Leptasterias)

Leptasterias)

Mar Biol (2008) 154:593–602 DOI 10.1007/s00227-008-0952-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Pleistocene speciation of sister taxa in a North PaciWc clade of brooding sea stars (Leptasterias) D. W. Foltz · A. T. Nguyen · J. R. Kiger · C. L. Mah Received: 14 December 2007 / Accepted: 28 February 2008 / Published online: 18 March 2008 © Springer-Verlag 2008 Abstract Although numerous coastal marine species PaciWc brooding subgenus of sea stars (Leptasterias subge- show intra-speciWc lineage splitting and population diver- nus Hexasterias). Calibration is obtained from a trans-arctic gence times that date to the period of glacial cycles during migration in a related clade of sea stars (Leptasterias sub- the Pleistocene epoch, reported instances of recent specia- genera Hexasterias and Nesasterias) that is timed to the tion in the coastal marine environment are relatively rare. opening of the Bering Strait at 3.5 § 0.25 Mya, and uncer- Marine organisms with brood-protection and other repro- tainty in the calibration point is accommodated with a ductive modes with limited dispersal potential have been normally-distributed Bayesian prior probability. Similar suggested to experience more frequent speciation and estimates of population splitting times for two of the pairs extinction events than related species with higher dispersal of putative sister taxa were obtained by a multilocus coales- rates, but few studies have actually estimated divergence cent analysis. Estimates of mitochondrial mutation rates times of sister species in these organisms. Here, two mito- (0.01/My) were approximately 50% of the values calibrated chondrial gene regions (cytochrome oxidase subunit I, for sister species pairs in tropical sea stars and sea urchins. putative control region and upstream tRNAs) and a nuclear gene region (Elongation factor 1 subunit intron 4) provide evidence of recent (0.5–1.2 Mya) cladogenetic events in Introduction four pairs of putative sister taxa in a predominantly North Cycles of glacial advance and retreat from the late Pliocene to the Pleistocene epoch (which began 1.8 Mya) were associated with major changes in the coastal marine Communicated by T. Reusch. environment, including variation in sea surface and air Electronic supplementary material The online version of this temperatures and changes in sea level and coastal hydrogra- article (doi:10.1007/s00227-008-0952-9) contains supplementary phy. Along the California coastline, periods of glacial material, which is available to authorized users. advance were also associated with altered patterns of near- shore upwelling, as well as wetter climatic conditions near D. W. Foltz (&) · A. T. Nguyen V Department of Biological Sciences, the coastline that led to increased runo through exposed Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA coastal canyons (see discussion and references in Dawson e-mail: [email protected] 2001; Jacobs et al. 2004; Hickerson and Cunningham 2005). These glacial cycles had important eVects on the J. R. Kiger Molecular Genetics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, genetic structure of terrestrial and freshwater animal and Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA plant species (e.g., Avise et al. 1998; Bernatchez and Wil- son 1998; Hewitt 2004), probably due to cycles of range C. L. Mah contraction and expansion coupled in some instances with Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, MRC-163, range fragmentation into disjunct refugia. In agreement P.O. Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, with temporal patterns commonly seen in non-marine ver- Washington, DC 20007, USA tebrate species, several marine species along the PaciWc 123 594 Mar Biol (2008) 154:593–602 coast of North America show Pleistocene-dated divergence report (Hrincevich et al. 2000) of recent lineage splitting of conspeciWc populations (e.g., Marko 2004; Wares and events (0.04–2.3 Mya) in the genus Leptasterias involved Cunningham 2005; Hickerson and Cunningham 2005). both intra- and inter-speciWc divergences, due to limited However, there are few examples for coastal marine ani- taxonomic information. This earlier study also had other mals in North America of divergence times of putative sis- potential limitations, including a rate calibration from tropi- ter taxa that have been dated to the Pleistocene epoch, in cal sea stars and no nuclear sequence data. Here, nuclear contrast to terrestrial animals, for which numerous exam- and mitochondrial sequence data, calibrated from a trans- ples of Pleistocene-dated speciation have been reported arctic comparison of species in Leptasterias subgenera Lep- (e.g., Knowles 2000; Lovette 2005). For example, only one tasterias and Nesasterias, are used to produce Bayesian of 14 molecular phylogenetic studies of marine