Superconductor-insulator transition and topological nature of the Bose metal M. C. Diamantini,1 C. A. Trugenberger,2 I. Lukyanchuk,3 and V.M. Vinokur4, 5 1NiPS Laboratory, INFN and Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, University of Perugia, via A. Pascoli, I-06100 Perugia, Italy 2SwissScientific Technologies SA, rue du Rhone 59, CH-1204 Geneva, Switzerland 3University of Picardie, Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Amiens, 80039, France 4Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439, USA 5Computation Institute, University of Chicago, 5735 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA It has long been believed that at absolute zero electrons can form only one quantum coherent state, a super- conductor. Yet, several two dimensional superconducting systems were found to harbor the superinsulating state with infinite resistance, a mirror image of superconductivity, and a metallic state often referred to as Bose metal, characterized by finite longitudinal and vanishing Hall resistances. The nature of these novel and mysterious quantum coherent states is the subject of intense study. Here, we propose a topological gauge description of the superconductor-insulator transition (SIT) that enables us to identify the underlying mechanism of superinsula- tion as Polyakov’s linear confinement of Cooper pairs via instantons. We find a criterion defining conditions for either a direct SIT or for the SIT via the intermediate Bose metal and demonstrate that this Bose metal phase is a Mott topological insulator in which the Cooper pair-vortex liquid is frozen by Aharonov-Bohm interactions. The dual quantum Aharonov–Bohm and Aharonov–Casher the first-order Lagrangian [28] L = ('N˙ − N'˙)=2 − H(N;'), effects [1,2] and a paradigm of topological phase transi- having as canonically conjugate pair of variables an ampli- tions by Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) [3–6] brought tude N and the 2π-periodic phase '. Depending on the pa- topology to prominence in condensed matter physics. The rameters of the Hamiltonian H(N;'), one finds three possi- superconductor-insulator transition (SIT) in strongly disor- ble outcomes of the uncertainty principle following from the dered superconducting films and Josephson junction arrays commutation relation, [N;'] = i~: (i) sharp ' = x and plane (JJA) [7–18], gripping both in a whole, hosts fascinating quan- waves ∼ e−ixN for H ≡ H('); (ii) sharp N = y and plane tum phases emerging from the intertwined charges and vor- waves ∼ e−iy' for H ≡ H(N); and (iii) eigenstates with fixed tices and their topological interactions. The nature of the SIT quantized uncertainties ∆N and ∆' in the general case. Go- critical region and the phases it harbors still remain mysterious ing over to an infinite number of degrees of freedom, en- and are the subject of intense research and debate. Here we coded in a field Ψ = N exp(i'), one finds that all three re- develop a long-distance topological gauge theory of the SIT alizations of the uncertainty principle appear manifestly as and find, in its critical vicinity, three competing quantum or- distinct quantum states around the quantum tri-critical point ders: the superconductor, the superinsulator [14–17], and the of the SIT: a superconductor, comprising N-plane waves and quantum Bose metal (QM) [19, 20], which, as we will show, fixed ' (Cooper pair condensate); a superinsulator, '-plane is a Mott topological insulator (TI) [21–23]. We find that, if waves with sharp N (vortex condensate) [14–17]; and a phase quantum fluctuations are weak, the SIT occurs as a first-order harboring both frozen charge and vortex fluctuations (neither direct superconductor-superinsulator transition with granular Cooper pairs nor vortices condense), which is the topological superconducting-insulating texture forming around the phase insulator [21–23]. Accordingly, the SIT is a quantum phase boundary. Strong quantum fluctuations, instead drive the SIT transition between the generic dual superconducting and su- via the intermediate TI phase. The three quantum phases near perinsulating states, which can be either a direct transition or the SIT epitomize the possible mechanisms for a gauge field and indirect one, going through the intermediate topological mass without Higgs fields, with the TI and the superconduc- insulator state. tor realizing topologically massive gauge models [24] and the We consider a lateral JJA, which sets the perfect stage for superinsulator implementing [25] Polyakov’s instanton-driven a gauge theory and adequately models superconducting disor- linear confinement with neutral mesons as excitations [26]. dered films [12, 29]. The properties of the JJA are controlled Our findings pave the way to a direct probing of gauge topo- by the competition between the Josephson coupling energy EJ 2 logical models by desktop experiments on easily accessible and the charging energy EC = (2e )=2C of a single Josephson