Constraints on the Depths and Thermal Vigor of Basalt Formation in the Martian Mantle

Constraints on the Depths and Thermal Vigor of Basalt Formation in the Martian Mantle

The Mantle of Mars: Insights from Theory, Geophysics, High-Pressure Studies, and Meteorites (2012) 6019.pdf CONSTRAINTS ON THE DEPTHS AND THERMAL VIGOR OF BASALT FORMATION IN THE MARTIAN MANTLE. J. Filiberto1 and R. Dasgupta2, 1Southern Illinois University, [email protected], 2Rice Uni- versity, [email protected]. Introduction: Until recently, the SNC meteorites meteorite Yamato 980459 show a multiple saturation represented the only source of information about mar- of the melt with olivine and a low-calcium pyroxene at tian igneous chemistry [1]. This changed with the Mars 1.2 GPa and 1540 ± 10 °C [8], suggesting that the me- Exploration Rovers, which have analyzed basalts on teorite represents a primary melt that separated from its the surface of Mars in Gusev Crater and Meridiani mantle source at a depth of ~100 km. The geochemical Planum [2, 3]. Compared to the Martian meteorite bas- modeling results [15] for surface basalts from Gusev alts, the basalts in Gusev Crater are thought to be much Crater show a range in pressure-temperature of for- older (~3.65 vs. 1.0-0.17 Ga) [4, 5] and have distinctly mation from 1-2 GPa and 1300-1525°C consistent with different chemistries [6]. Because of the differences in experimental results on the Home Plate basalt Fastball basalt chemistry, we can constrain how the Martian [12]. Bounce Rock in Meridiani planum shows a P-T mantle may have changed through time. of formation of 0.6 GPa and 1410°C. Pressure-Temperature Estimates of Martian Implications: The Gusev Basalts and Bounce Rock Basalt Genesis: Inverse Experimental Modeling Ap- are both thought to be Noachian in age (4.5-3.6 Ga) proach: Near-liquidus phase relations can show wheth- based on geomorphology and crater counting [5, 16] er or not a basalt could be a primitive mantle derived and give the same range in mantle potential tempera- liquid [7]. This approach has been applied to the Mar- tures (1445 ± 80 °C and 1475 ± 15 °C [15]) and initial tian basalts: meteorites Yamato 980459 [8] and NWA melting pressures (2.7-5 GPa and 4.0-4.6 GPa [15]); 1068 [9] and to the Adirondack-class basalt Humphrey yet, these basalts were analyzed in different locations analyzed on Mars at Gusev Crater [10, 11] and the on the surface. This suggests that the average mantle Home Plate-class pyroclastic basalt Fastball [12]. potential temperature calculated (1450 ± 80 °C) for Geochemical Modeling Approach: To estimate the these basalts may represent a global average for the pressures and temperatures of formation of calculated Martian mantle during the Noachian. If we compare primary magmas, we can also use olivine-melt Mg- our estimate of ancient Martian mantle potential tem- exchange thermometry [13, 14] and silica activity in perature with the terrestrial mantle potential tempera- the melt barometry [14]. This approach has been ap- tures based on Archean komatiites [≥ 1700°C; [17]], plied to the Martian surface basalts in Gusev Crater we observe that the Martian mantle was actually signif- and Bounce Rock in Meridiani Panum [15]. icantly colder than the terrestrial mantle. Temperature (oC) The younger (472 ± 47 Ma for Y98; [18]) Martian 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 meteorites suggest a hotter mantle potential tempera- 0 0 ture [8]. However, they may not represent a global es- 1 85 timate for the basaltic magmas on Mars and instead 2 170 they may represent localized thermal anomalies [8, 14] Home Plate similar to thermal anomalies (beneath ocean islands 3 Adirondack-Class 255 Wishstone-Class Humboldt Peak such as Hawaii) in the Earth [e.g., 13]. Future studies Irvine-Class 340 4 Depth (km) Backstay documenting basaltic compositions from relatively Pressure (GPa) Bounce 425 younger Martian surface of known locations will be 5 Fastball MSP Humphrey MSP Y98 MSP necessary to evaluate secular cooling of the whole 6 510 1068 MSP Martian mantle through time. Mantle Solidus Mantle Adiabat References: [1] McSween H.Y. (2002) MaPS 37, 7-25. [2] Squyres S.W. et al. (2004) Science 305, 794-799. [3] Zipfel J. et al. (2001) Figure 1. Temperatures and pressures calculated for primitive MaPS, 46, 1-20. [4] Nyquist L.E. et al. (2001) Space Sci Rev 96, magma compositions for basalts from Gusev Crater and Meridiani 105-164. [5] Greeley R. et al. (2005) JGR, 110, E05008. [6] Planum [15]. Experimental results for the olivine-orthopyroxene McSween H.Y. et al. (2009) Science 324, 736-739. [7] Asimow multiple saturation pressure for Fastball, Humphrey, Yamato P.D. and Longhi J (2004) J Pet 45, 2349-2367. [8] Musselwhite D.S. et al. (2006) MaPS 41, 1271-1290. [9] Filiberto J. et al. (2010) 980459 (Y98) and NWA 1068 are shown [8-12]. Also shown for MaPS 45, 1258-1270. [10] Filiberto J. et al. (2008) MaPS 43, 1137- reference, by the dashed line, is the solidus of Martian mantle and, 1146. [11] Monders A.G. et al. (2007) MaPS 42, 131-148. [12] by solid line, the mantle adiabat [15]. Filiberto J. et al. (2010) GJR, 37, L13201. [13] Putirka K.D. G- Results: Figure 1 shows the estimates of pressures cubed 6, 10.1029/2005gc000915. [14] Lee C.-T.A. et al. EPSL 279, 20-33. [15] Filiberto J. and Dasgupta R. (2011) EPSL 304, 527-537. and temperatures of basalt genesis for surface basalts [16] Arvidson R.E. et al. (2003) JGR 108, 8073. [17] Lee C.-T.A. et and meteorites based on the experimental and geo- al. (2010) Nature, 463, 930-933. [18] Shih, C.Y. et al. (2005) chemical modeling results. The experimental results for Antarctic Meteorite Research 18, 46. .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us