Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 A 2500 deg2 CMB LENSING MAP FROM COMBINED SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE AND PLANCK DATA Y. Omori1, R. Chown1, G. Simard1, K. T. Story2,3,4,5, K. Aylor6, E. J. Baxter7,8,2 B. A. Benson9,2,8, L. E. Bleem10,2, J. E. Carlstrom2,3,10,8,11, C. L. Chang10,2,8, H-M. Cho12, T. M. Crawford2,8, A. T. Crites2,8,13, T. de Haan1,14, M. A. Dobbs1,18, W. B. Everett15, E. M. George14,16, N. W. Halverson15,17, N. L. Harrington14, G. P. Holder1,18,19,20, Z. Hou2,8, W. L. Holzapfel14, J. D. Hrubes21, L. Knox6, A. T. Lee14,22, E. M. Leitch2,8, D. Luong-Van21, A. Manzotti2,8, D. P. Marrone23, J. J. McMahon24, S. S. Meyer2,8,11,3, L. M. Mocanu2,8, J. J. Mohr25,26,27, T. Natoli2,3,28, S. Padin2,8, C. Pryke29, C. L. Reichardt14,30, J. E. Ruhl31, J. T. Sayre31,15, K. K. Schaffer2,11,32, E. Shirokoff14,2,8, Z. Staniszewski31,33, A. A. Stark34, K. Vanderlinde28,35, J. D. Vieira19,20, R. Williamson2,8, and O. Zahn36 ABSTRACT We present a cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing map produced from a linear combination of South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck temperature data. The 150 GHz temperature data from the 2500 deg2 SPT-SZ survey is combined with the Planck 143 GHz data in harmonic space, to obtain a temperature map that has a broader ` coverage and less noise than either individual map. Using a quadratic estimator technique on this combined temperature map, we produce a map of the gravitational lensing potential projected along the line of sight. We measure the auto-spectrum φφ of the lensing potential CL , and compare it to the theoretical prediction for a ΛCDM cosmology +0:06 +0:01 consistent with the Planck 2015 data set, finding a best-fit amplitude of 0:95−0:06(Stat:)−0:01(Sys:). The null hypothesis of no lensing is rejected at a significance of 24 σ. One important use of such a lensing potential map is in cross-correlations with other dark matter tracers. We demonstrate φG this cross-correlation in practice by calculating the cross-spectrum, CL , between the SPT+Planck φG lensing map and Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) galaxies. We fit CL to a power law −b −8 φG +0:04 of the form pL = a(L=L0) with a = 2:15 10 , b = 1:35, L0 = 490, and find η = 0:94−0:04, × φG +0:02 which is marginally lower, but in good agreement with η = 1:00−0:01, the best-fit amplitude for the cross-correlation of Planck-2015 CMB lensing and WISE galaxies over 67% of the sky. The lensing potential map presented here will be used for cross-correlation studies∼ with the Dark Energy Survey (DES), whose footprint nearly completely covers the SPT 2500 deg2 field. Subject headings: Gravitational lensing : general | 1 Department of Physics and McGill Space Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T8, Canada Straße 2, 85748 Garching, Germany 2 Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of 17 Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 CO, 80309 3 Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 18 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, CIFAR Pro- USA 60637 gram in Cosmology and Gravity, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z8, 4 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Canada Stanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 19 Astronomy Department, University of Illinois at Urbana- 5 Dept. of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Champaign, 1002 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Stanford, CA 94305 20 Department of Physics, University of Illinois Urbana- 6 Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA, Champaign, 1110 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA USA 95616 21 University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 7 Center for Particle Cosmology, Department of Physics and 22 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Berkeley, CA, USA 94720 23 arXiv:1705.00743v1 [astro-ph.CO] 2 May 2017 19104 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North 8 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721 Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 60637 24 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 9 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, MS209, P.O. Box MI, USA 48109 500, Batavia, IL 60510 25 Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨at,81679 10 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Labora- M¨unchen, Germany tory, Argonne, IL, USA 60439 26 Excellence Cluster Universe, 85748 Garching, Germany 11 Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 27 Max-Planck-Institut f¨urextraterrestrische Physik, 85748 USA 60637 Garching, Germany 12 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill 28 Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 of Toronto, 50 St George St, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H4, Canada 