Is Press Freedom Being Eroded in Japan?

Is Press Freedom Being Eroded in Japan?

Volume 5 | Issue 3 | Article ID 2377 | Mar 01, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Is Press Freedom Being Eroded in Japan? David McNeill, Tony McNicol Is Press Freedom Being Eroded in Japan? said. “We will fight this.” He wasn’t to be released for another 192 days. Tony McNicol and David McNeill Prosecutors accused the publisher of defaming Two recent libel cases have led to concerns executives of Aruze Corp., a pachinko gambling that the freedom of Japanese journalists to machine and slot machine maker, with investigate and, if necessary criticize the allegations of tax evasion and unethical powerful is under attack. Both involve marginal business practices. They also accused him of publications that make a living tackling “taboo” defaming ex-employees of the Hanshin Tigers subjects and which have suffered serious legal baseball team through allegations that a former repercussions as a result. The mainstream scout for the team was murdered. Prosecutors media in Japan has so far declined to discuss cited books published by Rokusaisha, the issues, still less to offer any expressions of information on their website, and their solidarity for their plight. The cases coincide quarterly magazine “Kami no Bakudan (“Paper with the publication of a report by Reporters Bomb”). Without Borders, which called the “steady erosion” of press freedom in Japan “alarming” and again criticized the stifling role of press clubs on reporting in the world’s second-largest economy. Imprisoned for libel Tony McNicol Publisher’s arrest and imprisonment for libel is ignored by the Japanese media. Publisher Matsuoka Toshiyasu first realized Kami no Bakudan something was up that July 2005 morning when he opened his Asahi Newspaper: “KobeRokusaisha’s flagship magazine had attempted prosecutors issue arrest warrant forto establish itself as a fearless outlet for the Rokusaisha publishing house president on stories other publications wouldn’t touch. suspicion of defamation.” Before long reporters Before Matsuoka’s arrest it covered a range of and TV crews had gathered outside his Kobe so-called “taboo” topics in Japan, like Johnny’s home and office. At 8 a.m. prosecutors arrived Jimusho entertainment agency, financial and he barely had time to make a comment to scandals involving the Mitsui Sumitomo bank, the media before being taken away to Kobe and reports on politician Abe Shinzo (now detention center. “This is a violation of the 21st Japan’s Prime Minister). It had, however, paid (free speech) clause of the constitution,” he particular attention to Aruze Corp, with articles 1 5 | 3 | 0 APJ | JF and books on the company by Rokusaisha unequivocal about the implications of the president Matsuoka. The publisher was already arrest. “If we casually permit a member of the being sued by Aruze for libel at the time of his media to be arrested on suspicion of arrest. defamation,” he said, “it is the same as if freedom of speech had died.” “I had been sued before, but I wasn’t expecting to be arrested,” said Matsuoka. He pointed out Perhaps Kami no Bakudan, a small circulation that criminal arrest for libel was almost magazine in Kansai far from the Tokyo based unprecedented in Japan, never mind the 192 media, was unlikely ever to garner much days he spent in jail before his case came to support. The magazine had pledged to continue court. Last July the publisher was issued a the work of Japan’s most daring scandal suspended sentence of one year and two magazine Uwasa no Shinso, but it had failed to months imprisonment, which he is nowdraw anything like that publication’s appealing. readership. At its peak, Uwasa no Shinso’s circulation rivaled other weekly magazines. While the facts of the arrest were covered by Kami no Bakudan monthly sales were 25,000 most of Japan’s national newspapers, Japanese before the arrest, and half that now. journalists – with the exception of local Kobe media - showed little solidarity withAnd Kami no Bakudan’s murky image (even for Rokusaisha. Even Japan’s leading liberal daily, a muckraking weekly magazine) can’t have The Asahi Shimbun, effectively looked the other helped its cause. “Even if it is attacked, way. Ironically, an Asahi reporter interviewed Rokusaisha is the kind of company that other Matsuoka the day before he was taken into media won’t support,” said Yamaoka Shunsuke, custody, and reported the arrest before it even an investigative journalist and freelance happened. Kami no Bakudan editor Nakagawa contributor to the magazine, “It is considered a Motohiro suspects the newspaper used its scandal magazine . not a serious magazine.” contacts in the Kobe prosecutor’s office. “The He added that the publisher hasn’t established Asahi Shimbun reporters in the police press the friendly links with other media that Uwasa club knew more about what