Biogeographic Variability in Ecosystem Engineering: Patterns in the Abundance and Behavior of the Tube-Building Polychaete Diopatra Cuprea

Biogeographic Variability in Ecosystem Engineering: Patterns in the Abundance and Behavior of the Tube-Building Polychaete Diopatra Cuprea

Vol. 447: 1–13, 2012 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 13 doi: 10.3354/meps09568 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Biogeographic variability in ecosystem engineering: patterns in the abundance and behavior of the tube-building polychaete Diopatra cuprea Sarah K. Berke* Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Rd, Edgewater, Maryland 21037, USA Present address: Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA ABSTRACT: Ecosystem engineering is an important process influencing the structure and function of eco - systems worldwide. Geographic variation in a species’ engineering processes can thus have important impli- cations for spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In this study I explore geographic variability in the en- gineering properties of an important organism in marine sedimentary habitats, the polychaete Diopatra cuprea. In the Northwest Atlantic, D. cuprea facilitates benthic communities by creating predation refugia and substrate—both density-dependent processes— and by actively attaching macroalgae to its tube. D. cuprea’s ecosystem-engineering properties thus arise from both its abundance and its behavior. I show that both components of D. cuprea engineering decrease precipitously at low latitudes. I assess the relationship The polychaete Diopatra cuprea (left), an ecosystem engi- between these patterns and a suite of environmental neer, typically decorates its tube with algae (top right)— parameters, finding that northern versus southern except in Florida (bottom right). sites cluster separately in multivariate environmental Photos: S. Berke space and that temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH may contribute to both D. cuprea abundance and the biomass of facilitated algae. I present evidence that southern D. cuprea populations may be affected by KEY WORDS: Benthic habitats · Biogenic habitat post-recruitment mortality more severely than north- structure · Biogeographic comparison · Facilitation · ern populations. Finally, I experimentally demonstrate Infauna · Intertidal macroalgae · Intertidal sediments · that D. cuprea’s failure to facilitate algae in its south - Northwest Atlantic ern range is not due to latitudinal differences in algal Resale or republication not permitted without availability, acceptability or retainability, but rather is written consent of the publisher a behavioral shift driven by still-unknown factors. This study demonstrates dramatic geographic variability INTRODUCTION in both D. cuprea’s density—with strong implications for its density-dependent engineering functions—and Many organisms physically create or modify habi- D. cuprea’s algal facilitation. Disentangling the mech- anisms underlying such variability is an important tats. Such processes constitute ecosystem engineer- goal for understanding spatial heterogeneity in the ing, a fundamental class of ecological interactions structure and function of Northwest Atlantic shallow- occurring in most, if not all, ecosystems (Wright & water sedimentary systems. Jones 2006, Cuddington et al. 2007). Factors which *Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2012 · www.int-res.com 2 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 447: 1–13, 2012 influence variation in ecosystem engineering are (Bertness et al. 1999, Burnaford 2004, Irving & Con- important because of their potential to influence vari- nell 2006). D. cuprea’s algal attachment behavior is ation in ecosystem structure and function. Ecosystem also currently facilitating the invasion of Gracilaria engineering effects are expected to vary across envi- vermiculophylla, a red alga that now represents 90% ronmental gradients (Cuddington & Hastings 2004, of algal biomass in some Northwest Atlantic habitats Crain & Bertness 2006, Wright & Jones 2006, Wright (Thomsen et al. 2006). Thus, D. cuprea’s population et al. 2006). For example, cushion plants have posi- density and algal attachment behavior together mod- tive effects on species diversity and evenness, but the ify both the physical environment and community effect size varies across 20° of latitude and 2800 m composition of many shallow-water marine sedimen- elevation (Badano & Cavieres 2006). Similarly, shrubs tary habitats in the Northwest Atlantic. enhance species richness at several spatial scales This study asks 3 questions: (1) Does Diopatra with varying effect size depending on precipitation cuprea abundance vary with latitude? (2) Does the (Wright et al. 2006). Seagrass beds en hance the extent of algal facilitation vary with latitude—and if diversity and abundance of fish and deca pods differ- so, is