Preferential Edge Habitat Colonization by a Specialist Weevil, Rhinoncomimus Latipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Preferential Edge Habitat Colonization by a Specialist Weevil, Rhinoncomimus Latipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

BEHAVIOR Preferential Edge Habitat Colonization by a Specialist Weevil, Rhinoncomimus latipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) 1,2* 3* 4 1 J. A. HOUGH-GOLDSTEIN, E. LAKE, V. D’AMICO, AND S. H. BERG Environ. Entomol. 41(6): 1466Ð1473 (2012); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN12090 ABSTRACT Understanding the behavioral basis of dispersal and colonization is critical in biological control systems, where success of a natural enemy depends in part on its ability to Þnd and move to new host patches. We studied behavior of the specialist weevil Rhinoncomimus latipes Korotyaev, a biological control agent of mile-a-minute weed, Persicaria perfoliata (L.) H. Gross, by releasing weevils at the forest edge and monitoring their colonization of potted host plants arrayed along the edge, out into the open Þeld, and into the forest. Both distance from the release cage and habitat where plants were located affected colonization, with more than twice as many weevils found on plants at 2 m than at 6 or 14 m; at 14 m, 6Ð8 times as many weevils colonized plants along the forest edge compared with plants in the open Þeld or within the forest. In a second experiment, weevils that were released in an open Þeld 12 m from the forest edge initially ßew in all directions, but again ultimately colonized more plants at the edge than out in the open Þeld. This species may be adapted to seek host plants at the forest edge, because P. perfoliata generally is found in riparian corridors in its native range and along forest edges in North America. Results suggest that R. latipes will move successfully to new P. perfoliata patches along wooded edges, but may not readily locate isolated patches in the open or those embedded in forests. KEY WORDS dispersal, orientation, biocontrol, Rhinoncomimus latipes, Persicaria perfoliata Dispersal of individual herbivores from one habitat Curculionidae), which was introduced into North patch to another has consequences, not only for in- America in 2004 for biological control of the invasive dividual Þtness, but also for population and commu- plant, mile-a-minute weed [Persicaria perfoliata (L.) nity dynamics (Grevstad and Herzig 1997, Tilman and H. Gross (Polygonaceae); Colpetzer et al. 2004; Kareiva 1997, Cronin 2003, Bowler and Benton 2005, Hough-Goldstein et al. 2009, 2012; Lake et al. 2011)]. Da´valos and Blossey 2011). Dispersal behavior can be Previous work on R. latipes dispersal and host-Þnding divided into three phases (Bowler and Benton 2005): has shown that these small (Ϸ2 mm long) weevils are the decision to leave the current patch, movement able to navigate obstacles in the landscape including between patches, and the decision to enter and remain streams, tree lines, and hayÞelds, locating both large on a new patch once one has been found. A greater mile-a-minute infestations and isolated patches (Lake understanding of the behavioral basis of dispersal et al. 2011). Weevils dispersed at an average rate of within an insectÐplant system will improve our ability 1.5Ð2.9 m/wk after initial release in mostly contiguous to predict and possibly inßuence community dynam- patches of mile-a-minute (Lake et al. 2011) and at 4.3 ics. Such understanding is critical in biological control km/yr by 1Ð3 yr after release in the broader landscape systems, where success of a natural enemy depends on (Hough-Goldstein et al. 2009). Within an experimen- establishment, impact on the target host before dis- tal array, weevils readily found P. perfoliata plants in persal, and ability to move through a varied landscape a matrix of bare ground and nonhost plants (Frye et and locate and colonize host patches interspersed in al. 2010), with 6% of weevils locating P. perfoliata the nonhost matrix. plants within 3 h, and 20% by 2 d after release. Al- Here we explore the behavior of the specialist wee- though not the focus of the experiment, the study by vil, Rhinoncomimus latipes Korotyaev (Coleoptera: Frye et al. (2010) also showed that R. latipes primarily disperses during daylight hours. We know that this insect is highly capable of Þnding 1 Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of its host, but do not know the relative importance of Delaware, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716. 