Marine Ecology Progress Series 621:19

Marine Ecology Progress Series 621:19

Vol. 621: 19–32, 2019 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published July 4 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12974 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Regional differences in supply of organic matter from kelp forests drive trophodynamics of temperate reef fish J. A. Udy1, S. R. Wing1,*, S. A. O’Connell-Milne1, L. M. Durante1, R. M. McMullin1, S. Kolodzey1, R. D. Frew2 1Department of Marine Science, and 2Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand ABSTRACT: Regional differences in trophic structure and availability of alternate sources of basal organic matter to food webs can affect the volume of organic matter converted into fish biomass. The present study combined stable isotope analyses (δ13C and δ15N) with estimates of biomass den- sity of 22 common reef fishes to compare supply of organic matter derived from macroalgae versus phytoplankton to reef fish communities among 30 sites distributed across Fiordland and the Marl- borough Sounds, 2 contrasting regions in terms of land-based stressors on the South Island, New Zealand. Fish communities in the Marlborough Sounds were supported by food webs that incorpo- rated less organic matter derived from macroalgae compared to those in Fiordland. Contribution of organic matter derived from macroalgae to fish biomass decreased with trophic level in the Marl- borough Sounds, while fishes in Fiordland were supported by a more equal mixture of organic matter derived from phytoplankton and macroalgae among trophic levels. Total fish biomass density was 1.72 times higher in Fiordland, yet the fish community converted 2.91 times more organ ic mat- ter to fish biomass, as a result of a higher proportion of biomass at high trophic levels. The observed patterns were consistent with limitation in supply of organic matter derived from macroalgae in the Marlborough Sounds, where extensive losses of kelp forest habitat linked to land-based stressors have been reported. The results highlight the importance of considering regional variability in basal organic matter source pools, particularly those produced from sensitive kelp forest habitats, when applying ecosystem-based approaches to managing coastal resources. KEY WORDS: Kelp forest · Reef fish · Trophic level · Organic matter · Food web · Fisheries 1. INTRODUCTION pattern and dynamics of primary production in the world’s oceans, particularly in the coastal zone (John- Fisheries production can be constrained by the son et al. 2011, Koenigstein et al. 2016, Krumhansl et amount of primary production available at the base al. 2016). Changes of this nature are especially ap - of the food web (Ware & Thomson 2005, Friedland et parent in kelp forest systems, where environmental al. 2012, Watson et al. 2013). Additionally, differen - changes wrought from coastal eutrophication, mar- ces in the trophic structure of the community strongly ine heat waves and proliferation of sea urchins have affect trophodynamics: how energy is transferred up dramatically modified the distribution and abun- the food web as well as the energy requirements of dance of kelp forests in many parts of the world (Day- the community (Pauly & Christensen 1995). Anthro- ton et al. 1998, Wernberg et al. 2016). As a conse- pogenic impacts such as nutrient runoff, increased quence, elucidating the trophic structure of marine sedimentation and climate change are altering the communities, and the sources of basal organic matter © The authors 2019. Open Access under Creative Commons by *Corresponding author: [email protected] Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are un - restricted. Authors and original publication must be credited. Publisher: Inter-Research · www.int-res.com 20 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 621: 19–32, 2019 required to support them, is a vital component of ‘hump shaped’ structure when graphed on axes of effective ecosystem-based models for fisheries man- percent contribution of alternate organic matter agement and for predicting how changes to critical sources versus trophic level (McMeans et al. 2013). habitats such as kelp forests may affect the function- Rooney et al. (2006) demonstrated that this relation- ing of marine ecosystems (Persson et al. 2014, Wing & ship is present across a diverse variety of ecosystems. Jack 2014, Wing et al. 2015). For example, in coastal marine systems, if both pri- The 2 primary sources of basal organic matter for mary sources of organic matter, in the present case temperate reef communities are phytoplankton and macroalgae and phytoplankton, are sufficiently avail- macroalgae (Fredriksen 2003, Koenigs et al. 2015, able, top level consumers will be supported by an von Biela et al. 2016), with additional inputs from sea approximately