Preparing the CAREC Transport Corridor III (Dushanbe–Uzbekistan

Preparing the CAREC Transport Corridor III (Dushanbe–Uzbekistan

Technical Assistance Report Project Number: 42052 May 2008 Republic of Tajikistan: Preparing the CAREC Transport Corridor III (Dushanbe–Uzbekistan Border Road) Project (Financed by the Regional Cooperation and Integration Fund under the Regional Cooperation and Integration Financing Partnership Facility) The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 22 April 2008) Currency Unit – somoni (TJS) TJS1.00 = $0.2920 $1.00 = TJS3.4239 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AH – affected household CAREC – Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CSD – Customs Service Department EA – executing agency GDP – gross domestic product HIV/AIDS – human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome IEE – initial environmental examination IP – indigenous people MOTC – Ministry of Transport and Communications TA – technical assistance WEIGHTS AND MEASURES km – kilometer vpd – vehicles per day TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CLASSIFICATION Targeting Classification – General intervention Sector – Transport and communications Subsector – Roads and highways Themes – Sustainable economic growth, regional cooperation Subthemes – Fostering physical infrastructure development, cross-border infrastructure NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Vice President L. Jin, Vice President (Operations 1) Director General J. Miranda, Central and West Asia Department (CWRD) Director H. Wang, Infrastructure Division, CWRD Team leader H. Hong, Financial Analysis Specialist, CWRD Team members L. Blanchetti-Revelli, Social Development Specialist, CWRD R. Ishenaliev, Transport Specialist, CWRD M. Kunzer, Environment Specialist, CWRD R. Sadykov, Project Implementation Officer, CWRD I. INTRODUCTION 1. During the 2007 Country Operations Business Plan Mission for 2008–2010, the Government of Tajikistan (the Government) requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for technical assistance (TA) for the preparation of the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Transport Corridor III (Dushanbe–Uzbekistan Border Road) Project. The TA Fact-Finding Mission visited Tajikistan on 8–11 February 2008 and reached understanding with the Government on the impact, outcome, outputs, costs, financing and implementation arrangements, and terms of reference for the TA.1 The TA design and monitoring framework is in Appendix 1. II. ISSUES 2. Inherent Regional Challenges in the Transport Sector. Central Asia is landlocked. The demise of the former Soviet Union in 1991 disrupted the conventional flow of trade, transport, and transit connections. The once-integrated road network system became fragmented and continued to deteriorate. Closer cross-border coordination and economic integration is further necessitated by the highly skewed natural resource endowments and growing demand. The challenges and opportunities facing the transport sector in the Central Asian countries are (i) fragmented regional road transport connections, (ii) aging infrastructure, (iii) outdated border facilities and equipment, and (iv) inefficiencies in border crossing due to bureaucratic procedures and inconsistent border policies and regulations. Restoring regional transport links will create opportunities for rapid economic growth and sustainable poverty reduction. The countries’ efforts have often been stymied by the shortage of investment and maintenance funds because of insufficient earmarking, weak institutions, and limited human resource capacity. 3. Limited Economic Opportunities. Mountainous and poor, Tajikistan is prone to insular growth with only a small domestic market and limited economic opportunities. The 5-year civil war, which ended in 1997, further isolated the country and led to sluggish economic growth, dropping Tajikistan behind its neighbors. Tajikistan has since achieved macroeconomic growth and stability with an economic structure highly dependent on remittances and international trade, with exports accounting for about 54% of gross domestic product (GDP) and imports about 70% of GDP in 2006. Empirically, an outward-oriented economic expansion is more effective for small and less developed economies. Regional cooperation on trade policy, and trade and transport facilitation signifies ADB’s ongoing CAREC 2 initiative. CAREC strategy renders positive economic ramifications for Tajikistan, which is strategically located to provide the essential transit needs of fast-growing neighbors like the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and Middle East countries. Revamping the existing integrated road network will spur the country’s intra- and interregional trade potential paving the way for flexible labor mobility and capital flow, export diversification, and enlarged production and income base. 4. Logistic Constraints. Transport accessibility is positively correlated to social and economic development. At over 27% of GDP,3 Tajikistan trade is burdened with one of the highest transport and logistics costs in the world. Since its mountainous landscape limits wider rail network, roads are, by far, the most dominant mode of transport in Tajikistan, carrying 90% 1 The technical assistance (TA) first appeared in ADB Business Opportunities on 7 March 2008. 