ASPM Regulates Wnt Signaling Pathway Activity in the Developing Brain

ASPM Regulates Wnt Signaling Pathway Activity in the Developing Brain

Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RESEARCH COMMUNICATION micrencephaly has a pronounced effect upon forebrain ASPM regulates Wnt signaling development and is accompanied by mental retardation pathway activity in the (Bond et al. 2002, 2003; Roberts et al. 2002). Mutations in one of seven genes that localize to the centrosome are developing brain known to underlie development of MCPH (Guernsey et al. 1,2 1,2,3 2010; Kaindl et al. 2010; Nicholas et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2010). Joshua J. Buchman, Omer Durak, Abnormal Spindle Microcephaly (ASPM) harbors the and Li-Huei Tsai1,2,3,4 most numerous cohort of causative MCPH mutations 1 (Passemard et al. 2009). ASPM and its orthologs have been Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Picower Institute implicated in spindle organization, spindle orientation, for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of mitotic progression, and cytokinesis (Fish et al. 2006; 2 Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; Howard Paramasivam et al. 2007; van der Voet et al. 2009; Higgins Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, Aspm 3 et al. 2010). mutant mice display mild microceph- USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute, aly without obvious increases in apoptosis, supporting Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA the notion that MCPH is caused by defects in embryonic neural progenitor proliferation (Pulvers et al. 2010). Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is Recent work has identified ASPM as a positive regula- a neural developmental disorder in which patients display tor of the Wnt signaling pathway, suggesting a potential significantly reduced brain size. Mutations in Abnormal biological pathway through which ASPM may regulate Spindle Microcephaly (ASPM) are the most common cause neurogenesis (Major et al. 2008). FoxO activity negatively of MCPH. Here, we investigate the underlying functions of regulates Aspm expression while promoting expression Aspm in brain development and find that Aspm expression of Wnt pathway antagonists in neural progenitor cells, is critical for proper neurogenesis and neuronal migration. suggesting a mechanism to link Aspm expression and Wnt The Wnt signaling pathway is known for its roles in em- activity (Paik et al. 2009). Additionally, ASPM overexpres- bryogenesis, and genome-wide siRNA screens indicate that sion, like many Wnt-activating components, is associated with increased cell proliferation and tumor development, ASPM is a positive regulator of Wnt signaling. We dem- supporting a common effect on proliferation (Kouprina onstrate that knockdown of Aspm results in decreased et al. 2005; Hagemann et al. 2008; Klaus and Birchmeier Wnt-mediated transcription, and that expression of stabi- 2008; Lin et al. 2008; Bikeye et al. 2010; Vulcani-Freitas lized b-catenin can rescue this deficit. Finally, coexpression et al. 2011). On the other hand, decreased expression of the of stabilized b-catenin can rescue defects observed upon in schizophrenia risk gene Disc1 or its binding partner, vivo knockdown of Aspm. Our findings provide an impetus Dixdc1, results in diminished Wnt signaling activity with to further explore Aspm’s role in facilitating Wnt-mediated accompanying deficits in embryonic and adult cortical neurogenesis programs, which may contribute to psychi- neurogenesis (Mao et al. 2009; Singh et al. 2010). atric illness etiology when perturbed. In this study, we explore the role of Aspm in cortical development and examine the functional interaction of Supplemental material is available for this article. Aspm with the Wnt signaling pathway. We report that in vivo knockdown of Aspm in the developing mouse brain Received April 19, 2011; revised version accepted August 15, results in defects in neurogenesis, neuronal migration, 2011. and cortical layer formation. We also demonstrate that Aspm promotes Wnt signaling activity, and that reduc- tion of Aspm can be rescued by overexpression of the Wnt Development of the mammalian cortex requires several signal transducer b-catenin. Finally, we demonstrate that subprocesses, including progenitor cell proliferation, neu- the in vivo overexpression of b-catenin can rescue defects rogenesis, neuronal migration, and establishment and in neurogenesis but not neuronal migration defects refinement of synaptic connectivity. The Wnt pathway caused by Aspm reduction. plays a prominent role in establishing the forebrain anterior–posterior axis (Fukuchi-Shimogori and Grove 2001) and promoting neural progenitor proliferation Results and Discussion (Chenn and Walsh 2002; Zhou et al. 2004; Woodhead et al. 2006; Kim et al. 2009), dendritogenesis (Yu and Aspm expression is necessary to maintain proliferation Malenka 2003; Rosso et al. 2005; Wayman et al. 2006), of neural progenitors at early stages of corticogenesis axon establishment and guidance (Wang et al. 2002; Keeble et al. 2006), and synaptogenesis (Freese et al. 2010). In order to examine the role of Aspm in brain