arXiv:1710.10575v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 13 Jun 2018 superconducting systems. junction, C being the junction capacitance [7]. At EJ > EC, su- perconducting correlations win and the system is a supercon- In the framework of the gauge theory, the superconductor- ductor. At E < E , the Coulomb blockade turns the system insulator transition (SIT) [7–13] appears as a material realiza- J C insulating. tion of the field-theoretical S-duality, which, in its simplest form, expresses the invariance of Maxwell’s equations under The Hamiltonian for a lateral JJA, modeled as a 2D grid of the interchange of electric and magnetic fields in the presence superconducting granules coupled by weak links is of magnetic monopoles [27]. To gain an insight into the role 1 X X of S-duality in the physics of the SIT, let us consider its sim- H = V(C − C`2∆)V + E (1 − cos(2`r φ)); (1) 2 0 J l plest quantum mechanical example, a system endowed with x x;l 2 Superconductor Superinsulator a M b M 1 1 e Q Q e -1 0 1 -1 0 1 Topological insulator -1 -1 Topological insula Superinsulator/Superconductor Topological insulator coexistence c M d M Superinsulator Superinsulator Superconductor 1 1 Superconductor Q Q -1 0 1 -1 0 1 -1 -1 FIG. 1. The configurations that minimize the string gas free energy are determined by the integer quantum numbers that fall in the interior of an ellipse with semi-axes given by the model parameters. (a) Superconductor: strings with electric quantum numbers condense. (b) Superinsula- tor: Strings with magnetic quantum numbers condense. (c) Coexistence of long electric and magnetic strings: this is an unstable configuration c near the first-order direct transition from a superinsulator to a superconductor, the strings with the quantum numbers that minimize their self-energy are the stable configurations. (d) Topological insulator/quantum metal: all strings are suppressed by their high self-energy. The resulting phase diagram is shown in panel (e). where the sum is taken over all the points x of the grid, ` is Thus, the first three terms express the doubled topologically the lattice spacing, l is the vector connecting adjacent super- massive gauge theory [24] for a 2D gauge invariant massive conducting granules, V is the electric potential in the granule photon with no Higgs field. Note that, contrary to the pure x, rlφ is the superconducting phase difference between ad- Chern-Simons term used to model topological states in strong jacent granules, C0 is the granule capacitance to the ground, magnetic fields [30], this mixed, or doubled Chern-Simons and we assume C C0. To construct the gauge theory of term does not violate parity and time-reversal (in Minkowski the SIT, we follow [12] and express the JJA partition func- space) since it involves a vector and a pseudovector gauge R tion Z = DVD' exp(−H=T) via an Euclidean action of a field [14]. The last two terms, comprising integer-valued fields coupled Coulomb gas of charges and vortices. Then we intro- Qµ and Mµ, describe the topological excitations – electric duce two gauge fields aµ and bµ which mediate these Coulomb and magnetic strings [26] – arising from the compactness of interactions [14] and, after a few transformations obtain (see the U(1) gauge group and representing (Cooper pair) charge Supplementary Material (SM)) the Euclidean action of a topo- and vortex excitations, respectively. Strings can be closed, logical gauge field theory: in which case they are the “world-lines” of charge-anticharge X `3 `3 `3 and vortex-antivortex quantum fluctuations over the ground S = fµ fµ + i aµkµνbν + gµgµ + state, or else, infinitely long, representing then the “world- 8π2E π 16E x J c lines” of point charges and vortices. Infinitely long strings p can also end on electric or magnetic (monopole) instantons, i` 2 aµQµ + bµ Mµ ; (2) describing tunneling events [26]. where the sum runs over the Euclidean 3D discrete lattice, The gauge theory defined by the action (2) enables a com- Greek indices denote the coordinate axes and repeated indices prehensive description of the interplay of the distinct orders mean summation. We use natural units, c = 1, ~ = 1, but emerging in the critical vicinity of the SIT. Our first step is we will restore the physical units when necessary. The first to find the free energy associated with the charge and vor- and the third terms in this action describe Josephson cou- tex topological excitations. To that end, we integrate out the pling and Coulomb energies in the JJA expressed through the gauge fields in (2) and obtain (see SM) the free energy of gauge fields, fµ = kµνbν, gµ = kµνaν, and kµν = S µµανdα is a topological string of length L = N` carrying electric and the lattice Chern-Simons operator, formulated in terms of the magnetic quantum numbers Q and M, respectively, assigned lattice derivative dα and shift operator S µ f (x) = f (x + `µˆ) to every bond belonging to the string in a form guaranteeing gauge invariance (see SM).