Ice-Dynamic Conditions of Shirase Glacier, Antarctica, Inferred from ERS SAR Interferometry

Ice-Dynamic Conditions of Shirase Glacier, Antarctica, Inferred from ERS SAR Interferometry

Journal of Glaciology, Vo l. 48, No.163, 2002 Ice-dynamic conditions of Shirase Glacier, Antarctica, inferred from ERS SAR interferometry Frank PATTYN,1 Dominique DERAUW2 1Geografisch Instituut,Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium E-mail: [email protected] 2Centre Spatial de Lie© ge (CSL),Universite¨ de Lie© ge, Avenue du Pre¨ -Aily, B-4031 Angleur,Belgium ABSTRACT. The surface velocity field of Shirase Glacier, a fast-flowing East Antarctic outlet glacier, is determined from ERS synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images by means of speckle tracking using phase correlation, a technique which matches small image kernels of two complex SAR images by maximization of the local coherence. Velocity estimates are used to calculate surface strain rates, which are then used to calculate the large-scale, verti- cally integrated force balance and to determine the major stress components resisting the driving stress. For the whole glacier system, the driving stress is largely balanced by the basal drag, but with contributions fromlateral drag up to 15% of the driving stress at the grounding line. Longitudinal stress gradients have only local importance to the balance of forces, limited to an area of a few square kilometers near the grounding line, where they resist the driving stress. In the grounded part of the glacier, 490% of the total ice velocity is due to basal sliding. Comparison with a balance-flux distribution of the Antarctic ice sheet suggests that the glacier in the downstreampart of the Shirase drainage basin is close to equilibrium, showing a slight negative imbalance. INTRODUCTION 68' S 500 The East Antarctic ice sheet (EAIS) is primarily drained by large outlet glaciers, which play a decisive role in the dynamic behaviour of the ice sheet. Shirase Glacier is such a glacier, Syowa (Japan) 1000 situated along the coast of east Dronning Maud Land (Fig. 69' S ^1 1500 1). Characterized by a surface velocity of up to 2700 ma at Lützhow-Holm Bay 500 the calving front, Shirase Glacier is one of the fastest outlet 2000 glaciers draining the EAIS. Its mass output is estimated to 500 be 12.5 Gt a^1 at the calving front (Fujii,1981). It lies in a nar- row trough 510kmin width, and which reaches depths of 70' S 41500 mnear the present calving front (Moriwaki and 1000 Yoshida,1983). In the grounded area, ice flow is strongly con- Shirase Glacier 1000 vergent, with 90% of the ice fromthe Shirase drainage basin 1500 being drained by Shirase Glacier (Fujii,1981). Shirase Glacier 71' S 40'E does not calve directly into sea but ends in a 40 kmlong float- 35'E 45'E ing ice tongue, which is confined by the surrounding slow- km moving ice sheet and a few nunataks. 0 100 200 Not much is known on the dynamics of Shirase Glacier, as Fig. 1. Mapof Lu « tzow^Holm Bay, Dronning Maud Land, difficult access hampers fieldwork activities in the down- East Antarctica.The small rectangle corresponds to the Shirase streamarea of the drainage basin.The only adjacent area that Glacier study area as depicted in Figures 2^4. has been thoroughly investigated is situated near Mizuho Plateau, roughly 200 kmupstreamof the grounding line. Field Mizuho Plateau, the calving front of Shirase Glacier has been measurements there revealed that the ice sheet in this area is the subject of a number of investigations, mainly through thinning at a rate of 0.5^1.0 ma ^1 (Mae and Naruse, 1978; analysis of aerial photographs (Nakawo and others,1978; Fujii, Nishio and others,1989; Toh and Shibuya,1992).This thinning 1981). is believed to be the result of increasing basal sliding over time The position of the calving-front area of Shirase Glacier (Mae, 1979). An analysis of European Remote-sensing Satel- is depicted in Figure 2. In this area the floating ice tongue lite (ERS) altimeter data for the period 1992^96 (Wingham disintegrates into a conglomerate of several large icebergs, and others,1998) suggests a rather moderate thinning in Shir- which are clearly visible in this satellite image. These ice- ase drainage basin. Large data gaps in the downstreamarea, bergs stick together in the fast ice that covers the entrance which are due to tape-recorder limitations, prevented a more of Lu« tzow^HolmBay, forminga continuation of the tongue. accurate assessment of the imbalance in this region. Besides At regular intervals (few to tens of years), these icebergs are 559 Journal of Glaciology This paper presents insight into the present-day dynam- 55 ics of Shirase Glacier, based on a satellite-derived surface velocity field of the area near the grounding line. Surface displacements are determined from ERS synthetic aperture 50 radar (SAR) imagery by speckle tracking using phase cor- relation. A large-scale force budget is then applied to esti- 45 mate the major forces balancing the driving stress. Finally, CF the present dynamical state of Shirase Glacier is estimated by analyzing its mass budget. 