Fluorescence Microscopy for TB Testing

Fluorescence Microscopy for TB Testing

Fluorescence Microscopy for TB Testing Dr. Lipton Consultant/Inventor Mycobacteria tuberculosis Epidemiology & Life Cycle – Many millions of Active TB infections worldwide – Spread by droplet infection – Affects: • Stressed, prisoners • Malnourished- the world’s poor • Non-healthy, drug abusers, HIV • Institutionalized patients 2 World TB Incidence World TB incidence. Cases per 100,000 red => 300 orange = 200–300 yellow = 100–200 Delegates green = 50–100 at this blue =< 50 meeting grey =n/a Mycobacteria tuberculosis • Acute Disease • Pulmonary Disease • Extra-pulmonary Disease – Spinal Fluid – Brain → Meningitis – Lymph Nodes – GI and GU – Skeletal, Potts disease 4 Mycobacteria tuberculosis Pathology Most patients have: • Hemoptysis • Productive cough • Fever • Weight loss 5 Mycobacteria tuberculosis Pathology Quiescent Disease Histiocytic phagocytosis 6 Mycobacteria groups Runyon Groups – M. tuberculosis – M. bovis I Slow-growing M. kansasii photochromogens M. marinum II Slow-growing M. scrofulaceum scotochromogens III Slow-growing non- M. avium-intracellulare photochromogens M. xenopi IV Rapid-growing M. fortuitum (<1 week) 7 Processing Specimens Mycobacteria Reagents - TB Digestion Fluid SPUTUM DIGESTION SMEAR CULTURE Methods for TB diagnosis 1. Antibody 2. Antigen 3. PCR 4. Skin testing 5. Culture 6. Microscopy 9 TB Antibody detection Advantages • Rapid assays • Easy to use Disadvantages • Antigens may vary from different suppliers • Lot to lot variability • Specificity poor - <40% of TB detected • May be expensive 10 TB Antigen detection Advantages • Simpler to detect Disadvantages • Machinery may be needed • May be costly • Unknown data on specificity and sensitivity 11 TB PCR detection Advantages – Highly specific- good for epidemiology – Rapid turnaround time (~2.5-7 hours) Disadvantages – Expensive – Requires highly trained personnel – Requires special space for processing 12 TB skin testing Advantages • 65% sensitivity with a 96% specificity • Easy to read • Inexpensive Disadvantages • May not be sufficiently sensitive • Needs trained personnel • Cannot be used as epidemiological tool • Takes up to a week to read. • Hard to read on dark skin 13 TB culture detection Advantages • Accurate • Less expensive than newer techniques Disadvantages • slow to medium slow (7-15 days) • Education needed • Cumbersome • Further tests needed for confirmation Identification - Mycobacteria Biochemical Tests Examples • Catalase Test • Tellurite Reduction Test • Tween 80 Hydrolysis • Urease Test … etc. 15 Types of microscopy • Light Microscopy • Electron Microscopy • Fluorescent Microscopy Mycobacteria Stains– LIGHT MICROSCOPY Carbol Fuchsin • Ziehl Neelson Acid Fast Stain • Kinyoun Stain 17 Mycobacteria Stains LIGHT MICROSCOPY Advantages • Easy to perform • Easy to read • Expensive equipment not needed Disadvantages – Not specific – Not sensitive – Messy – Hard to see organisms in weak infection – Some expertise to perform 18 Mycobacteria Stains- Fluorescent Stains Fluorochromes • AcriFluor- Acridine orange • Auramine Rhodamine - Auramine O & Rhodamine • Modified Auramine O – Auramine O Principle of fluorescence step 1 • Energy is absorbed by the atom which becomes excited Principle of fluorescence step 2 • The electron jumps to a higher energy level Principle of fluorescence step 3 • Soon the electron drops back to ground state • Emitting a photon or packet of light Auramine O Advantages • Fast • Easy to perform 1 minute • Specific for Mycobacteria • Easy to read • Inexpensive Disadvantages • UV Microscope necessary • unfamiliarity 1 minute 23 QBC ParaLens 24 Principle of Diode F.A.S.T. Auramine O TB Stain 26 Study #1 Study: Comparison of 3 commercially Auramine O stains Results: - 185 patients – 13(7%) were positive - F.A.S.T. Auramine O was more sensitive. (Weak positives seen) - F.A.S.T. Auramine O was more cost effective. - Brighter fluorescence observed with F.A.S.T. Auramine O. - It took less time to perform F.A.S.T. Auramine O. - presentation at ASM nat. meeting C-324, 2006 Study #1 Visual Comparison MCC QBC BD REMEL Study #2 Study: Comparison between two Auramine O Stains Results: Both had similar sensitivity and specificity. F.A.S.T. Auramine O gave less background fluorescence, less expensive, and faster to perform J.Clin.Micro.:47:4,2009. EZ Smear Advantages Specimen • Ease of use STAIN STAIN • Portability • Cost • Ease of reading Add Water • Little experience necessary Mix Disadvantages • Slides capable of breaking Wash • Fluorescent microscope necessary Add 2 drops EZ Smear TB Control Slide Advantages • Standardizes staining procedure • Standardizes operator parameters • Meets governmental regulations Disadvantages • Adds to the cost of each assay • Additional slide to read 32 Patient Slide The end … but really the beginning! 34 .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    34 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us