King’s Research Portal Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Geoghegan, B. D., & Peters, B. (2014). Cybernetics. In L. Emerson, B. Robertson, & R. Marie-Laure (Eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to the Digital Humanities (pp. 109-112). Johns Hopkins University Press. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 Cybernetics Bernard Geoghegan and Benjamin Peters Cybernetics, like many metadi sciplines, evades easy definition: there may ~ow be as many definition s of cybernetics as-or perhap s mor e than-there are self- 1dnie ntified. cY b e rnet1.c 1an. s. Smee. the m1d-. 194os, its. amalgamat10n. of them es of commu- cation and control in computational biological, social, and symbolic systems has inspired :nd bedeviled researchers across the natura l sciences, social sciences, and humaniti es. tro]ccou nt. s h ave various. ly i.d entifi ed cybernetics as a science of commumcat1on. and con- a M(~ iener 1948), a universal science (Bowker 1993),an umbr ella disciplin e (Kline , n.d.), i an,chean sci·e nce (Gali.so n 1994, 232), and a scientific farce founded on sloppy ana lo- g I esM oetwecn comput.e rs and. huma n organisms (Pierce 1961, 208 - 227). his IT mathematician Norbert Wiener is oflen cred ited \.Vithl aun chin g the field with I)Ook C f . W·"' Y7errietics:Or Control and Communi cc,tion in the Ariinwl a11cllri t' MacJu11r (1948). 1 age"n" <:r I)a sc d c Yb e rnet,.rs on hi s World War. II. resea rch ainwd :-it ·bC' tter int· egrat 111· g tiL le cy of hurn·an gu nners and analog computers with in ant1·a 1· rcra ft artill· ery fi re contro I . -h th. adapted wartime resea rch c:>n the feedb..lc.l.: \V" ner an in,-eterare l""'wa - systems. 1e · chi _ . lto >?en<"ralscien«' .:>I.:ommumGtion and ~ h ans and ina nes u ::- C-00.. cesses among um , r m the Greek '"'rd for "steersn1an · (a p~e,_ ....... ·ned the term q'!)<:rn(nw.ITO . - ''--~ trol. He co1 r) to desi!m:ite this new ;.aenee oi 1..-ontrol and ~"--i to the Enolish" term. gowrno. · ks commin!!led- " com pie'.\ nnthenunc1 l anJh--sis. e.nw.""Cl mechanism s. Wieners masterwor .- - . - ..""" . d th t ssociated ,nth :iutomated ma<..huwn . :md >!)e\.'U]a"---- sition on the promise an rea a .. , _ . _ """"' ·1 1· . I d relioiou< nature t" ,ener 1Q-4:S. 19)0 . 1Qt:>4l. The"preh \ 'ntier. of a soc1a po 1t1Ca. an .,. - . ' d. th description of electronic and digital phenomeUJ. finds its oninus now w1desprea Ill e , in Wiener 's speculath-e efforts in C\·bernetics. - The Macy Conferences on Cybernetics (19-46-1951). as the,· ~wre infum1alh · known. staked out a still broader interdisciphnar , pur,iew for CYbernet!C research t Pias ~OQ.j). 110 In addition to Wiener. partiopants included neuroph,siologist \Varren McCulloch . who Cybernetics directed the conferences . the mathematician and game theorist John ,-on Neumann. lead­ ing anthropologists Margaret Mead and Gregon Bateson . engineer Claude Shannon. sociologist-statistician Paul Lazarsfeld . as \\ell as psvch1:11rists. pS'<-choanalvsts. and philos­ ophers . Relying on mathematical and formal definitions of communication . participants rendered permeable the boundaries that d1stmgu1shed humans . machmes . and animals. The language of cybernetic and in format IC analys1s-encod111g . decoding . signal. fe,,d. back. entrap)'. equilibrium. information. communication . control-sustained the analogies between the se ontologicall) distinct classes (Heims 1991). The ·inns1ble college· consti· tuted b)' the Mac)' Conferences prO\·ed immense!) 