40 INTERFEROMETRIC PROCESSING 35 Interferometric processing of SAR imagery allows for deter- 30 mination of the surface displacement field with a centi- meter-level precision. Two co-registered SAR images are used to generate an interferogram, which is a plot of phase FT 25 shifts as a function of position. The phase in the resulting Y distance (km) interferogramcan be divided into two parts. The first part, B 20 the interferometric phase, contains relative optical-path variations over the time interval between the two image GL acquisitions. The second part, the coherence term, contains 15 phase differences due to changes in the response of illumin- ated scatterers. Optical-path variations have different ori- gins: (i) an orbital phase depending on the viewing geometry 10 of the SAR image pair, (ii) a topographic phase due to the relief of the imaged area, and (iii) a differential phase caused by 5 A local displacements of the ground surface in consecutively scanned images. Of interest here is the differential phase Á'd, a measure of the displacement of a ground surface 0 point in the look direction of the spacecraft, within the 0 5 10 15 20 25 time-span between the acquisition of the two images, i.e. X distance (km) Á'd 4=Áz,where 5.6 cmis the wavelength of Fig.2. Amplitude image of the ERS-1scene of Shirase Glacier the ERS radar and Áz is the look-direction component of acquired on 2 June1996. Ice flow is primarilyfrom thebottom the optical-path variation. Half a wavelength of displace- of the image towards the top. The x axis corresponds to the ment in the look direction produces a phase shift of 360³. If the displacement has a component in the direction of the satellite look direction (slant range),while the y axis corres- 1 ponds to the direction of satellite's motion (azimuth). CF, satellite's motion , it has no influence on the differential calving front; FT, floating tongue; GL, grounding line; A, phase. The altitude of ambiguity is a measure for the sensi- Shirase Glacier main stream; B, secondary stream. tivity of an interferometric pair to topography, which depends on the perpendicular baseline, wavelength and cleared fromthe area as the fast ice breaks up in Lu« tzow^ radar look angle. The altitude of ambiguity is typically of HolmBay. This repeated change is also visible froman the order of 100 mfor most interferometric applications analysis of 1963 U.S. Department of Defense declassified using ERS sensors. Sensitivity to displacement (or to any intelligence satellite photography (DISP), Landsat data other local optical-path variation) depends on the wave- and RADARSAT-1 image mosaics (Kim and others, 2001). length of the radar. In 1962 this iceberg conglomerate was at its furthest extent. Retrieval of ERS SAR images from Antarctica is diffi- It then retreated about 60 kmin the mid-1970s to a position cult. Because of the satellite orbital configuration, only the that nearly matched its position in 2000. Between 1997 and area north of 78³ S can be imaged. Moreover, only a fraction 2000 a retreat of about 12kmwas observed (personal com- of the potential imagery may be retrieved, depending on op- munication from K. C. Jezek, 2001). It should be stressed, erating procedures and proximity to receiving stations. For however, that such retreat is not a retreat of the grounding the purpose of this study, only three suitable ERS-1/-2 tan- line of the glacier, nor of its calving front, but a removal of dempairs 2 were acquired at Syowa station, Antarctica. icebergs that have already calved off. Among these three pairs, the pair of 2 and 3 June 1996 has a favorable altitude of ambiguity with respect to differential interferometry (i.e. near-zero baseline). The resulting inter- ferogramis nearly insensitive to topography. For this pair of SAR images, however, glacier movement is primarily per- 1 pendicular to the satellite look direction, to which differential The orbit track defines the azimuth axis; the line of sight interferometry is not sensitive. Horizontal ice displacement defines the range axis of SAR images. was therefore obtained by means of speckle tracking using 2 During the tandemphase of the ERS-1 and -2 satellites, phase correlation (Derauw,1999).This method uses the max- both satellites were placed in the same orbit to ensure a imum interferometric coherence to match small image ker- 1day repeat coverage. nels (windows) fromtwo co-registered SAR images of the 560 Pattyn and Derauw: Ice-dynamic conditions of Shirase Glacier range offsets and geometric corrections for azimuth offsets were not applied. Errors in velocities obtained by speckle tracking using phase correlation are determined from the non-moving parts in the scene.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us