Gender Quota and State Feminism in South Korea and Taiwan Chang-Ling Huang Department of Political Science National Taiwan University Gender Quota

Gender Quota and State Feminism in South Korea and Taiwan Chang-Ling Huang Department of Political Science National Taiwan University Gender Quota

Fighting for the Seats: Gender Quota and State Feminism in South Korea and Taiwan Chang-Ling Huang Department of Political Science National Taiwan University Gender Quota • Major Institutional Design to Increase Women’s Representation, Electoral as well as Non-Electoral • Electoral Representation: Widely Adopted, over 90 Countries (Constitution, Election Laws, Party Rules) • Non-Electoral Representation: Less Discussed, but no Less Important (Norway) State Feminism • When Feminists Enter the State, Femocrats • International Trend/Post-Cold War Politics • The 4th World Conference on Women ( Beijing 1995) • Gender Mainstreaming/Policy Tools • Target 30% Argument • gender quota literatures focus on electoral representation, but non-electoral representation is also, if not more, important. • In comparison to South Korea, Taiwan performs better in electoral representation, but worse in non-electoral representation. • The reason: different institutional environment for the development of State Feminism Gender Quota and Electoral Representation • Global Trend • Electoral system matters: PR most compatible, Single-member district, least compatible • South Korea and Taiwan: mixed system, single-member district plus party list Global Trend: Women in National Parliaments 60 50 40 % 30 20 10 0 12345678910 Rank 2002 2007 Rank Country Women % Country Women % 1 Sweden 45.3 Rwanda 48.8 2 Denmark 38 Sweden 47.3 3 Finland 37.5 Finland 42 4 Norway 36.4 Costa Rica 38.6 5 Costa Rica 35.1 Norway 37.9 6 Iceland 34.9 Denmark 36.9 7 Netherland 34 Netherland 36.7 8 Argentina 30.7 Cuba/Spain 36 9 Mozambique 30 Argentina 35 10 South Africa 29.8 Mozambique 34.8 35 30 Fem 25 al e M 20 % P s 15 i n S 10 o u t h 5 K o r 0 e a an 1948 d T 1954 a i w 1960 an 1967 1971 1973 1978 1981 Ye Ko a r r 1985 ea Ta iw 1988 an 1992 1996 2000 2004 9% 8% 7% F e 6% ma 5% le Me 4% mb 3% e rs 2% in L 1% o c a 0% l A s s e 1950 mb 1 953 lie 1956 s 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 Tai 1980 w a n 1983 S. Ko 1986 re a 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 Female County Magistrates 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 Year Taiwan S.Korea Femal City Council Members : Seoul and Taipei 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 9 3 9 5 1 5 1 6 71 75 77 81 83 8 87 89 9 93 97 99 0 03 05 97 97 99 19 19 1 19 19 1 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 1 19 19 20 20 20 Year Taipei Seoul Taiwan has more female representatives because……… • Pre-existed institutions. Reserved Seats for Women since the 1947 constitution. The quota remains 10% for years and became ceilings. • Major momentum appeared in the mid- 1990s. Demanded by feminist organizations. Target 25% • Party adoption. Quota is gender neutral. Less resistance from male politicians. Quota Type South Korea Taiwan National 50% 50% Legislature (9.35% of total seats) (15% of total seats) (Party List) National 30% Nomination 0 Legislature encouraged. No Penalty. Financial (District) Incenctives) Local Assembly 50% SNTV: (Party List) For every four elected, one must be a woman. Local Assembly 30% Nomination (15%-25%) encouraged. No Penalty. Financial (District) Incenctives) Female Parliamentary Members (Political Family) 70 62.5 60 51.5 50 41.1 40 % 30 30 20 10.3 10 3.4 0 Total District Party List Korea Taiwan Democracy and Non-electoral Representation • The Changing State-Society Relations in South Korea and Taiwan • Mutually embedded and mutually constituting • Proliferation of Government Committees and Public Commissions • The institutional barriers of elections Women in Government Committees 40 35 30 25 % 20 15 10 5 0 Total Central Government Local Government South Korea Taiwan State Feminism in South Korea and Taiwan • South Korea: 2001 Ministry of Gender Equality • Taiwan: 1997 Cabinet level Commission on the Promotion of Women’s Rights • Femocrats Led vs. Commissions Led Gender Quota in Education Taiwan Commission on Gender Equality Education, Ministry of Eduation Gender Equality Education Law 30% Gender Quota in Teachers Review Committee (gender neutral, all levels) Gender Quota in Education South Korea A Femocrat in Ministry of Education 200 out of 1000 new faculty positions Controversies and criticism Tentative Conclusion • Gender and democracy • The goal of quota: implementing the quota to make quota eventually meaningless • more attention should be paid to non- electoral representation, whether from the research agenda of democratization or state feminism.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us