2 ADB began the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) program in 1997 with Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, the People’s Republic of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan to ease the bottlenecks in regional trade and transport development. 3 Ojala, Kitain, Touboul. 2004. Tajikistan Trade Diagnostic Study, Transportation and Trade Facilitation. Final Report. 2 of passengers and 64% of cargo transport. Despite 0.1 kilometer (km) per km2 supply of roads and 2.3 km per 1,000 people accessibility to road network, the share of road freight transport hardly account for 10% of import and export.4 Poor infrastructure, and inconsistent restrictions and impositions of government rules at border crossings discourage efficient utilization of roads in cross-border trade. Efficient logistics are further hampered by the irregular distribution of road network, adding to poverty and income disparity among geographical regions. 5. Weak Road Management. National road management and planning is centralized at the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) responsible for 13,700 km of roads. Maintenance backlogs have accelerated deterioration of asphalt roads: around 48% of national roads are in poor condition and 32% very poor.5 Outdated road design standards and excess vehicle weight have increased pavement damages since most of the roads were designed and built to carry an axle load of 6 metric tons and are simply unfit to carry trucks with axle loads of more than 10 metric tons, now common in Tajikistan. About 30% of the bridges do not meet the load-carrying requirements and 7% are estimated to be in critical condition. 6. Missing Road Link. Route M-41 connecting Bishkek-Dushanbe-Termez is an international road and is part of two international corridors, European corridor E60 and Asian Highway 65. Various studies and reports by ADB6 and the Government confirm the strategic economic significance of the Dushanbe–Tursunzade–Uzbekistan border 7 road and the Tajikistan–Uzbekistan customs border post (Bratstvo). The project road is the main highway of Tajikistan linking Dushanbe and the district centers in Gissar valley to Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan. It is the missing link in the rehabilitation of the Tajik segment of the CAREC Transport Corridor III.8 A two-lane carriageway with a total length of about 66 km passing through settlements and cultivated land, the road bears a heavy volume of inter-farm transport of industrial and agricultural enterprises. It passes by Tursunzade, a major industrial city with an aluminum smelter, Central Asia’s largest, which accounts for a large proportion of Tajikistan’s imports and exports. Traffic is heavy near the Dushanbe exit, at about 8,000 vehicles per day (vpd), but decreases to about 2,500 vpd in Tursunzade. The estimated through traffic on the entire road is 4,500 vpd. The pavement is in poor condition, accruing economic costs of road users, contributing to underutilization of road for trade and commerce, and resulting in reduced level of mobility and access. Road haulage could also complement the existing transport mode in case of massive rail failure. From Tursunzade to Bratstvo border post, traffic volumes are lower, reflecting weak bilateral relations, customs cooperation, and border post conditions. The 4 ADB. 2005. Technical Assistance for Facilitation of Transport Cooperation among Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Countries (Phase 1). Manila (TA 6294-REG, Final Report). 5 ADB. 1999. Technical Assistance to the Republic of Tajikistan for Preparing the Road Rehabilitation, Manila (TA 3168-TAJ, Final Report). 6 ADB. 2007. Technical Assistance to the Republic of Tajikistan for the Transport Sector Master Plan. Manila (TA 4926-TAJ); and ADB. 2005. Technical Assistance for Facilitation of Transport Cooperation among Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Countries (Phase 1). Manila (TA 6294-REG). 7 The Government’s three priority roads for rehabilitation are: (i) Dushanbe–Tursunzade–Uzbekistan border road, (ii) Guliston–Pianj road, and (iii) Bekabad–Kanibadam–Batken road. 8 ADB has assisted CAREC Transport Corridor III through (i) ADB. 2003. Report and Recommendation of

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us