 Atropine Cyclopentolate P<0-001 1974 1975 1976 1975 1976 < 1.50 D There was a lower incidence of anisometropia astigmatism 17 14 10 6 1 on September 23, 2021 by guest.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us