1 TEORIA I METODOLOGIA: Ackerman, B. (2000). the New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113(3), 634–729

1 TEORIA I METODOLOGIA: Ackerman, B. (2000). the New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113(3), 634–729

TEORIA I METODOLOGIA: Ackerman, B. (2000). The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113(3), 634–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342286 Allen, B., O’Loughlin, P., Jasperson, A., & Sullivan, J. L. (1994). The Media and the Gulf War: Framing, Priming, and the Spiral of Silence, Polity, 27(2), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235175 Antoszewski, A. (2008). Tworzenie i utrzymanie koalicji gabinetowych. In A. Antoszewski & R. Herbut (Eds.), Demokracje zachodnioeuropejskie. Analiza porównawcza (2nd ed., pp. 344–369). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Austen-Smith, D. (1987). Interest Groups, Campaign Contributions, and Probabilistic Voting. Public Choice, 54(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00123002 Back, H., Debus, M., & Dumont, P (2011). Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50(4), 441–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01980.x Bäcker, R. et al. (2016). Metodologia badań politologicznych. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Nauk Politycznych. Banaś, M., & Zieliński, M. (2015). Formowanie koalicji gabinetowych w perspektywie sieciowej. Studium przypadku sojuszu PO– PSL z 2007 roku. Wrocław: Atla 2. Barabasi, A-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks Science of Networks. New York: Basic Books. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260–1288. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991857 Belanger, E. (2004). Antypartyism and Third-Party Vote Choice. A Comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia. Comparative Political Studies, 37(9), 10541078. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0010414004268847 Belanger, E. (2004). Antypartyism and Third-Party Vote Choice. A Comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia. Comparative Political Studies, 37(9), 10541078. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0010414004268847 Bergman, T. (1993a). Constitutional Design and Government Formation: The Expected Consequences of Negative Parliamentarism. Scandinavian Political Studies, 16(4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9477.1993.tb00042.x Bergman, T. (1993b). Formation Rules and Minority Governments. European Journal of Political Research, 23(1), 55–66. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1993.tb00348.x Beyme von, K. (1985). Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: San Martin Press. Blockmans, T., & Guerry, M.-A. (2016). Coalition Formation Procedures: The Impact of Issue Saliences and Consensus Estimation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(3), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015- 9449-3 Blondel, J. (1968). Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 180–203. https://doi:10.1017/S0008423900036507 Bogdanor, V. (2011). The Coalition and the Constitution. London: Palgrave. Bolleyer, N., Ibenskas, R., & Keith, D. (2016). The Survival and Termination of Party Mergers in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12143 Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Borgatti, S., P., Everett, M., G., & Johnson, J. G. (2017). Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage Publications. Bowler, S., Brauninger, T., Debus, M., & Indridason, I. H. (2016). Let’s Just Agree to Disagree: Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Coalition Agreements. The Journal of Politics, 78(4), 1264–1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/686805 Brams, S. J. (2003). Game Theory and Politics. Mineola, NY: Dover Publicatons. Bright, D., Whelan, Ch., & Harris-Hogan, Sh. (2018). On the Durability of Terrorist Networks: Revealing the Hidden Connections between Jihadist Cells. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1494411. Browne, E. C. (1971). Testing Theories of Coalition Formation in the European Context. Comparative Political Studies, 1 3(4), 391–412. https://doi. org/10.1177/001041407100300401 Carrington, P. (2014). Social Network Research. In S. Dominguez & B. Hollstein (Eds.), Mixed Methods Social Network Research. Design and Application (pp. 35–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277–292. Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cherepnalkoski, D., Karpf, A., Mozetic, I., & Grcar, M. (2016). Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0166586. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0166586 Christiansen, F. J., & Helboe Pedersen, H. (2014). Minority Coalition Governance in Denmark. Party Politics, 20(6), 940–949. https://doi. org/10.1177/1354068812462924 Copus, C. (2004). Party Politics and Local Government. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Cotta, M. (1996). Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship. Coalitions, Alliances, Fusions and Splits during the Transition and Posttransition Stages. In G. Pridham & P. G. Lewis (Eds.), Stabilising Fragile Democracies. Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe (pp. 69–99). London: Routledge. Cronin, B. (2015). Getting Started in Social Network Analysis with NETDRAW. University of Greenwich Business School. Occasional Paper 01/15. Retrieved from https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/16200/7/16200%20CRONIN_Getting_ Started_in%20SNA_with_NETDRAW_2015.pdf Dańda, A. (2013). Ewolucja pozycji ustrojowej generalnego gubernatora w dominiach brytyjskich. In A. Zięba (Ed.), Konstytucjonalizm w państwach anglosaskich (pp. 103–122). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. D’Angelo, P., & Esser, F. (2014). Metacoverage and Mediatization in US Presidential Elections. Journalism Practice, 8(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10. 1080/17512786.2014.889446 Daschmann, G. (2000). Vox pop & polls: The impact of poll results and voter statements in the media on the perception of a climate of opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 160–181. https://doi. org/10.1093/ijpor/12.2.160 de Lange, S. L. (2012). New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties. Political Studies, 60(4), 899–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00947.x De Swaan, A. (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations. Amsterdam: Elsevier. De Winter, L., & Dumont, P. (2006). Parties into Government: Still Many Puzzles. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 175–188). London – Thousands Oaks – New Delhi: Sage Publications. Debus, M. (2007). Pre-Electoral Alliances, Coalition Rejections, and Multiparty Governments. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845203898 Debus, M. (2009). Analysing Party Politics in Germany with New Approaches for Estimating Policy Preferences of Political Actors. German Politics, 18(3), 281–300, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000903055773 Debus, M. (2009). Pre-Electoral Commitments and Government Formation. Public Choice, 138(1–2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9338-2 Debus, M. (2011). Portfolio allocation and policy compromises: How and why the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats formed a coalition government. The Political Quarterly, 82(2), 293–304. Diermeier, D., & Van Roozendaal, P. (1998). The Duration of Cabinet Formation Processes in Western Multi-party Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 609–626. Dobek-Ostrowska, B. (2004). Media masowe i aktorzy polityczni w świetle studiów nad komunikowaniem politycznym. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Dodd, L. (1976). Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Dowding, K. (1995). Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies, 43(1), 136–158. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01705.x Dowding, K. (2013). Power in Prime-Ministerial Performance: Institutional and Personal Factors. In P. Strangio, P. t’Hart & J. Walter (Eds.), Understanding Prime Ministerial Performance (pp. 57–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2 Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135– 150. Druckman, J. N., & Thies, M. F. (2002). The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088432 Dumont, P., De Winter, L., & Andeweg, R. B. (2011). From coalition theory to coalition puzzles. In R. B. Andeweg, L. De Winter, P. Dumont (Eds.), Puzzles of Government Formation. Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases (pp. 1–23). London – New York: Routledge. Dunleavy, P., & Diwakar, R. (2013). Analysing Multiparty Competition in Plurality Rule Elections. Party Politics, 19(6), pp. 855–886. https://doi. org/10.1177/1354068811411026 Durac, V. (2015). Social movements, protest movements and cross-ideological coalitions – the Arab uprisings re- appraised. Democratization, 22(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1010809 Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., & Lazer, D. (2009). Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106(36), 15274–15278. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900282106

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    25 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us