Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1998 FORM: The ORF TRAN Object Recovery Model. A Methodology to Extract Object-Oriented Designs From Imperative Code. Bonnie Lynn Achee Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Achee, Bonnie Lynn, "FORM: The ORF TRAN Object Recovery Model. A Methodology to Extract Object-Oriented Designs From Imperative Code." (1998). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6614. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6614 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. FORM: THE FORTRAN OBJECT RECOVERY MODEL - A METHODOLOGY TO EXTRACT OBJECT-ORIENTED DESIGNS FROM IMPERATIVE CODE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University an Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment o f the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Computer Science by Bonnie Lynn Achee B.S. Southeastern Louisiana University, 1990 May 1998 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 9824471 UMI Microform 9824471 Copyright 1998, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. in memory of my parents, ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Acknowledgements I would like to begin by thanking God for His presence in my life. Throughout the course of my studies at LSU, I have experienced some of the most joyous and most devastating moments of my personal life. He has walked beside me to guide me and carried me through the times when I felt I could not go on. I am truly grateful for His unconditional love and its manifestation in the many friends I have made during my graduate career. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to Dr. Doris L. Carver who has been my professor, advisor and friend. She has influenced my graduate career from beginning to end. It is through counseling with her that I applied for a Board of Regents Fellowship at LSU and entered the program. It was her instruction in software engineering and programming languages that sparked my excitement in the area of reverse engineering. It was her guidance that helped me to develop a research topic, and her motivation and sympathetic ear that has helped me to complete it. My appreciation is also extended to my doctoral advisory committee: Drs. Chari, Iyengar, Jones, Kraft, and Oxley, for taking the time to review my dissertation. My husband, Eric Stegen, has been a great source of strength. He has been my source of security throughout my studies. His patience, understanding and encouragement have been a great motivation to me. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Finally, I would like to thank my parents. Although they are not here to share this milestone in my life, without them nothing would have been possible. It is their unconditional love and confidence that made me even dare to dream that I could achieve such a goal. Although my father never saw me enter graduate school, it was through his expectations and belief in me. The gratitude that I have for my mother, her role in my graduate studies, her encouragement and her sacrifice could never be adequately expressed in words. Throughout my life she has been the wind beneath my wings. iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................Hi List of Figures......................................................................................................... vii Abstract.......................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... I 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Outline of the Dissertation ......................................................................6 Chapter 2. Related Research ............................................................................... 7 2.1 Code Restructuring .............................................................................. 8 2.2 Program Understanding ..................................................................... 9 2.3 Structure Identification ....................................................................... 12 2.4 Design and Specification Recovery ................................................... 13 2.5 System Migration ................................................................................ 18 2.6 Relevance to the Dissertation .................................................................19 Chapter 3. FORM: The FORTRAN Object Recovery Methodology 21 3.1 Pre-Processing.........................................................................................21 3.1.1 The Aliasing Problem - Actual Parameters..................... 24 3.1.2 Determining Placeholder Variables .................................. 25 3.1.3 Resolving the Aliases ........................................................ 27 3.1.3.1 The Brute Force Method ..................................... 28 3.1.3.2 The Computational Method ................................ 28 3.2 Obj ect Extraction ................................................................................ 34 3.2.1 Attribute Extraction - Actual Parameter Analysis 36 3.2.2 Attribute Extraction - Global Variable Analysis .............. 40 3.2.3 Method Extraction .............................................................. 45 3.3 Class Abstraction .................................................................................... 49 3.3.1 Attribute Definition ................................................................51 3.3.2 Method Definition ................................................................. 52 3.4 Abstraction of the Inheritance Hierarchy ............................................. 54 3.4.1 Attribute-Based Similarity .................................................. 55 3.4.2 Method-Based Similarity .................................................... 57 3.4.3 Combining Threshold Tables ............................................. 59 3.5 Representation of the Object Model .......................................................60 3.5.1 The Hierarchy Diagrams..................................................... 61 3.5.2 The Interaction Diagrams ....................................................62 3.6 Validation and Evaluation of FORM ....................................................64 V Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3.6.1 Traditional View of Software Quality .................................66 3.6.2 Software Quality - Reverse Engineering Perspective 69 3.7 Summary and Concluding Remarks................................................ 72 Chapter 4. Case Studies ..................................................................................... 74 4.1 Statistics