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. walking versus ßight, whether weevils walk or ßy in a 3 USDAÐARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3225 College speciÞc direction (e.g., compass direction, relative to Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314. presence of host plants, relative to matrix habitat, up 4 US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Department of or downwind, or toward or away from the sun); or the Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, 531 S. College Ave., Newark, DE 19716. importance in host-Þnding of navigation cues or re- * Hough-Goldstein and Lake contributed equally to this work. luctance of the insect to enter certain habitats. This 0046-225X/12/1466Ð1473$04.00/0 ᭧ 2012 Entomological Society of America December 2012 HOUGH-GOLDSTEIN ET AL.: EDGE COLONIZATION BY R. latipes 1467 Table 1. Sites where weevils were released and the numbers of weevils observed flying in different directions, 2011 Number of weevils observed Coordinates of Direction of Morning sun Wind direction Release site ßying toward: Total release site open Þeld on cage (from, to)a Left Open Right Forest Ecology Woods 39Њ 39Ј51Љ N East Full sun Right, left 46 59 49 2 156 75Њ 44Ј35Љ W (N-S) Webb Farm 39Њ 40Ј24Љ N Northeast Sun, then shade Right, forest 26 8 4 0 38 75Њ 44Ј10Љ W (N-S) Rittenhouse 39Њ 39Ј28Љ N Northwest Shade, then sun Left, forest 4 11 1 1 17 75Њ 45Ј37Љ W (NE-SW) Laird 39Њ 41Ј30Љ N Southeast Shade Forest, left 0 1 1 0 2 75Њ 45Ј31Љ W (N-S) Coverdale 39Њ 41Ј42Љ N Southwest Shade Left, right 0 0 0 0 0 75Њ 44Ј07Љ W (NW-SE) Total 76 79 55 3 213 a Left and right when facing the forest from the open Þeld. insect is positively phototactic (Smith and Hough- cm in length) wrapped around the dowel and hooked Goldstein 2012) and generally is found in greater into small holes drilled in the sides of the bucket. The abundance on plants growing in sun than in shade top of each fabric cone was stapled to the top of the (Hough-Goldstein and LaCoss 2012). Full sun is also dowel, and secured by a Velcro tie wrapped around the most favorable condition for host plant growth and the top of the dowel, closing off the opening. White reproduction (Hough-Goldstein 2008). sand was poured around the empty pot, up to the level In this experiment we conducted replicated re- of the top of the pot. A single potted P. perfoliata plant, leases of large numbers of weevils from the edge of Ϸ4 wk old, was placed in the empty pot in each release woodlots at Þve sites, observing the insectsÕ behavior cage, and the weevils were shaken and brushed onto as they initially dispersed by ßight, and then tracking the plants. The next day, on 4 June, each of these plants their arrival at potted host plants arrayed along the was cut at its base, to initiate desiccation so deterio- wooded edge, out into the open Þeld, and into the rating host plant quality would encourage dispersal at forest. The objectives were, Þrst, to determine if there the time of Þeld release. The cages were kept in the was directionality to R. latipes initial dispersal, with laboratory next to a window until 6 June, when they ßight rather than walking encouraged by forcing wee- were taken out to the Þeld for release. vils to climb a vertical structure before dispersing; and Each cage was taken to a wooded edge of one of Þve second, to determine the extent of weevil colonization fragmented forest sites in Newark, DE. The Þve sites of host plants located at different distances and within varied in the compass orientation of the edge relative three habitat types: the forest edge, open Þeld, and to the forest, sun exposure in the morning, and pre- forest interior. A follow-up study tracked weevil col- dominant wind direction relative to the edge (Table onization of plants in the forest edge habitat versus the 1). The distance between release sites ranged from 0.8 open Þeld when weevils were released in the open to 3.8 km. Vegetation in the open Þeld consisted of Þeld adjacent to a forest edge. mowed grass except for the Ecology Woods, which was bordered by dense tall forbs, and the Rittenhouse site, which had sparse tall grass and forbs. The Laird Materials and Methods site open area had mowed grass at 2 and 6 m and tall Five thousand weevils were sent by overnight cou- unmowed grass at 14 m. All Þve sites were free of P. rier from the Phillip Alampi BeneÞcial Insect Labo- perfoliata in the immediate vicinity of the experiment. ratory, Trenton, NJ, where R. latipes has been reared To assure that they were isolated from other weevil since 2004 (Palmer et al. 2008), arriving the morning populations, a sentinel mile-a-minute plant was placed of 3 June 2011. These weevils had been collected from at each release site on 2 June, collected on 3 June, and rearing containers between 23 May and 1 June, and checked for presence of weevils or feeding damage. held on P. perfoliata potted plants before shipping. All sentinel plants were free of weevil activity except One thousand weevils were placed in each of Þve for the plant at the Ecology Woods site, which had one white plastic 19-liter buckets with the center of the top weevil and minimal feeding damage on one terminal.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us