Cuticle Evolution in Early Cretaceous Angiosperms from the Potomac Group of Virginia and Maryland1

Cuticle Evolution in Early Cretaceous Angiosperms from the Potomac Group of Virginia and Maryland1

CUTICLE EVOLUTION IN EARLY CRETACEOUS ANGIOSPERMS FROM THE POTOMAC GROUP OF VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND1 Studies of angiosperm leaf cuticles from the Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group reinforce previous evidence for a Cretaceous adaptive radiation of the flowering plants and suggest unsuspected trends in the evolution of stomata and trichomes. Early Potomac Group angiosperm leaf cuticles (Zone I of Brenner or Aptian?) show little interspecific structural diversity, particularly in stomatal organization. All species conform to the same highly plastic pattern of variation in subsidiary cell arrangement, in which the stomata on a single leaf conform to several types, including paracytic, hemiparacytic, anomocytic, laterocytic, and weakly cyclocytic. Several species resemble extant Chloranthaceae and Illiciales, but none represents a modem family. Later leaves (Subzone 11-B of Brenner, or Albian) exhibit greater interspecific structural diversity, particularly in stomatal organization. Three new pat- terns of variation in subsidiary cell arrangement are present in addition to the older one and each has a subset of the variation present in the older pattern. Cuticular anatomy is consistent with proposed leaf affinities to Platanaceae and Rosidae. The stratigraphictrend in cuticle types supports the concept that the subclass Magnoliidae includes the most primitive living angiosperms. However, it also suggests that the uniformly paracytic stomatal pattern characteristic of Magnoliales, generally considered prim- itive for the flowering plants, may actually be derived from the variable condition found in Zone I leaves. Within the past 15 years there has been a major was a period of major angiosperm diversification reevaluation of the Cretaceous flowering plant and that paleobotanical studies should continue record and the role of fossils in angiosperm phy- to yield new evidence on the course and timing logeny. Formerly, it was thought that fossils could of flowering plant evolution. provide little evidence on the course of angio- One largely untouched source of data is cuticu- sperm evolution, since even the earliest known lar anatomy. Despite the fact that cuticles have remains were believed to represent modem fam- long provided important characters for the sys- ilies and genera (Axelrod, 1952, 1970). This view, tematic placement of Mesozoic gymnosperms and based on older studies of leaf remains such as Tertiary angiosperm leaves (e.g., Harris, 1932, those by Fontaine (1 889), Ward (1905), and Ber- 1964; mausel& Weyland, 1950, 1954; Dilcher, ry (1 9 1 1) for the Potomac Group, has been 1974), most work on Cretaceous flowering plant strongly contradicted by more recent analyses of leaves has neglected cuticular anatomy and relied Cretaceous pollen and leaf architecture (Doyle, solely on leaf architecture (e.g., venation, shape). 1969; Muller, 1970, 1981; Wolfe et al., 1975; I began a study of angiosperm leaf cuticles from Doyle & Hickey, 1976; Hickey & Doyle, 1977; the Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group of Vir- Hickey, 1978). These newer studies show that ginia and Maryland to test previous ideas on practically all of the older leaf identifications are early flowering plant evolution. At first, cuticular incorrect and that successively younger Creta- leaves were known only from the upper part of ceous angiosperm floras show the progressively the Potomac Group (Palynosubzone 11-B of higher levels of advancement predicted by many Brenner, or probably middle to late Albian), but, modem systems of classification (cf. Cronquist, later on, organically preserved leaves were col- 1968, 1981; Takhtajan, 1969, 1980; Thome, lected from the lower part as well (Palynozone I 1976). These results indicate that the Cretaceous of Brenner, or probably Aptian). This provided I would like to thank James Doyle, Leo Hickey, and Charles Beck for their guidance and encouragement during the course of this project; James McClammer for his help in the field; and my wife Amy for typing early drafts of this manuscript. This work represents doctoral research conducted at the University of Michigan and postdoctoral research conducted at the Smithsonian Institution. Research was supported by grants from the Rackham School of Graduate Studies and Scott Turner Fund, University of Michigan, and a postdoctoral fellowship from the Smithsonian Institution. Paleontology and Stratigraphy Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, M.S. 9 19,25 Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225. 