13 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 29 Department of Physics, University of Minnesota, Min- 91125 neapolis, MN, USA 55455 14 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, 30 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC CA, USA 94720 3010, Australia 15 Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, Department 31 Physics Department, Center for Education and Research of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, in Cosmology and Astrophysics, Case Western Reserve Univer- Boulder, CO, 80309 sity,Cleveland, OH, USA 44106 16 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild- 32 Liberal Arts Department, School of the Art Institute of 2 SPT Collaboration 2016 1. INTRODUCTION CMB has some key advantages over cosmic shear and Mapping the distribution of matter in the Universe is other lensing probes, in that the CMB is a single well- one of the primary goals of modern cosmology. In the localized source at a precisely known redshift, and the currently favored cosmological paradigm, quantum fluc- underlying statistics of the CMB are well characterized tuations in the extremely early Universe were stretched and known to be very close to Gaussian. These charac- to macroscopic wavelengths during the epoch of infla- teristics make reconstructing maps of the mass or grav- tion and subsequently grew under the influence of grav- itational potential responsible for CMB lensing a com- ity, eventually creating all the structure we observe in paratively straightforward process. the Universe today. Observations of the distribution of CMB lensing encodes the effect of all matter fluctu- matter in the local and distant Universe can thus in- ations along the line of sight between the observer and the CMB last-scattering surface at z 1100, though the form our understanding of the origin of fluctuations and ∼ how they grew as a function of time. The fluctuation CMB is most efficiently lensed by matter at 0:5 . z . 3 amplitude at redshift z 1000 (roughly 400,000 years (e.g., Zaldarriaga & Seljak 1999). This wide and well- after inflation) is already∼ well constrained by measure- estimated redshift kernel makes CMB lensing an ideal ments of the primary CMB temperature and polariza- probe to investigate phenomena such as massive neutri- tion anisotropy power spectra (e.g Planck Collaboration nos that affect the shape of the matter power spectrum. et al. 2015d). Measurements of structure from z 1000 Although there is no information about the redshift to today primarily constrain the efficiency with∼ which dependence of growth inherent to CMB lensing maps, fluctuations have grown as a function of wavelength and correlating CMB lensing maps with other tracers of redshift, i.e., the cosmic growth function (e.g. Huterer large-scale structure that do have redshift information| et al. 2015). Among the most interesting and impor- optical galaxy surveys in particular|can provide inter- tant applications of measuring the growth function are esting constraints on dark energy and modified gravity measuring the masses of the neutrinos by detecting their (e.g., Giannantonio et al. 2016; Kirk et al. 2016). influence on growth as a function of physical wavelength The ideal CMB lensing map for cross-correlation stud- (e.g. Abazajian et al. 2015), and distinguishing between ies would thus have high signal-to-noise (S/N) on all dark energy and modified gravity as the cause of cosmic angular modes of interest, large sky coverage, and sig- acceleration (e.g. Weinberg et al. 2013; Huterer et al. nificant overlap with galaxy surveys. The highest total 2015). S/N of any measurement of CMB lensing comes from the Traditionally, measurements of cosmic structure have lensing map produced by the Planck collaboration, which used light (or its absence) as a proxy for matter. Galaxy covers nearly the full sky but with low S/N per mode, and and quasar surveys, measurements of the Lyman-α for- only at scales below tens of degrees. Data from ground- est, and optical, X-ray, and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect based telescopes such as the South Pole Telescope (SPT), surveys for clusters of galaxies all fundamentally rely on the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), and POLAR- radiation emitted, absorbed, or distorted by collapsed BEAR have been used to produce lensing maps with objects as a tracer of the underlying matter field. Anal- improved S/N on smaller scales over much smaller sky yses of the statistics of these tracers assume a relation fractions (Das et al. 2011; van Engelen et al. 2012; PO- between the observed property of the collapsed objects LARBEAR Collaboration et al. 2013; Story et al. 2015; and the mass of those objects, and between the statistics Sherwin et al. 2016). of the collapsed objects and those of the underlying mat- In this work, we present a CMB lensing map over 2500 ter field.