What was Elias Hicks teaching in 1824? By Bob Moore My ancestors would share books and 1825 by Joseph and Edward Parker of Bibles, and then pass them down to the Philadelphia. next generation. Although my family has a Within a few years after the book’s long history in the Society of Friends, (see publication, the Religious Society of Canadian Journal of Quaker History 75 (2010), Friends in North America was breaking up 64 - 70), my oldest Quaker book was owned into two groups. One was characterized by by one of my what it perceived to n o n - F r i e n d be Quaker ancestors, orthodoxy, and the G i l l i a m other was Terhune. The characterized by its Terhune family adherence to a set of came to North ideas vocalized by America from Elias Hicks, although the Guilderland those aligned with province of the Hicks’s ideas were Netherlands in not his followers. In the 1660s and 1827, there were two settled in the Yearly Meetings in Pompton Plains Philadelphia, both area of New claiming to be true Jersey where to the cause, but one they probably was attended by the worshipped in Orthodox Friends some form of and the other was the Calvinistic attended by the faith. They had Hicksite Friends. a little Dutch This practice colony there, continued until the and were still re-unification of the speaking Dutch when they migrated to Philadelphia Yearly Meeting in 1955. Norfolk County, Ontario in the 1830s. One would have to study all of Hicks’s Eventually they joined the Methodist letters and sermons to get a life-long, Church. While still living in Pompton comprehensive overview of his theology Plains, they were given a collection of but for this article we can only ask: what sixteen of the discourses that Elias Hicks potentially controversial ideas was the had delivered throughout 1824. Every time seventy-six-year old Elias Hicks teaching in Hicks gave a discourse, his words were 1824? A summary of themes found in his taken in short hand by M.T.C. Gould, and own words as recorded by Gould will tell this 322-page collection was published in us. What was Elias Hicks teaching in 1824? The Bible movement. For some Friends, Jesus is Hicks looked at the Orthodox Saviour and Lord, for others he is Teacher movement with its attachment to Scripture and Lord, and for some he is the Teacher. and saw its short comings and concluded For Hicks, He was neither Saviour nor that Scripture is insufficient for living like Lord, but he was “our gracious Christ (226).1 Fox had a high regard for pattern” (106), “our blessed pattern,” (116) Scripture but would have agreed with Hicks and “our great pattern” (141). that “hearing the word does not have any effect; we must turn inward to the light of Salvation God in the soul” (131). Fox taught that the Fox wrote in his journal, “I saw that Bible was inspired by the Holy Spirit, and Christ died for all men, and was a was a guide to life and practice but Hicks propitiation for all, and enlightened all men seemed to demote the Bible somewhat in and women with His divine and saving his statements such as it is “nothing but a light; and that none could be a true believer history of passing events which occurred but who believed in it.”3 1800 years ago” (315). Ironically, Hicks did For Hicks, salvation comes from exhort his hearers to “search the looking inside to find the divine seed of scriptures” (17, 314) and then he used light that is within each one of us and then Scripture to argue that we should not give allowing that seed of light to grow in the Bible too much authority. He opposed dominance over our thoughts and decisions the tendency in some Christian and, by and actions (75, 81,141): “We cannot be osmosis, some Quaker circles to revere the Christians till, like our high priest and Bible so that it became an idol, and the example, we have overcome all worshipper was guilty of bibliolatry (6). temptations” (265). “The Almighty cannot unite with us and speak with us face to face Christ till we are brought off from all these sins Fox held to the traditional belief that which are in direct opposition to his holy Jesus was the son of God, and part of the nature” (58, 59). Redemption results from Trinity. He wrote in his journal that he told coming “home to the light within”(75), Dr. Cradock of Coventry that “Mary was which is “the only savior and deliverer of [Jesus’] mother and that he was supposed to men” (77). be the son of Joseph, but he was the Son of Another topic of theological debate has God."2 Hicks did believe in the virgin birth been the pre-destination, or election, of (69, 250) but opposed the Incarnation; he some for condemnation and some for taught that Jesus is not the Light, but that salvation. On this topic, Hicks was close to the light which was in him is available to all Fox and opposed Calvinistic definition of as “a portion of his own spirit” (67). election (24, 25) and stated that “those who Hicks went even further to oppose the elect him are his elect” (117); in this debate, divinity of Jesus: “We can see that this flesh Hicks was closer to those who promote free and blood never could have been in a strict will (36) like the Wesleyan Methodists. sense, the son of God … spirit and matter Some branches of Quakerism found cannot be united together, and make a sympathy in the Unitarian Universalist being, or make a son of God” (251). movement. For example, Lucretia Coffin Still today, one finds different positions Mott, the Quaker abolitionist and feminist within different branches of the Quaker taught from Unitarian pulpits. Perhaps, Canadian Quaker History Journal 76 (2011)16 34 What was Elias Hicks teaching in 1824? Canadian Quaker History Journal 76 (2011)16 35 What was Elias Hicks teaching in 1824? Hicks laid the seeds for this sympathy when through his Divine Light. he taught that “to every nation [God] deals in his own way, according to his own Satan kindness, and the proportion of their Hicks opposed the concept of Satan as faithfulness, come to be united to him, and a being (37); rather, Hicks considered Satan to know salvation as completely as any to be the tempting disposition within us, others” (119, 120). which is the man of sin, self, and self-will in man (163, 166). Similarly, fallen angels are View of Humanity people who have fallen away from the life The human is made up of Divine Light, of faith (182), apostate men and women a rational soul and an animal body. The (293). However, a person known as the Divine Light reveals secrets to the rational antichrist seem to have some support, and soul. We carry out our actions in the outer Hicks described the antichrist as world through the animal body. The transforming himself into an angel of light rational soul must balance with (207). understanding the promptings of the inner light and the animal body. (205) Hicks Religious practices warns that “as free agents, we can reason A meeting for worship presents the ourselves into a belief that wrong is same experience that the apostles had after right” (208). He also warns against “carnal Christ’s ascension, that is “to sit down in a reasoning (209), counterfeit wisdom” (210) state of nothingness and self-abasement and “counterfeit belief ” (215). In this and not to stir nor to do anything, to teaching, Hicks seemed to parallel the proclaim him, or bear witness of his name, Platonic view that informed Christianity at till the Holy Ghost should descend upon the time, and probably Orthodox friends by them” (109). association, i.e. that a person is a soul which This state of waiting should also inform has a body. each Friend’s practice of reflection at the end of each day to address our “balance View of the World sheet” of right and wrong (44, 45). Hicks taught that God’s hand is in all things: “therefore as everything upon the Social Criticism earth is the work of his holy hand, still his Hicks was quite outspoken on a number power continues in it; and although he of social issues. On a number of these made a power in the tree to produce others issues, he felt that some of the influential of the same kind, yet, was his power to be Orthodox Friends were blending in with withdrawn from them they would sink into the world around them. Hicks used their annihilation, or every effect must rest upon conformity on these specific issues as its cause, or it cannot stand” (251). Even justification for his challenges to Orthodox though he taught the immanent teachings in general. Like many Friends, participation of the Creator in the creation, Hicks opposed slavery but he took the Hicks believed that the study of the created protest one step further and also opposed world cannot point us toward God, or teach the use of goods which were manufactured us the morality required by God (54, 55). through the use of slave labour. For We are totally dependent on God, and only example, Hicks urged the use of “fair he is capable of teaching us what is right trade” cotton, or some alternative cloth like Canadian Quaker History Journal 76 (2011)16 36 What was Elias Hicks teaching in 1824? wool or linen.