Question 3b. If you ticked no; are there any other ways in which the District could be divided which would help plan the District for the next 20 years? Customer Comment Reference NameReference Agent 00004Bishops Waltham Parish 00004/00001/009 Council Bishops Waltham and Wickham should not be in the PUSH area. 00013Denmead Parish Council 00013/00001/010 The middle division could be more accurately renamed "Alresford and the northern parishes" 00015Durley Parish Council 00015/00001/002 Winchester town; market towns and larger villages; rural areas and smaller villages. 00015Durley Parish Council 00015/00002/010 Winchester Town; market towns and larger villages; rural areas and smaller villages. 00016Hambledon Parish 00016/00001/011 Council - Winchester Town, Market Towns and the rural area.- 'PUSH' Partnership of Urban South Hampshire.- South Downs National Park (to be designated) and AONB areas.The Southern Parishes are not naturally part of the PUSH area except perhaps Whiteley. The others, including Denmead, form the rural hinterland, and should not be considered urban for planning purposes. They should be excluded from the PUSH area. Any development in these villages would have a negative impact on the Designated South Downs National Park immediately to the North. 00043Wonston Parish Council 00043/00001/010 The rural areas should be treated as a separate entity. There is, without doubt, a more significant difference between life in a market town and life in a village or farming community than there is between life in Winchester City and life in a market town. This is particularly so with the respect to the first three "broad considerations" on pg22 of the document. Summaries of responses to Core Strategy Issues and Options (October 2008) 1 Question 3b. If you ticked no; are there any other ways in which the District could be divided which would help plan the District for the next 20 years? Customer Comment Reference NameReference Agent 00089Hampshire County 00089/00001/006 Council HCC would like to see reference to a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) undertaken/ commissioned by the Council. It is considered that the provision of this information will assist in demonstrating the deliverability of the Core Strategy and the level of reliance the Council will be placing on Brownfield Land, and in turn, the Council's likely future requirement for Greenfield development over the plan period. 00113Alresford Society 00113/00001/011 This division ignores a number of significant factors: The proposed National Park that isolates some of the District. Also the equilvalent "PUSH" area centred on Basingstoke and Deane that will create pressures in the North-East of the District unfortunately split between East Hants, Basingstoke and Winchester. 00270Ms Meriel Walton 00270/00001/012 Limited development of all settlements. Results in over focus of expansion of towns and under focus on villages. 00270Ms Meriel Walton 00270/00002/012 Limited development of all settlements. 00276Mr R I L Howland 00276/00002/011 The South East Plan's emphasis on existing urban areas is misguided and undemocratic. A flexible approach is needed.The old Barton Stacey camp is a good site. The fact that it straddles a boundary of two authorities is irrelevant,. 00280Mrs Cheryl Berry 00280/00002/011 1. Winchester Town and market towns and rural areas (grouped together)2. PUSH area3. South Downs national park 00320Ms R Wetherill 00320/00002/012 I'd like to know why a majpr sustainable market town based on Micheldever is not on the agenda This will allow consideration of how the objective to protect Winchester is best served. Summaries of responses to Core Strategy Issues and Options (October 2008) 2 Question 3b. If you ticked no; are there any other ways in which the District could be divided which would help plan the District for the next 20 years? Customer Comment Reference NameReference Agent 00415Ms Laura Clarke 00415/00002/008 Whether or not this is an appropriate will be measured by the effectiveness of the decisions made in respect of them. If the process is reduced to a decision about numbers then the division doesn't matter - it's about the most appropriate developments in the most appropriate place, not how that place has been labelled. 00556Mr A Gossling 00556/00002/010 The 3 areas should be:1. Winchester town and market towns and rural areas 2. PUSH area 3. South Downs and AONB National park 00783Mr And Mrs CW And JR 00783/00003/005 Eames More specific to Winchester City, Alresford, Bishops Waltham, Wickham and surrounding villages for which overwhelming generalisations will not necessarily be appropriate. 00784Mr D J Barfield 00784/00002/008 It is ridiculous to plan to build on Greenfield when an unknown quantity of Brownfield sites such as barracks, prisons will become available over the next decade or so. 00852Ms Norma C Goodwin 00852/00002/008 I agree this is an appropriate way to sub-divide the district. 