develop- Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) ment, we screened small hairpins for Aspm knockdown is a disease characterized by an abnormally small head capacity. We found two different small hairpins (shA1 and circumference that manifests during prenatal develop- sha2) capable of knocking down levels of Aspm as assayed ment (Aicardi 1992; Tunca et al. 2006). The underlying by quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Control and shA1, n = 5; shA2, n = 3) (Supplemental Fig. 1). We used these small hairpins to examine the effect of Aspm knockdown on [Keywords: microcephaly; neurogenesis; schizophrenia; Wnt; centrosome; neural progenitor cells at early stages of corticogenesis. neocortex] We performed in utero electroporation at embryonic day 4Corresponding author. E-mail [email protected]. 12 (E12) using a combination of either nontargeting small Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.16830211. hairpin (control) or shASPM expression constructs and GENES & DEVELOPMENT 25:1909–1914 Ó 2011 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/11; www.genesdev.org 1909 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Buchman et al. a GFP expression construct to mark electroporated cells. region of the cortex following Aspm knockdown (all Brains were harvested at E15 and examined for distribu- groups, n = 3) (Fig. 1C). We also observed a significant tion across cortical zones (Fig. 1A). We found that decrease in mitotic activity at E15 based on phospho- knockdown resulted in significantly fewer cells remain- histone H3 (PHH3) staining (all groups, n = 4) (Fig. 1 D,E). To ing in the proliferative regions of the ventricular/subven- examine the overall proliferative capacity of the control tricular zones (VZ/SVZ) and significantly more cells and Aspm knockdown populations, we performed in residing in the intermediate zone (IZ) compared with utero surgery at E12, followed by pulse labeling with controls (Control, n = 3; shA1, n = 5; shA2, n = 3) (Fig. 1B). 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) at E14. Brains were har- Additionally, there was a strong trend toward fewer cells vested 24 h later (Fig. 1F). Quantification of BrdU labeling entering the cortical plate (CP) following Aspm knock- in the GFP+ population showed a significant decrease down (P = .0627) (Fig. 1B). within the shA1/shA2-expressing samples compared The fact that fewer cells remained in the VZ/SVZ with controls (Control and shA1, n = 5; shA2, n = 6) following Aspm knockdown suggested defects in the (Fig. 1G), indicating an overall decrease in cell prolifera- maintenance of cell proliferation and premature neuronal tion. Conversely, there was a significant increase within differentiation. We examined these possibilities by look- the GFP+, BrdU+ population of cells that no longer ing at the overlap of the GFP-positive (GFP+) cell pop- expressed Ki67 at E15 following Aspm knockdown com- ulation with Tuj1, a marker of differentiated neurons, at pared with controls (Control and shA1, n = 5; shA2, n = 6) E15 (Fig. 1A). We found a significant increase in the (Fig. 1H). Aside from shA1 and shA2, we found an fraction of GFP+ cells that overlapped with the Tuj1+ additional small hairpin (shA3) that phenocopied shA1 and shA2 by all measured criteria following E12 electroporation (Supplemental Fig. 1B–G). Aspm expression is necessary for proper neuronal migration and cell fate acquisition during later stages of corticogenesis In order to gain a broader understanding of the role of Aspm in corticogenesis, we performed in utero knockdown of Aspm at E15 and analyzed distri- bution of cells across cortical zones at E19 (Fig. 2A). We found a significant increase in the frac- tion of GFP+ cells in the IZ and a significant decrease in the fraction of GFP+ cells in the CP compared with controls (all groups, n = 3) (Fig. 2B). This suggested a severe defect in neuronal migra- tion in the presence of reduced Aspm levels, where cells became arrested in the IZ but failed to complete migration into the CP. Additionally, we noted a significant increase in the fraction of cells arrested in the SVZ, also suggesting a migra- tion defect (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, while we noted an overall increase in the fraction of cells found in the VZ/SVZ compartments overall, in knock- down versus control samples, this shift could be attributed mainly to the increase in GFP+ cells found in the SVZ at this time point. We examined the GFP+ population exclusive to the VZ and SVZ and found that there was a significant decrease in the fraction of cells found in the VZ and a signif- icant increase in the fraction of cells in the SVZ Figure 1. Aspm knockdown decreases neural progenitor proliferation in the compared with controls (all groups, n = 3) (Fig. developing cortex. (A) Images of E15 mouse cortices electroporated at E12 with 2C). This shift from the VZ to the SVZ among nontargeting (top panels, Control) or ASPM-directed small hairpin (bottom panels, shASPM) and GFP expression plasmids. Images were stained for GFP and cells with reduced Aspm levels also suggested an either Hoechst (left)orTuj1(right).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us