URBAN INNOVATIONS IN CURITIBA: A CASE STUDY Hanna-Ruth Gustafsson and Elizabeth Kelly Eugene & Carol Ludwig Center for Community and Economic Development With support from the Streicker Fund for Student Research Yale Law School June 2012 Hanna-Ruth Gustafsson: As a member of the Yale Law School class of 2012, Hanna served as a director of the YLS Community and Economic Development Clinic and an editor of the Yale Journal of International Law. Prior to attending law school, Hanna received a B.A. in History from Yale University and worked for the Urban Design Division of the New York City Department of Transportation. Starting in the fall, Hanna will be an associate at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP in New York City. Elizabeth Kelly: A member of the Yale Law School class of 2012, Elizabeth graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and received her MSc in Comparative Social Policy from the University of Oxford as a Rotary Foundation Ambassadorial and Clarendon Scholar. At Yale, Elizabeth further developed her longstanding commitment to social and economic justice as a student director of the YLS Community and Economic Development Clinic and through internships at the White House Domestic Policy Council, HUD General Counsel's office, and Southeastern Louisiana Legal Services' Housing Law Unit. Beginning in September, Elizabeth will serve as Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Streicker Fund for Student Research at Yale Law School. The Fund’s generous financial support made this report possible. The Eugene & Carol Ludwig Center for Community and Economic Development works at the intersection of law, policy, entrepreneurship, economics, and social innovation to research and design creative, testable, and scalable solutions to community development challenges at the local, national, and global levels. The viewpoints and opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and the Ludwig Center, and do not necessarily represent those of the Ludwig family. Copyright © 2012 Eugene and Carol Ludwig Center for Community & Economic Development. 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………....4 II. Urban Growth in Curitiba…………………………………………………….. 6 III. Curitiba’s Urban Planning Innovations………………………………………. 9 A. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)………………………………………………... 10 i. Bus Routes and Zoning..………………………………………… 11 ii. Transfer Terminals and Bus Stops………………………………. 13 iii. Fares and Fare Collection……………………………………….. 14 iv. Financing and Operations……………………………………….. 15 v. BRT Usage……………………………………………………….16 B. Parks System…………………..…………………………………………17 C. Recycling Program……………………………………………………….19 IV. Applicable Lessons………………………………………………………….. 21 A. Develop a BRT System…………………………………………………..22 B. Integrate Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning………24 C. Strategically Designate Park Land……………………………………….24 D. Implement Comprehensive Recycling Programs………………………...25 V. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………... 26 3 I. Introduction Across the globe, urban growth is occurring at an unprecedented rate and scale.1 In 2008, the percentage of the world population residing in cities reached 50 percent. By 2050, an estimated 70 percent of the global population will live in urban centers.2 Much of this growth is concentrated in “mega cities,” metropolises of over 10 million people.3 These mega cities are increasingly merging to form “mega regions,” defined as regional centers of interlinked economic and urban growth and often home to as many as 100 million people.4 Mega regions’ economic and cultural benefits are well documented.5 The world’ s forty-largest mega regions cover only a fraction of the earth’s surface and contain just 18 percent of its population but produce 66 percent of all economic activity and 85 percent of technological and scientific innovation.6 Unfortunately, explosive growth also causes significant problems. Mega regions and mega cities face unprecedented urban sprawl, carbon emissions, and economic inequality. These problems exist both in the developed world, where a significant majority of the population already lives in urban areas, and the developing world, where the greatest urban growth is currently occurring.7 Each of these problems compounds the others. For instance, urban sprawl increases transport costs, raises energy consumption, and spurs resource use, thereby adding to carbon emissions 1 United Nations Population Fund, Linking Population, Poverty and Development (May 2007), http://www.unfpa.org/pds/urbanization.htm. 2 Population Reference Bureau, Human Population: Urbanization (2012), http://www.prb.org/educators/teachersguides/humanpopulation/urbanization.aspx. 3 Id. 4 John Vidal, UN Report: World’s Biggest Cities Merging into Mega-Regions, THE GUARDIAN (Mar. 22, 2010), available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/22/un-cities-mega-regions. 5 See, e.g., EDWARD GLAESER, TRIUMPH OF THE CITY: HOW OUR GREATEST INVENTION MAKES US RICHER, SMARTER, GREENER, HEALTHIER, AND HAPPIER (2011). 6 Vidal, supra note 4. 7 See UN-HABITAT, State of the World’s Cities 2008/2009 (2008), available at http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=2562. 4 and economic inequality. Indeed, cities account for just two percent of the earth’s landed surface but produce 70 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions, a number likely to increase as cities and populations expand.8 The readily apparent challenges of urban growth have attracted the attention and problem-solving efforts of academics, planners and policymakers. However, while these are global issues, policymakers tend to seek solutions from a limited number of sources. In the United States, when we do look abroad for solutions, we often turn to European neighbors for insights and rarely look beyond the high-income membership of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) for policy ideas.9 U.S. policymakers’ narrow focus on OECD best practices is troublesome: it ignores swaths of potentially valuable lessons, many of which may actually be more relevant to the U.S. than those currently studied. For example, Sweden is often heralded for its community development innovations and focus on environmentally sustainable development. However, Sweden’s generous social spending and minimal economic inequality, coupled with the fact that its annual urban growth rate is far below that of the United States, renders many of its lessons inapplicable in the U.S. context.10 This paper seeks to turn the reader’s attention from the oft-cited practices of European cities to an example further south. It highlights innovations in Curitiba, Brazil that have been successful in alleviating the interrelated problems of urban growth: sprawl, environmental degradation, and economic inequality. While perhaps less familiar 8 UN-HABITAT, Hot Cities: Battleground for Climate Change (Mar. 29, 2011), http://www.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/GRHS2011/P1HotCities.pdf. 9 The following countries are members of the OECD: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States. 10 The World Bank, Urban Population Growth (2010), http://search.worldbank.org/data?qterm=urban%20growth&language=EN. 5 than the examples of our OECD counterparts, the planning and development strategies employed by this Brazilian city over the past decades are equally noteworthy.11 At its core, Curitiba exemplifies how the integration of land use planning, transportation infrastructure, and environmental sustainability efforts can enable a city to meet the needs of its expanding population and mitigate the negative effects of urban growth. As such, both its innovations and the foundational principles underlying them are deeply relevant to expanding metropolises worldwide. In sum, this paper aims to highlight Curitiba’s innovations and illustrate their relevance to other growing cities. It proceeds as follows. The report begins with an overview of Curitiba’s history and the basic framework developed to address the challenges attendant with tremendous growth. It then discusses specific practices employed by Curitiba to mitigate the negative impacts of growth and concludes by addressing how Curitiba’s innovations can be applied in other urban contexts, both in the United States and abroad. II. Urban Growth in Curitiba Curitiba, the capital of the southern state of Paraná, is one of the fastest growing cities in South America. Its explosive growth over the past half century has required the city to demonstrate tremendous resourcefulness in tackling the accompanying problems of sprawl, congestion, environmental impacts, and social inequality. The strategies it has employed in combating these challenges are instructive for other growing cities. 11 Though less known in the United States, Curitiba has received international recognition for its efforts. Curitiba won the prestigious Globe Sustainable City Award in 2010 for its excellent sustainable urban development. Press Release, The Brazilian city Curitiba awarded the Globe Sustainable City (Apr. 7, 2010) at http://globeaward.org/winner-city-2010. 6 The City’s metropolitan population currently