19841 UPCHURCH-CUTICLE EVOLUTION 523 the opportunity to compare the stratigraphic Observations were made on cuticle slides in the changes seen in the systematic affinities and Indiana University paleobotanical collections, structural diversity of angiosperm leaf cuticles cleared leaves at the United States National Mu- with those observed for leaf architecture and pol- seum, and cuticles prepared by myself for light len morphology. This report summarizes the re- and scanning electron microscopy. Light micro- sults of this investigation and their possible sig- scope preparations were made from leaf frag- nificance for flowering plant evolution: included ments that were macerated in modified Jeffrey's are a comparison of the diversity of cuticular and solution (Stace, 1965), stained in Safi-anin 0,then leaf architectural features, an assessment of mod- mounted in glycerine jelly or Piccolyte. SEM em affinities based on cuticular anatomy, and preparations were made in a manner similar to two major evolutionary trends suggested by the that for the fossils, except that unmacerated leaves morphological relationships of cuticular features were either boiled or shaken ultrasonically in eth- in conjunction with their stratigraphic distribu- anol for 30 minutes to remove the waxes and tion. adhering debris. All specimens were coated with carbon, then gold/palladium, and observed at 20 kV. MATERIALSAND METHODS All organically preserved leaftypes known from Zone I and Subzone 11-B were prepared using a combination of standard methods (cf. Dilcher, ZONE I ANGIOSPERM LEAVES 1974). For light microscopy, cuticles were de- Zone I angiosperm leaves exhibit low diversity mineralized in HF, macerated in Schulze's so- in their venation, shape, and marginal configu- lution followed by dilute alkali, stained in an ration compared to later Cretaceous and modem aqueous solution of Safranin 0,and mounted on flowering plants. All Zone I leaves are simple slides in glycerinejelly. Preparations for scanning and have pinnate venation, although in some electron microscopy (SEM) varied according to groups the secondary veins are clustered or the surface studied. External features were ob- strengthened near the base of the leaf (also re- served on unmacerated, demineralized leaf frag- ported by Hickey & Doyle, 1977). Most leaftypes ments. Internal features were observed on mac- possess festooned brochidodromous secondary erated cuticle that was dried down to SEM stubs venation (or secondariesthat form several orders coated with Duco cement in a chamber saturated of loops within the margin) (e.g., Fig. 2), but with acetone vapor. All specimens were coated Vitiphyllum multzfrdum and a new serrate form with gold and observed at 15 kV. have simple craspedodromous secondary vena- Plant debris from Zone I was analyzed to de- tion (or secondaries that run directly into lobes termine how much of the diversity of cuticle types or teeth) (Fig. 1). The teeth of at least some leaf was missing from the one known organically pre- groups are a variant of the Chloranthoid type of served leaf assemblage. Samples were obtained Hickey and Wolfe (1975), with a biconvex shape, by disaggregatingthe rock in HFor Na,CO,, then a large gland, and a pair of lateral veins that sieving the slurry through 100 mesh screen. follow the margin and fuse with the gland (Fig. Unoxidized plant fragments were prepared as 4). Zone I leaves also show a low systematic di- above, using a centrifuge, and mounted in glyc- versity compared to later Potomac Group an- erine jelly on slides or in glycerine between pairs giosperms: only 12 leaf types are recognized from of paraffin-sealed cover slips. Naturally macer- Zone I, as opposed to over 30 from Subzone 11-B ated cuticle was mounted in glycerine in paraffin- (Hickey & Doyle, 1977). sealed slides pending further study. The most distinctive feature of Zone I leaf ar- Extant angiosperm leaf cuticles were examined chitecture is the low degree of organization in to test ideas on the relationships of Potomac the vein network. Secondary veins are irregularly Group leaves to modem forms. Taxa were se- spaced, enclose areas of variable size and shape, lected for study based on two criteria: 1. their and often branch decurrently (e.g., Fig. 2). Ter- relative primitiveness according to the phylo- tiary and higher order veins are poorly differ- genetic schemes of Cronquist (1 968, 198 I), entiated from the secondariesand have a random Takhtajan (1969,1980), and Thorne (1976), and course. This "first rank" pattern of venation oc- 2. their similarity to Potomac Group angio- curs today in such primitive families as Winter- sperms in leaf venation and pollen morphology. aceae and Canellaceae and is considered primi- 524 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN [VOL.71 dm.: 9. , ,.. ," ,, , '.\* ,.* , * ;;\. 1 .,. *,' ,.,\ w*i. 0 FIGURES1--6. Organically preserved Zone I leaf types. - 1. Drewrys Bluff Leaf Type #1 (DBLT #I). University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology (UMMP) 64887, x 1.5.-2. Celastrophyllurn sp. with associated stem fragment.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us