112 2017-18 NEBRASKA WOMEN'S BASKETBALL BIG TEN TEAM STATISTICS SCORING OFFENSE Team G Pts. Avg. 1. Maryland 35 3,125 89.3 2. Ohio State 35 2,999 85.7 3. Michigan 37 2,846 76.9 4. Iowa 34 2,588 76.1 5. Indiana 34 2,547 74.9 6. Minnesota 31 2,286 73.7 7. Michigan State 33 2,421 73.4 8. Penn State 32 2,325 72.7 9. Northwestern 31 2,120 68.4 10. Purdue 36 2,425 67.4 11. Nebraska 29 1,820 62.8 12. Illinois 31 1,935 62.4 13. Wisconsin 31 1,887 60.9 14. Rutgers 30 1,516 50.5 SCORING DEFENSE Team G Pts. Avg. 1. Purdue 36 2,153 59.8 2. Rutgers 30 1,849 61.6 3. Michigan 37 2,886 61.8 4. Maryland 35 2,256 64.5 5. Northwestern 31 2,001 64.5 6. Indiana 34 2,205 64.9 7. Penn State 32 2,106 65.8 8. Michigan State 33 2,208 66.9 9. Iowa 34 2,338 68.8 10. Wisconsin 31 2,162 69.7 11. Illinois 31 2,172 70.1 12. Ohio State 35 2,503 71.5 13. Minnesota 31 2,308 74.5 14. Nebraska 29 2,214 76.3 SCORING MARGIN Hannah Whitish ranked among the top freshman guards in the Big Ten with her 1.9 assist-to-turnover Team Off. Def. Margin ratio in conference play in 2016-17. Whitish also ranked among the top 10 guards in the Big Ten by hitting 1. Maryland 89.3 64.5 +24.8 41.8 percent of her three-point attempts in conference action. 2. Michigan 76.9 61.8 +15.1 3. Ohio State 85.7 71.5 +14.2 7. Michigan 877 2,198 .399 11. Maryland 206 624 .330 4. Indiana 74.9 64.9 +10.1 8. Wisconsin 764 1,909 .400 12. Rutgers 176 533 .330 5. Purdue 67.4 59.8 +7.6 9. Penn State 764 1,908 .400 13. Ohio State 266 786 .338 6. Iowa 76.1 68.8 +7.4 10. Minnesota 880 2,190 .402 14. Nebraska 226 662 .341 11. Illinois 752 1,870 .402 7. Penn State 72.7 65.8 +6.8 3-POINT FG MADE PER GAME 8. Michigan State 73.4 66.9 +6.5 12. Rutgers 627 1,550 .405 Team G 3FG Avg. 9. Northwestern 68.4 64.5 +3.8 13. Indiana 826 1,969 .420 1. Ohio State 35 273 7.8 10. Minnesota 73.7 74.5 -0.7 14. Nebraska 830 1,864 .445 2. Michigan State 33 252 7.6 11. Illinois 62.4 70.1 -7.6 3. Michigan 37 279 7.5 12. Wisconsin 60.9 69.7 -8.9 3-POINT FG PERCENTAGE 4. Nebraska 29 197 6.8 13. Rutgers 50.5 61.6 -11.1 Team FG FGA PCT. 5. Minnesota 31 203 6.5 14. Nebraska 62.8 76.3 -13.6 1. Michigan 279 733 .381 2. Maryland 217 580 .374 6. Illinois 31 197 6.4 FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE 3. Michigan State 252 691 .365 7. Indiana 34 216 6.4 Team FG FGA Pct. 4. Ohio State 273 780 .350 8. Maryland 35 217 6.2 1. Maryland 1,194 2,340 .510 5. Penn State 193 569 .339 9. Penn State 32 193 6.0 2. Iowa 953 2,024 .471 6. Indiana 216 638 .339 10. Iowa 34 196 5.8 3. Michigan 1,057 2,295 .461 7. Purdue 177 528 .335 11. Wisconsin 31 159 5.1 4. Ohio State 1,101 2,426 .454 8. Northwestern 156 480 .325 12. Northwestern 31 156 5.0 5. Indiana 934 2,086 .448 9. Minnesota 203 629 .323 13. Purdue 36 177 4.9 6. Michigan State 889 2,017 .441 10. Nebraska 197 613 .321 14. Rutgers 30 127 4.2 11. Wisconsin 159 510 .312 7. Purdue 904 2,094 .432 FREE THROW PERCENTAGE 8. Penn State 858 2,003 .428 12. Iowa 196 630 .311 Team FTM FTA Pct. 9. Northwestern 786 1,883 .417 13. Illinois 197 635 .310 1. Illinois 290 376 .771 10. Minnesota 810 2,045 .396 14. Rutgers 127 451 .282 2. Michigan State 391 527 .742 11. Nebraska 668 1,728 .387 3. Indiana 463 629 .736 12. Illinois 724 1,890 .383 3-POINT FG PERCENTAGE DEFENSE 4. Iowa 486 662 .734 13. Wisconsin 671 1,770 .379 Team FG FGA PCT. 5. Michigan 453 622 .728 14. Rutgers 585 1,684 .347 1. Iowa 189 635 .298 2. Michigan State 173 579 .299 6. Northwestern 