111fluent1al: von :S:eumann pioneered much of the digital architecture for tl1e computer as \\ ell as Cold \\' ar game theon (Aspra) 1990); Bateson facilitated the adaptation of c,bernetics in anthropolog, · and the Ameri· can counterculture (Turner 20 06); Shann on founded American mformanon theon ~ and Lazarsfeld fashion ed much of the conceptual architecture of postwar communication studies. Although American cybernetics found its roots in military and mdustnal re­ search . England , France , Chile . and the So,·iet Union sen-ed as home to nbrant and dis­ tinct schools of cybernetic research , often with a countercultural or soci.:ilist orienrauon (Pickering 2010; Segal 2003 ; Medina 2011; Gerovitch 2002 ). The methodological hallmarks of cybernetics. especiallv human-machin e inrerac· tion and feedback · overlapped wi· th th e fie Ids o f informati· on' theon · and game theon (Aspray i985) (see GAME THEORY). Mainstream American information theorr. fol]o\\ing Bell Labs. engineer Shannon 's ma th emat1Ca· 1 t h eory of communication. concentrates on the efficient and reliable meas urement an d tran smis sion of data (Shann on 1948) (see fiD ATA).h Von Neumann's. game th eory. m· fluennal . m. eco nomics , developed formal mod e I< - or uman behaV1orbased on stra · d . U th teg1C ecis1on-making processe s (Mirowslo :i.002). A ree methods suggested formal s r . f)eu with h . ystem s ,or des cnbmg communicati\-e acu\'1tles. 0 an emp as1s on promotino t b·1· for d ·b· . 0 s a I ity or efficiency, and sought formal systems escn mg communicative a · · · . - three research field .th . ct1V1t1es. \Viener defended the import ance of grouping the;<' s Wl m cybern f d · roUS distinction amono c b . e ICS, an von Neumann did not deplo)' a ngo o Y ernetics !!ame th . f(1)111 the mid- ho '."' eory , and information theory (Kline 2004) · 19505. wever, man y mformati th . b redto the conflation of these fields Sha on ~nsts and game theorists ha,-e o ,ec Literary and cultu I (_ nnon 1956; Pierce 1973). ra studies have d · ed . '-• ttl• In the late 19 os and • . env a vane!) • of inspirations from cvvcrn 4 19 >os Ame ncan m th . " tht work of Wiener and Sh . a ematic1an Warren Wea,er . ,, ho o,ersa annon dunng the\ . h to 1111· chrne rransla11on and . h .\oar.argued for appl) mg theu re,eJfC _, t e anal)sis of, - I h 19S isua arts (~ ea,er 194 9). Throughout t e 11 stru ctur al lingui st Roman Jakobson advocated the selective adaptation of cy- d 19605 , . I , ' fj d romot c more rigorou s anu sc1en t1 1c cfinition of langu age (Jak b an uc. s to p a • o son berne His f, icnd and colleag ue , th e h ench anthropologi st Claude Levi-Strau ss . con- ,99o). t tru ctui alism was an "indir ec t outcome" of cybernetic s, information theory dcd t 1, a s . ten e theory. and he saw se miolog y as part of the communication scie nces (Geoghe- and gain · · I d' R I d B h io n). French criu cs, me u mg . o.an .art es. a~d Jea n. Baudr.illard , later adapted 311 g f cybernet ic mod el mg w1thm their sem1ot1c studie s whi le arguing that the ele111ents o . ccupat, 011with elimmatmg noi se from commu111cat1ons had a technocratic or fields preo . p0liticallyco nserva tive pred1spos1t1011. (.Barthe s 1974, 1977.; Baudnllard 198,). Jean-Fran,;ois , essay The Postmodern Cond1t1011,ostensibly a critique of the imbrication of infor- Lyotard s . nd economic terms 111 global capita lism, also deployed and adapted a number of mat1ca Ill cybernetic tropes (Lyotard 1984; Galison 1994; Geoghegan 2011). Cybernetics In the ,98o s Donna Haraway and German hterar y critic Friedrich Kittler developed twocontemporaneous but distinct schoo ls of neo -cybernetic criticism. Harawa y adapted the themes of cybernetic analysis to develop a new and ironic style of feminist critique concerned with the artifa ctual, technical , and hybrid conditions of identity in an age of technoscience (Haraway 2004). Subsequent interest in cyborg studie s wove the inter­ twined history of cybernetics and science fiction, from Stanley Kubrick 's Dr. Strangelove to The Terminator,into a refreshing critique of contemporary politics, science , gender , and textuality (Gray 1995; Edwards 1996) (see CYBORGAND POSTHUMAN). Even so , re­ cent historians have noted that only a minor wing of medical cybernetics actually took up the literal fusion of the human and machin e in cyborg research (Kline 2009). In this sense, the legacy of cybernetic human-ma chine int eraction appears to splinter into rich literary specu lation and pragmatic scient ific practice.