was happening no Shinso enjoyed. Many of that magazine’s than we did,” he said. scoops came via journalists in the mainstream media. The Chief Spokesman for Matsuoka’s support group, Hayakawa Yoshiteru, said he made “[Uwasa no Shinso] may have been a black repeated, unsuccessful attempts to stage press sheep, but it was still part of the herd,” agreed conferences: “I contacted the national media, Mark Schreiber, co-author of Tabloid Tokyo, a but the journalists who I spoke to said their collection of summarized and translated stories wouldn’t get published.” (When this articles from Japan’s weekly magazines. reporter pitched a story on Matsuoka’s arrest Rokusaisha, on the other hand, is on the fringes to a Japanese weekly magazine he occasionally of the media in more ways than one, he noted. writes for, he got a curt reply: “I don't have any “This is a Kansai (Western Japan) based interest in a story on him.”) publication with national circulation; that’s very rare.” Of the weeklies, only the Shukan Asahi weekly magazine offered robust support. In a two-page “I think this is par for the course,” said interview, Okadome Yasunori, the well known Schreiber. “In one form or another, these ex-editor of defunct scandal magazine Uwasa publications are constantly in trouble.” He no Shinso ("the truth behind the rumors"), was pointed out that the magazines rely on scandal- 2 5 | 3 | 0 APJ | JF seeking reports, often outrageous invasions of highly unusual decision to take Matsuoka into privacy, for the bread and butter of their custody has dark implications. Terasawa Yu, a business. To that extent, legal action comes freelance journalist who reports on the with the territory. Japanese police for weekly magazines pointed out that both Aruze Corp. and the Hanshin Nor does he believe that magazines like Uwasa Tigers baseball team employ ex police officers no Shinso and Kami no Bakudan are quite the in “amakudari” adviser positions. The colossal fearless taboo-breakers they make themselves 30 trillion yen pachinko gambling industry, out to be. “Some of [their journalists] take the technically illegal, is kept rolling through legal position that they are crusaders,” saidloopholes and the close cooperation of the Schreiber. “They make a show of being Japanese police. Terasawa suggested that the fearless, but they don’t have the time or the companies may have used their police contacts money to go out there and really dig. They are to engineer Matsuoka’s arrest. dependent on people dropping stuff in their laps. It is a forum for people who want to spill Matsuoka’s imprisonment has been an the beans.” exceptional case, but Terasawa points out that huge libel demands have already become a There were suspicions too that Rokusaisha is tried and tested tactic for companies who wish embroiled in a factional struggle within the to silence freelance journalists and small Pachinko industry. Unlike Uwasa no Shinso, publications. He himself was unsuccessfully who issued a wide-ranging assault on a sued by loan company Takefuji. “The spectrum of media taboos, Rokusaisha has companies don’t even need or expect to win,” concentrated on pachinko machine maker he said. “They just want to intimidate Aruze with four books and various magazine journalists.” articles. Asked flatly at the FCCJ press conference whether Rokusaisha had received Uwasa no Shinso editor Okadome said that that money from Sammy, Aruze’s pachinko industry libel payments have increased greatly in the rival, Matsuoka said no. But he also said he was last few years. Okadome was involved in surprised when Sammy pre-ordered 3,000 around 40 libel cases during 25 years at the copies of his first Aruze book’s 13,000 print- magazine, but he said payouts have grown 10 run. fold and that the most famous plaintiffs, notably TV personalities and politicians, get the most money. Music journalist Ugaya Hiro is the latest freelance journalist to feel the heat. He came to the FCCJ not long before Matsuoka to talk about the ¥50 million law suit he is fighting against Oricon, the company that publishes Japan’s pop-music charts (see related article by David McNeill). Ugaya is being sued over brief comments he made in a telephone interview questioning the accuracy of the charts. He was also at the FCCJ to hear Matsuoka speak and Rokusaisha books on Aruze during the Q&A he wryly asked the Rokusaisha editor for advice on defense against gangster Nevertheless, observers say that the police’s thugs. 3 5 | 3 | 0 APJ | JF Asano Kenichi, Professor of Journalism and call last year from monthly investigative Mass Communications at Doshisha University, magazine Cyzo, he could hardly have known said that both Ugaya’s and Matsuoka’s cases that his brief conversation with a harried editor were worrying signs for press freedom in would trigger a 50-million-yen lawsuit and Japan.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us