PHY202 – Quantum Mechanics Summary of Topic 4: the Finite Potential Well

PHY202 – Quantum Mechanics Summary of Topic 4: the Finite Potential Well

PHY202 { Quantum Mechanics Summary of Topic 4: The Finite Potential Well The quantum well In a sandwich of two semiconductors, e.g. AlGaAs-GaAs, in the conduction zone one can have an effective potential well. When V0 is very large, we have the limit of the infinite potential well. Otherwise we have a finite potential well. The Finite Potential Well A particle in the potential 8 L V0 x < − 2 < L L V (x) = 0 − 2 ≤ x ≤ 2 : L V0 x > 2 When E > V0: unbound states, total energy E is continuous (not quantized). When E < V0 { bound states. Find them by solving the TISE: • −L=2 < x < L=2 (Region I): 00 2 2 2mE (x) = −k (x), where k = 2 > 0. A general solution is I (x) = A sin kx + B cos kx ~ (A; B { arbitrary constants). • x > L=2 (Region II): 00 2 2 2m(V0−E) −αx αx (x) = α (x), where α = 2 > 0. A general solution is II (x) = Ce + De ~ (C; D { arbitrary constants). Must put D = 0, otherwise (x) not square integrable (blows up at large +ve x). L • x < − 2 (Region III): −αx αx like in region II. A general solution is III (x) = F e + Ge Must put F = 0, otherwise (x) not square integrable (blows up at large -ve x). Note in regions II and III, total E = PE + KE = V0 + KE, but E < V0 hence KE < 0! The potential is symmetric w.r.t. to x = 0 ) expect symmetric (even-parity) and antisym- metric (odd-parity) states Even parity solutions Consider even-parity solutions only: I (x) = B cos kx. Apply general conditions on at x = L=2: • continuous at x = L=2: ) I (L=2) = II (L=2) ) B cos (kL=2) = C exp (−αL=2) 0 0 0 • continuous at x = L=2: ) I (L=2) = II (L=2) ) −Bk sin (kL=2) = −Cα exp (−αL=2) kL α • divide side-by-side: ) The quantisation condition reads tan 2 = k . kL k0L • introduce θ = 2 ) LHS: y(θ) = tan θ. Introduce and θ0 = 2 { const., where q 2 q q 2 2 2mV0 α k0 V0−E θ0 k = 2 > 0, ) RHS: y(θ) = = 2 − 1 = = 2 − 1 0 ~ k k E θ q 2 q 2 α θ0 1 α θ0 • when E V0 ) k = θ2 − 1 / θ . When E % V0 ) θ % θ0 ) k = θ2 − 1 & 0. Odd-parity solutions Consider odd-parity solutions only: I (x) = B sin kx, proceed as before. ) The quantisation kL α condition reads cot 2 = − k . Comments: • The even-parity solutions are determined when the curve y = tan θ intersects the curve α y = k . The odd-parity solutions are determined when the curve y = cot θ intersects the 2 2 α ~ k curve y = − k . The intersection points determine k and hence E = 2m . • larger V0 ) more bound states; smaller V0 ) less bound states • there is always at least one (symmetric) bound state, even in a very shallow well (V0 & 0). • the wavenumber and energy of the nth state is less than in the IPW for which the wavenum- nπ nπ bers kn = L , or θn = 2 , n = 1; 3; 5; ::: for symmetric states, n = 2; 4; 6; ::: for antisym- metric states. 2 2 π π ~ • when θ0 < 2 , V0 < 2mL2 ) no antisymmetric states exist A comparison of the FPW and the IPW Infinite well: Finite well: (x) confined to the well (x) spreads out beyond the well nπ kn = L kn and energies lower infinite tower of states finite tower of states no unbound states unbound states when E > V0 The energy levels in the FPW are lower because the wavefunction spreads out (by penetrating the classically forbidden region) and therefore reduces its KE. Quantum Tunnelling At x > L=2 the wavefunction (x) / e−αx; at x < −L=2 (x) / eαx. When V0 % 1 ) α % 1 ) 1/α & 0, when E % V0 ) α & 0 ) 1/α % 1. • The depth of tunnelling is determined by α { the penetration depth . • Non-zero wavefunction in classically forbidden regions (KE < 0!) is a purely quantum mechanical effect. It allows tunnelling between classically allowed regions. • It follows from requiring that both (x) and 0(x) are continuous! ) Requiring a \reasonable behaviour" of the wavefunction leads to a (classically) \crazy" phenomenon of tunnelling. Quantum states in potential wells Some general properties: • quantum (discrete) energy states are a typical property of any well-type potential • the corresponding wavefunctions (and probability) are mostly confined inside the potential but exhibit non-zero \tails" in the classically forbidden regions of KE < 0 (except when V (x) ! 1 where the tails are not allowed). • both properties result from requiring the wavefunction (x) and its derivative 0(x) to be continuous everywhere (except when V (x) ! 1 where 0(x) is not continuous). • quantum states in symmetric potentials (w.r.t. reflections x ! −x) are either symmetric (i.e., even parity), with an even number of nodes, or else antisymmetric (i.e, odd parity), with an odd number of nodes • the lowest energy state (ground state) is always above the bottom of the potential and is symmetric (A consequence of the HUP.) • the wider and/or more shallow the potential, the lower the energies of the quantum states (A consequence of the HUP.) • inside FPW-type of potentials the number of quantum states is finite • when the total energy E is larger than the height of the potential, the energy becomes continuous, i.e., we have continuous states • when V = V (x), both bound and continuous states are stationary, i.e, the time-dependent wavefunctions are of the form Ψ(x; t) = (x) exp − i Et ~ Further reading: See, e.g., Phillips, Ch. 5.1..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us