39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Rules and Regulations reaction irreversibility or by formation polarography or square-wave (3) Irving, H., “The Stability of Metal of two or more complex species in polarography). Complexes and Their Measurement equilibrium with each other. In this last (3) Interpretation and evaluation of Polarographically," Advances ih case it is necessary to apply the method resu lts, (i) Stability constants Polarography Proceedings of the 2nd by De Ford and Hume paragraph (d) (8) determined for a new substance can be International Congress, Ed. I.S. of this section to calculate stepwise compared with literature values for Langmuir (Pergamon Press, 1960). formation constants. standard substances (see Reference (4) Perrin, D.D., Dempsey, B., B u ffe r (2) Test report, (i) The test report substances, above) and used therefore for pH and Metal Ion Controls. should list for each metal ion to evaluate the strength of its (Chapman and Hall: London, 1974). investigated the half-wave potential complexing ability. (5) “Stability Constants of Metal-ion Complexes,” Part B, Organic Ligands, Ei /2 , co-ordination number and overall (ii) The system is physically stability constant. Compiled by D.D. Perrin, IUPAC meaningful if (A) the value of the Publication on Chemical Data Series, stability constant is positive and (B) the (ii) In addition, the following should No. 22 (Pergamon Press, 1979) also be reported: standard error is less than the constant (6) Grabaric, B., Tkalcec, M., Piljac, L, (A) Type of polarisable micro­ (the t-test should be used as a criterion). Filipovic, I., Simeon, V., “Numerical electrode, the reference electrode and, in (iii) If data are not significant, it is Evaluation of Complex Stability the case of the dropping mercury necessary to use methods based on Constants from Polarographic Data for electrode, the flow rate in mg/sec and different physicochemical principles, Quasi-Reversible Processes,” A na ly tica drop time. such as spectrophotometry or nuclear Chimica Acta 74\ 147, (1975). (B) IR correction (if applied). magnetic resonance spectrometry. (7) Piljac, I., Grabaric, B., Filipovic, I., (C) Maxima suppressors (if used). (d) Literature references. For “Improved Technique for Determination (D) Supporting electrolyte. additional background information on of Stability Constants by Polarographic (E) Buffer. this test guideline the following Method,” Journal of Electroanalytical (F) Temperature of measurement. references should be consulted: Chemistry Interfacial Electrochemistry, (G) Total ionic strength. (1) Vogel, A.I., Basset, J. V o gel's 42:433 (1973). (H) Technique applied (pilot ion, Textbook of Qualitative Inorganic (8) De Ford, D.D., Hume, D.N., “The standard addition, or other). A n a ly sis. Chapter XIX, 4th Ed. (Wiley: Determination of Consecutive Formation (I) Technical difficulties encountered. New York, 1978). Constants of Complex Ions from (J) Estimate of accuracy. (2) Crow, D.R., Westwood, J.V., “The Polarographic Data,” A m erica n (K) Polarographic technique employed Study of Complexed Metal Ions by Chemical Society Journal, 75:5321 (1951). (e.g., DC-, AC, polarography, single Polarographic Methods", Q ua rterly [FR Doc. 85-23077 Filed 9-26-85; 8:45 am] sweep polarography, radio frequency R ev iew 19: 51 (1965). BILLING CODE 6560-50-M Friday September 27, 1985 Part Itl Department of Labor Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division Minimum Wages for Federal and Federally Assisted Construction; General Wage Determination Decisions; Notice 39518 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR General wage determination decisions be used in accordance with the are effective from their date of provisions of 29 CFR Parts 1 and 5. Employment Standards publication in the Federal Register Any person, organization, or Administration, Wage and Hour without limitation as to time and are to governmental agency having an interest Division be used in accordance with the in the wages determined as prevailing is provisions of 29 CFR Parts 1 and 5. encouraged to submit wage rate Minimum Wages for Federal and Accordingly, the applicable decision information for consideration by the Federally Assisted Construction; together with any modifications issued Department. Further information and General Wage Determination subsequent to its publication date shall self-explanatory forms for the purpose Decisions be made a part of every contract for of submitting this data may be obtained General wage determination decisions performance of the described work by writing to the U.S. Department of of the Secretary of Labor specify, in within the geographic area indicated as Labor, Employment Standards accordance with applicable law and on required by an applicable Federal