animals estimates of divergence times for four putative sister along the PaciWc coast of North America that were species pairs in Leptasterias subgenus Hexasterias, all of reviewed by Jacobs et al. (2004) reported interspeciWc which are documented as having a brood-protecting mode divergence times younger than 1.8 million years (My). of reproduction. The estimated times of speciation (range Such diVerences between terrestrial and marine systems 0.50–1.22 Mya) fall within the Pleistocene epoch, as does could reXect diVerences in the geographic extent and con- the bulk of the 95% highest probability density interval. nectivity of populations in the two environments (Dawson and Hamner 2008), or could reXect the fact that taxonomic delineation of marine species lags behind that of terrestrial Materials and methods species, causing some recent speciation events in marine animals to be unrecognized (Marko et al. 2003). A third DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing possibility is that prior surveys have under-sampled marine species with brooded larvae and other non-dispersive DNA was extracted from fresh, frozen or alcohol-preserved modes of reproduction. The survey by Jacobs et al. (2004) sea star tube feet as in Foltz (2007) and from formalin-pre- did include several North PaciWc molluscan genera that served tissues as in Foltz et al. (2007a). PCR reactions for lack planktonic larvae, including one genus (Nucella) for mitochondrial sequences were set up using a scaled down which molecular and morphological evidence for Pleisto- version of the protocol in Hrincevich and Foltz (1996); cene speciation was recently reported by Marko et al. details of primers and reaction conditions for nuclear (2003), suggesting that a broader survey of divergence sequences have been published elsewhere (Foltz et al. dates in marine invertebrates with brood protection and 2007b) or are in Electronic Supplementary Table S2. Cycle other non-dispersive modes of reproduction might yield sequencing was performed as in Foltz et al. (2007a, b). additional evidence for recent speciation events. Examples Intra-individual nucleotide site heterozygosity and length of Pleistocene-dated speciation are known for some tropical variation heterozygosity for nuclear sequences were and subtropical echinoderms that reproduce by pelagic resolved as in Foltz (2007). planktrotrophic larvae, including the sea urchins Diadema (Lessios et al. 2001), Echinometra (McCartney et al. 2000) Taxon and gene selection and Eucidaris (Lessios et al. 1999) and the sea cucumber Holothuria (Uthicke et al. 2005). For phylogenetic reconstruction, data were obtained from The present report concerns Leptasterias, a species-rich 35 specimens of Leptasterias representing 13 nominal spe- (45 described species) genus of sea stars in the family Aste- cies or cryptic species (Bickford et al. 2006). The taxo- riidae, order Forcipulatida that is distributed throughout the nomic status of the morphologically identiWed and/or northern hemisphere in cold to temperate, predominantly genetically identiWed cryptic species of Leptasterias shallow-water environments. Members of the genus Lep- included in the analysis is discussed below. Four other for- tasterias are obligate lecithotrophic brooders (McEdward cipulate species (Evasterias retifera, Urasterias lincki, and Miner 2001), in which females retain fertilized eggs Stephanasterias albula and a composite of Pisaster ochrac- and larvae on the benthic surface, until the oVspring meta- eus and P. brevispinus) were included as outgroups in the morphose into a crawl-away juvenile form. Among Leptas- phylogenetic reconstruction (Electronic Supplementary terias, the documented evolutionary consequences of Table S4). Evasterias was included in the analysis because brooding (compared to related taxa with pelagic larvae) prior studies (Knott and Wray 2000; Foltz et al. 2007a) sug- include a reduction in gene Xow among local populations, gested that this genus is the sister group to Leptasterias. an increase in the importance of genetic drift (measured as The remaining outgroups were chosen more opportunisti- FST), a reduction in the amount of nucleotide diversity and cally, based on the ability of PCR primers to amplify the an increase in the rate of non-synonymous substitution in target regions and on the general rooting strategy of protein-coding genes (Foltz et al. 1996a, 2004). An earlier Smith (1994). Although the Evasterias + Leptasterias clade 123 Mar Biol (2008) 154:593–602 595 is well supported (e.g., 100% bootstrap support from Foltz tion on the divergence time of a North Atlantic (Leptaste- et al. 2007a), the sister group to this clade is currently rias muelleri) and two North PaciWc (L. Wsheri and L. unknown. The phylogenetic reconstruction was based

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us