392 539 .727 FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE DEFENSE 3. Purdue 189 613 .308 7. Minnesota 463 644 .719 Team FG FGA Pct. 4. Penn State 196 635 .309 8. Purdue 440 618 .712 1. Ohio State 871 2,316 .376 5. Indiana 189 604 .313 9. Maryland 520 736 .707 2. Purdue 821 2,168 .379 6. Michigan 216 687 .314 10. Penn State 416 592 .703 3. Northwestern 716 1,884 .380 7. Northwestern 205 649 .316 11. Ohio State 524 756 .693 4. Iowa 882 2,259 .390 8. Illinois 226 700 .323 12. Rutgers 219 327 .670 5. Michigan State 777 1,981 .392 9. Minnesota 236 718 .329 13. Wisconsin 386 603 .640 6. Maryland 846 2,156 .392 10. Wisconsin 219 665 .329 14. Nebraska 287 481 .597 INTRODUCTION . THIS IS NEBRASKA . ADMINISTRATION . COACHES . MEET THE HUSKERS . OPPONENTS . REVIEW . RECORDS . TRADITION HUSKERS.COM @HUSKERSWBB #HUSKERS 113 BIG TEN TEAM STATISTICS REBOUND MARGIN 6. Ohio State 35 272 7.8 10. Minnesota 16.0 15.0 -1.0 Team Opp. 7. Purdue 36 279 7.8 11. Iowa 16.4 14.5 -1.9 Team Avg. Avg. Margin 8. Minnesota 31 225 7.3 12. Michigan State 16.0 14.0 -2.0 1. Maryland 44.5 30.5 +13.9 9. Iowa 34 231 6.8 13. Nebraska 17.6 13.5 -4.1 2. Michigan State 40.2 35.1 +5.1 10. Penn State 32 217 6.8 14. Wisconsin 19.2 14.6 -4.6 3. Indiana 37.7 33.1 +4.7 11. Illinois 31 209 6.7 4. Ohio State 44.4 39.9 +4.5 12. Nebraska 29 189 6.5 ASSIST-TO-TURNOVER RATIO 5. Michigan 37.9 33.8 +4.1 13. Michigan State 33 215 6.5 Team Assist TO Ratio 6. Penn State 39.4 36.3 +3.2 14. Wisconsin 31 197 6.4 1. Maryland 694 518 1.3 7. Purdue 38.2 35.6 +2.6 2. Indiana 564 438 1.3 8. Iowa 39.2 37.3 +2.0 ASSISTS 3. Ohio State 569 483 1.2 9. Wisconsin 39.3 37.8 +1.5 Team G Assists Avg. 4. Michigan 602 526 1.1 10. Minnesota 43.6 43.4 +0.2 1. Maryland 35 694 19.8 5. Northwestern 503 445 1.1 11. Northwestern 38.5 39.3 -0.8 2. Michigan State 33 583 17.7 6. Purdue 572 516 1.1 12. Nebraska 37.5 40.1 -2.6 3. Iowa 34 600 17.6 7. Michigan State 583 528 1.1 13. Rutgers 33.8 37.7 -4.0 4. Indiana 34 564 16.6 8. Iowa 600 559 1.1 14. Illinois 34.3 41.0 -6.8 5. Michigan 37 602 16.3 9. Penn State 426 417 1.0 6. Ohio State 35 569 16.3 10. Nebraska 447 509 0.9 TEAM REBOUNDING AVERAGE 7. Northwestern 31 503 16.2 11. Minnesota 419 497 0.8 Team G Reb. Avg. 8. Purdue 36 572 15.9 12. Illinois 348 424 0.8 1. Maryland 35 1,556 44.5 9. Nebraska 29 447 15.4 13. Rutgers 343 491 0.7 2. Ohio State 35 1,554 44.4 10. Minnesota 31 419 13.5 14. Wisconsin 384 596 0.6 3. Minnesota 31 1,353 43.6 11. Penn State 32 426 13.3 4. Michigan State 33 1,328 40.2 12. Wisconsin 31 384 12.4 BLOCKED SHOTS 5. Penn State 32 1,262 39.4 13. Rutgers 30 343 11.4 Team G Blocks Avg. 6. Wisconsin 31 1,219 39.3 14. Illinois 31 348 11.2 1. Ohio State 35 213 6.1 7. Iowa 34 1,334 39.2 2. Northwestern 31 174 5.6 8. Northwestern 31 1,192 38.5 TURNOVER MARGIN 3. Maryland 35 174 5.0 9. Purdue 36 1,376 38.2 Team Opp. 4. Purdue 36 175 4.9 10. Michigan 37 1,403 37.9 Team Avg. Avg. Margin 5. Iowa 34 131 3.9 11. Indiana 34 1,283 37.7 1. Maryland 14.8 18.1 +3.3 6. Minnesota 31 114 3.7 12. Nebraska 29 1,088 37.5 2. Michigan 14.2 17.1 +2.9 7. Illinois 31 112 3.6 13. Illinois 31 1,062 34.3 3. Indiana 12.9 15.6 +2.7 8. Michigan State 33 115 3.5 14. Rutgers 30 1,013 33.8 4. Ohio State 13.8 16.2 +2.4 9. Rutgers 30 100 3.3 5. Penn State 13.0 15.3 +2.3 10. Michigan 37 122 3.3 OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS 6. Northwestern 14.4 16.2 +1.8 11. Penn State 32 98 3.1 Team G OReb.