Administration, Wage and Hour the basis of information available to the prevailing wage law and 29 CFR Part 5. Division, Office of Program Operations, Department of Labor from its study of The wage rates contained therein shall Division of Wage Determinations, local wage conditions and from other be the minimum paid under such Washington, D.C. 20210. The cause for sources, the basic hourly wage rates and contract by contractors and . not utilizing the rulemaking procedures fringe benefit payments which are subcontractors on the work. prescribed in 5 U.S.C. 553 has been set determined to be prevailing for the Modifications and Supersedeas forth in the original General described classes of laborers and Decisions to .General Wage Determination Decision. mechanics employed on construction Determination Decisions Modification to General Wage projects of the character and in the Determination Decisions localities specified therein. Modifications and supersedeas The determinations in these decisions decisions to general wage determination The numbers of the decisions being of such prevailing rates and fringe decisions are based upon information modified and their dates of publication benefits have been made by authority of obtained concerning changes in in the Federal Register are listed with the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the prevailing hourly wage rates and fringe each State. provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act of benefit payments since the decisions were issued. March 3,1931, as amended (46 Stat. Arkansas: AR84-4090.............. Jan. 13, 1984. 1494, as amended 40 U.S.C. 276a) and of The determinations of prevailing rates and fringe benefits made in the California: CA85-5035............. Sept. 6,1985. other Federal statutes referred to in 29 Iowa: CFR 5.1 (including the statutes listed at modifications and supersedeas IA84-4031............... ............ May 11, 1984. 36 FR 306 (1970) following Secretary of decisions have been made by authority IA84-4109............................ Dec. 21, 1984. Labor’s Order No. 24-70) containing of the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the LA84-4042........................... June 15, 1984. provisions for the payment of wages provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act of Kansas: which are dependent upon March 3,1931, as amended (46 Stat. KS84-4052..;....................... Aug. 24, 1984. determination by the Secretary of Labor 1494, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 276a) and of KS84-4053........................... Do. under the Davis-Bacon Act; and other Federal statutes referred to in 29 KS84-4107.......................... Dec. 14, 1984. pursuant to the provisions of part 1 of CFR 5.1 (including the statutes listed at New Jersey: 36 FR 306 (1970) following Secretary of NJ85-3031............................ Aug. 2, 1985. subtitle A of title 29 of Code of Federal NJ85-3032................;.......... July 19, 1985. Regulations Procedure for Labor’s Order No. 24-70) containing New Mexico: NM85-4014...... June 14,1985. Predetermination of Wage Rates, 48 FR provisions for the payment of wages Nevada: NV84-5014................. June 8,1984. 19533 (1983) and of Secretary of Labor’s which are dependent upon New York: NY85-3039............. July 26,1985. Orders »-83, 48 FR 35736 (1983), and 6- determination by the Secretary of Labor 84, 49 FR 32473 (1984$i The prevailing under the Davis-Bacon Act; and rates and fringe benefits determined in pursuant to the provisions of Part 1 of Subtitle A of Title 29 of Code of Federal Supersedeas Decision to General Wage these decisions shall, in accordance Determination Decisions with the provisions of the foregoing Regulations Procedure for statutes, constitute the minimum wages Predetermination of Wage Rates, 48 FR The numbers of the decisions being payable on Federal and federally 19533 (1983) and of Secretary of Labor’s modified and their dates of publication assisted construction projects to Order 6-84, 49 FR 32473 (1984). The in the Federal Register are listed with laborers and mechanics of the specified prevailing rates and fringe benefits each State. Supersedeas decision classes engaged on contract work of the determined in foregoing general wage numbers are in parentheses following character and in the localities described determination decisions, as hereby the numbers of the decisions being therein. modified, and/or superseded shall, in superseded. Good cause is hereby found for not accordance with the provisions of the utilizing notice and public procedure foregoing statutes, constitute the Iowa: IA82-4044 (IA85- Aug. 27, 1982. thereon prior to the issuance of these minimum wages payable on Federal and 4040). determinations as prescribed in 5 U.S.C. federally assisted construction