01024Mrs S Dix 01024/00001/018 Fewer houses to be built in the next 20 years. Which would lead to more green land being left as it is instead of cramming houses on every possible bit of land. 01083Ms Elizabeth Robinson 01083/00002/011 I live in Waltham Chase and do not want this area to be included in PUSH. How many people in this area want to be more urban If we wanted to live in a town we would do. I think its fine to split between Winchester town and the market towns/ rural area. I object most strongly to being dumped into 'urban south Hampshire' as no doubt we will end up with even more houses and accompanying problems but none of the amenities that should benefit urban areas. Summaries of responses to Core Strategy Issues and Options (October 2008) 3 Question 3b. If you ticked no; are there any other ways in which the District could be divided which would help plan the District for the next 20 years? Customer Comment Reference NameReference Agent 01125Mr Denise Caws 01125/00001/011 The division means that there a few settlements, such as Wickham, that are categorised as both 'Key Hubs' within 'market towns and the rural area' AND 'southern fringe within PUSH boundary'. Development for these places can be considered under both classifications. They are therefore doubly vulnerable. How can settlement be both within the 'market town and rural area' and the urban area of the 'PUSH'? 01243Ms Serita Campbell 01243/00002/003 It is not appropriate to convert the green areas surrounding small villages such as Wickham, Soberton, Swanmore, Shirrell heath, as will be detrimental to the areas and will lose the village identities. It is more appropriate to build on areas that are already built on, such as industrial sites. 01265Ms N A Holladay 01265/00002/011 Winchester TownRural areas and villagesBusiness enterprise zonesRetail centresUrban centres 01297Ms Ann Sadler Forster 01297/00002/009 There are many differences within e.g.: market towns to make keeping them together artificial also the way they are labelled. i.e. Denmead should be included as a market town, surely it depends on population and existing services and whether the population see themselves as town and village. 01316Mr And Mrs Paul And 01316/00002/010 Valerie Shuttleworth The historic centres of Bishops Waltham and Wickham should be part of the second group (market towns and rural area) and Whiteley and Knowle, as new developments, should belong to the third group. 01460Mr Michael John Bennett 01460/00002/009 I cannot see an Option 1 or 2 in the question above.There is a serious question about the status of Wickham versus Denmead. Summaries of responses to Core Strategy Issues and Options (October 2008) 4 Question 3b. If you ticked no; are there any other ways in which the District could be divided which would help plan the District for the next 20 years? Customer Comment Reference NameReference Agent 01501Revd David Simpson 01501/00005/011 It is the invidious extension of urban areas that I object to. It seems that the interests of local residents on the southern perimeter of the district are on Winchester's peripheral vision. It seems that since the North Fareham SDA relates to land that falls within the area of Fareham Borough Council the residents of Knowle Village are disenfranchised - we have no democratic rights in the Borough and the boundary is an arbitrary one. In view of this, Winchester owes it to residents in the southern part of the district to argue a robust case for the protection of our rural environment. 01923Captain John Ellis 01923/00001/009 Division is inappropriate and misleading as a total solution needs to be found. Solutions for one area/sub-division may cause increased problems for another. A total and balanced solution is needed - this may well involve all of Hampshire (And adjacent counties) 01926Mrs Fiona Turner 01926/00001/009 PUSH is an inappropriate name for the southern part A the district it conjures up memories of "Silent City" 01931Mr Micheal Cunliffe 01931/00002/009 Market Towns (key hubs and local hubs) should be separated from 'Rural Area'. This will enable separate policies to be applied to different needs. 01937Mrs Lesley Hallett 01937/00001/009 North/ South split.Otherwise confusion as to a parish in 2 or 3 or both. 01941Dr Richard Hallett 01941/00001/009 Should be Northern and Southern sectors. As above several planes fit into 2 sectors. 01946Mrs Margaret Raffle 01946/00001/010 Denmead should be within the Meon Valley - Rural Area 01948Mr Neil Lander-Brinkley 01948/00001/009 But the middle market towns is more accurately named - Alresford and the northern parishes Summaries of responses to Core Strategy Issues and Options (October 2008) 5 Question 3b.