Rediscovery of Mantellias Pubicornis Westwood, 1889, a Rare Praying Mantis from the Amazon (Mantodea, Thespidae, Oligonicinae)

Rediscovery of Mantellias Pubicornis Westwood, 1889, a Rare Praying Mantis from the Amazon (Mantodea, Thespidae, Oligonicinae)

Zootaxa 3973 (1): 195–199 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3973.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D46485A6-EE90-427D-A370-68FD5726DF55 Rediscovery of Mantellias pubicornis Westwood, 1889, a rare praying mantis from the Amazon (Mantodea, Thespidae, Oligonicinae) CAROLINE MALDANER1, ANTONIO A. AGUDELO & JOSÉ ALBERTINO RAFAEL Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA) 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Many praying mantis species remain known from type specimens only. The majority of these taxa have vague taxonomic limits, as original descriptions are often very short, making strong emphasis on superficial characters (Rivera 2010). One clear example of this is the Amazonian Mantellias Westwood, 1889, a monotypical genus represented by Mantellias pubicornis Westwood, 1889. Westwood (1889) described M. pubicornis presumably on the basis of specimens obtained in Brazil (Pará and Amazonas States). Westwood’s original description emphasized male characters, briefly mentioned the alleged female, and included a few measurements of both sexes. The exact number of individuals in the type series was not indicated. He classified Mantellias within the “Miomantides”, along with Miopteryx Saussure, 1869 and Mantillica Westwood, 1889. No type was designated. Since its original description, M. pubicornis has been cited only in catalogs, checklists and identification keys. Nevertheless, its systematic placement remains largely undefined, as all historical attempts to classify Mantellias were done on the basis of Westwood’s vague description. The result is a confusing systematic scenario. Kirby (1904) classified Mantellias within the Mantinae, whereas Giglio-Tos (1919, 1927) placed it within the Pseudomiopteryginae, along other Neotropical genera such as Diabantia Giglio-Tos, 1915, Mantillica, Pseudomiopteryx Saussure, 1870, Anamiopteryx Giglio-Tos, 1915, Bantiella Giglio-Tos, 1915 and Miobantia Giglio-Tos, 1917. Later on, Beier (1935) subdivided Thespinae into five tribes: Thespini, Oligonicini, Parathespini, Hoplocoryphini and Pseudomiopterygini, placing Mantellias within the latter. Beier’s (1935) concept of Pseudomiopterygini also included Pseudomiopteryginae sensu Giglio-Tos (1919, 1927) in addition to Eumiopteryx Giglio-Tos, 1915, Antimiopteryx Giglio- Tos, 1915, Promiopteryx Giglio-Tos, 1915 and Chloromiopteryx Giglio-Tos, 1915. Beier maintained this same classification in later contributions (Beier 1964, 1968). More recently, Terra (1995) assigned Mantellias to Thespidae but considered it as incertae sedis within the family. Ehrmann (2002) assigned Mantellias to the Oligonicinae, specifically within the Pogonogasterini of Beier (1964), along with Pogonogaster Rehn, 1918, Carrikerella Hebard, 1922, Liguanea Rehn & Hebard, 1938, Thesprotia Stål, 1877, Mantillica and Pseudopogonogaster Beier, 1942. Agudelo et al. (2007), Ehrmann & Koçak (2009) and Rivera (2010) followed this latest arrangement. After examining the type series of M. pubicornis, deposited at the Oxford University Museum of Natural History (OUNHM), we are now in the position to assess its taxonomic status and systematic placement. We also take the opportunity to redefine this taxon and provide additional information on the type material. Taxonomy Mantellias Westwood, 1889 Type species: Mantellias pubicornis Westwood, 1889 (monotypy) Westwood 1889:38 (Miomantides); Kirby 1904: 225 (Mantinae); Giglio-Tos 1919: 62 (Pseudomiopteryginae, Pseudomiopteriges); Giglio-Tos 1927: 257 (Pseudomiopteryginae, Pseudomiopteriges); Beier 1935: 5; 1964: 944; 1968: 8 (Thespinae, Pseudomioterygini); Terra 1995: 51 (Thespidae, insertae sedis); Cerdá 1996: 6 (Pseudomioterygini); Ehrmann 2002: 213, 375 (Oligonicinae, Pogonogasterini); Agudelo et al. 2007: 110, 118 (Thespidae, Oligonicinae, Pogonogasterini); Ehrmann & Koçak, 2009: 16 (Thespidae, Oligonicinae, Pogonogasterini); Rivera 2010: 53 (Thespidae, Oligonicinae). Accepted by J. Rivera: 22 Apr. 2015; published: 16 Jun. 2015 195.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us