this the result of latitudinal differences in the ently depending on bed position within an estuary worm’s ability to find and retain acceptable algae? (3) (Bell & Westoby 1986), and oyster reefs have dif- Does either pattern correlate with environmental ferent effects on species richness and evenness factors? I will show that D. cuprea ’s role as ecosys- across a disturbance gradient (Kimbro & Gros holz tem engineer varies over its range as a result of 2006). Although ecosystem engineering is known to (1) decreased abundance at low latitudes, possibly vary geographically in many systems, more work is driven by a suite of environmental factors and/or needed to document and understand large-scale pat- intense post-recruitment mortality, and (2) decreased terns in such variability. Here I present a case study algal facilitation at low latitudes, driven by geo- showing remarkable geographic variation over 15° of graphic changes in the worm’s algal attachment be - latitude in the ecosystem-engineering properties of havior. These geographic patterns likely contribute the polychaete Diopatra cuprea (Bosc, 1802) in inter- to large-scale spatial heterogeneity in the ecology tidal marine sediments of the Northwest Atlantic. of marine sedimentary habitats of the Northwest Marine sedimentary habitats are often structured Atlantic. by burrowing and tube-building infauna. Tubes sta- bilize sediments at depth while enhancing surface erosion (Fager 1964, Eckman et al. 1981, Luckenbach MATERIALS AND METHODS 1986) and influence many benthic processes includ- ing sediment deposition, microbial activities, diffu- Diopatra cuprea ecology and engineering sion, advection, and recruitment (Eckman 1985, 1990, mechanisms Huettel & Gust 1992, Boudreau & Jørgensen 2001). Onuphid polychaetes, with their large and robust Diopatra cuprea occurs commonly in sheltered tubes, are particularly important tube-builders in intertidal sediments of the Northwest Atlantic, toler- tropical and temperate sediments worldwide. In the ating a range of sediment types from sandy mud to eastern United States, sedimentary habitats are often coarse sand and a range of salinities from fully dominated by the onuphid Diopatra cuprea, which marine to polyhaline conditions near the mouths of has well-known ecosystem-engineering effects medi- tidal estuaries. D. cuprea ranges from Cape Cod to ated by both population density and behavior. D. Brazil (Fauchald 1977). Cold winter temperatures cuprea tubes provide both substrate and predation likely set the northern limit, given that feeding ceases refugia; thus, the abundance and diversity of infauna below 5°C and tube maintenance ceases below 1.8°C and epibenthic fauna should both correlate positively (Mangum & Cox 1971, Myers 1972, see also Berke with D. cuprea density (Woodin 1978, 1981, Lucken- et al. 2010). Adult D. cuprea occur as far north as bach 1987, Dudley et al. 1989, Diaz et al. 2003). D. Duxbury, Massachusetts (42.05° N, just north of Cape cuprea also actively ‘decorates’ its tube with foreign Cod), but this population does not experience annual material including algal fragments, facilitating an recruitment, putting the northern limit for successful extensive algal canopy in habitats that would other- reproduction somewhere between Barnstable Harbor wise lack stable communities of attached macroalgae and Duxbury (S. Berke pers. obs., D. Wethey & S. (Thomsen & McGlathery 2005). Algal canopies posi- Woodin pers. comm.). D. cuprea is most abundant tively affect marine communities by providing struc- near the mean low water line, only sparsely extend- tural heterogeneity, predation refugia, and shading ing to the shallow subtidal and the high intertidal Berke: Geographic variability in an ecosystem-engineering polychaete 3 (Barwis 1985, Peckol & Baxter 1986, Skoog et al. infauna and epifauna, above and beyond the struc- 1994). The worm builds large tubes (~1 cm diameter) tural effect of the tube alone (Thomsen et al. 2010). that penetrate ≥1 m into the sediment and rise sev- The 2 key components of D. cuprea engineering, eral centimeters above the sediment surface; this then, are (1) its abundance and (2) its algal attach- emergent portion is called the ‘tube cap’. ment behavior, which interact to physically modify Diopatra cuprea facilitates macroalgae, epibenthic the habitat and alter the community composition of fauna, and infauna. Like most Diopatra spp., D. infauna, epifauna, and algae in sheltered mud flats of cuprea actively attaches algae and other materials the Northwest Atlantic. to its tube cap. The worm captures drift algae by extending 10 cm or more from its tube, capturing drift algae with its palps and jaws, maneuvering it Observational data into position, and integrating it into the tube wall with a mucous secretion (Myers 1972). Algae thus Abundance patterns. To evaluate geographic pat- attached form an extensive

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us