equal mixture of organic matter derived grasses and terrestrial sources in some habitats (Jack from the 2 sources (Rooney et al. 2006). et al. 2009, McLeod et al. 2010a). In this context, kelp As a result of their high trophic level, reef fish act forest habitats can be extremely productive and pro- as effective integrators for the flux of organic matter vide important autochthonous sources of organic from macroalgae and phytoplankton through coastal matter for coastal food webs (Mann 1973, Duggins et food webs (Thomas & Cahoon 1993, Vander Zanden al. 1989, Koenigs et al. 2015). Macroalgae are con- & Vadeboncoeur 2002, Hamilton et al. 2011). A major- sumed directly by herbivorous reef fish, and by ity of temperate reef fish employ generalist feeding invertebrate grazers that then provide prey for strategies, and their diets reflect the relative avail- omnivorous and predatory reef fish (Graham 2004, ability of their prey, and hence the relative availabil- Norderhaug et al. 2006, Davenport & Anderson ity of the basal organic matter sources for the food 2007). Phytoplankton production is more seasonally webs that support those prey (Cowen 1986, McLeod variable, but nevertheless an important source of et al. 2010b, Jack & Wing 2011). Consequently, if 1 organic matter for the food webs underlying most organic matter source is limited, then one would coastal reef fish communities (Koenigs et al. 2015, expect the top predators to acquire the majority of Docmac et al. 2017, Truong et al. 2017). Organic mat- their organic matter from the alternate, more abun- ter derived from phytoplankton is primarily passed dant, source (McCann & Rooney 2009). through food webs to reef fish through feeding on As organic matter is transferred up the food web, zooplankton, migrating pelagic forage fishes (Tre- approximately 90% is lost in terms of biomass with bilco et al. 2016, Truong et al. 2017), or suspension each trophic transfer (Pauly & Christensen 1995, feeding invertebrates (Miller & Page 2012). The rela- Ware 2000). As a consequence, the amount of basal tive contribution of organic matter derived from organic matter required to support a fish at trophic macroalgae and phytoplankton to consumers is level 4 is an order of magnitude higher than the strongly influenced by food web structure and the organic matter required to support a fish of equal magnitude of inputs from each source at the base. biomass at trophic level 3. Therefore, if supply of one Consequentially differences in the feeding ecology organic matter source is limited, then as organic mat- among primary consumers can strongly influence ter is transferred up the food web to higher trophic routing of alternate organic matter sources within levels, the proportion of organic matter acquired food webs and result in large differences in the con- from the alternate, more abundant, source will in - tribution of alternate basal organic matter sources to crease (McCann & Rooney 2009). In this context, for higher trophic level species. temperate reef fishes, if the supply of organic matter Primary consumers tend to derive a high propor- derived from kelp forests is limited, then high trophic tion of their organic matter from a single source, level fish may increase their use of subsidies from either phytoplankton or macroalgae (Rooney et al. external pelagic sources to meet their high energy 2006, Hamilton et al. 2014). At higher trophic levels, demands (Trebilco et al. 2016). These relationships secondary and tertiary consumers are supported by a provide a valuable method for resolving patterns in more even mixture of the available organic matter limitation of basal organic matter supply within natu- sources as the variety of underlying trophic connec- ral food webs. tions increases (McMeans et al. 2013, Koenigs et al. Kelp forests are currently under threat from a va - 2015). In diverse communities, coupling of different riety of anthropogenic activities with evidence for energy channels at high trophic levels confers stabil- widespread losses of kelp bed habitat along coast- ity in food webs (Rooney et al. 2006). Theoretically, if lines worldwide (Dayton et al. 1998, Steneck et al. higher trophic level consumers are better able to 2002, Connell et al. 2008). Macroalgae are an impor- integrate prey, then the food web should have a tant organic matter source for many reef fish commu- Udy et al.: Trophodynamics of reef fish 21 nities (Koenigs et al. 2015, von Biela et al. 2016); In the present study, we used stable isotope analyses therefore, a contraction of kelp forest habitats may to determine the trophic level of, and contribution of affect the structure, stability and productivity of tem- organic matter derived from macroalgae to the 22 perate reef food webs (McMeans et al. 2013, Markel most common fish species

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us