Case: 18-16547, 11/21/2018, ID: 11096832, DktEntry: 15-2, Page 1 of 297 Docket No. 18-16547 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit KEVIN COOPER, et al., Plaintiff - Appellees v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants - Appellees ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from Denial of Motion to Intervene by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 06-cv-0219 – Honorable Richard G. Seeborg Excerpts of Record, Volume Two MICHAEL A. RAMOS MICHAEL A. HESTRIN STEPHEN M. District Attorney District Attorney WAGSTAFFE Robert P. Brown Ivy B. Fitzpatrick District Attorney Chief Deputy Managing Deputy COUNTY OF District Attorney District Attorney SAN MATEO James R. Secord COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 400 County Center Deputy 3960 Orange Street 3rd Floor District Attorney Riverside, CA 92501 Redwood City, CA COUNTY OF (951) 955-5555 94063 SAN BERNARDINO FAX (951) 955-7640 (650) 363-4636 303 West Third Street 5th Floor Attorneys for Appellants San Bernardino, CA 92415 District Attorneys’ Offices (909) 382-7755 of San Bernardino, Riverside FAX (909) 748-1376 and San Mateo Counties Case: 18-16547, 11/21/2018, ID: 11096832, DktEntry: 15-2, Page 2 of 297 EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volume One Order Denying Motions to Intervene and Denying Request for Judicial Notice – Docket # 676 .............................................................................................................. 1 Volume Two Notice of Motion and Motion to Intervene by Guy Rowland, and for Stay of Execution; Memorandum of Points and Authorities – Docket # 689 ...................... 12 Order Setting Briefing Schedule – Docket # 688 .................................................... 35 Joint Litigation Schedule – Docket # 687 ................................................................ 36 Notice of Joint Appeal – Docket # 677 .................................................................... 45 Notice RE: Finalization of Lethal Injection Protocol – Docket # 635 .................... 56 Order Granting Motions to Intervene and to Stay Execution and Granting Motion for Judicial Notice – Docket # 631 ........................................................................ 118 Defendants’ Opposition to Ayala’s Motion to Intervene and for Stay of Execution – Docket # 628 ....................................................................................................... 124 Statement of Recent Decision – Docket # 616 ...................................................... 146 Order Granting Motions to Intervene and Motions to Stay Executions – Docket # 606 .......................................................................................................................... 151 Excepts of Record - i Case: 18-16547, 11/21/2018, ID: 11096832, DktEntry: 15-2, Page 3 of 297 Order Granting Kevin Cooper’s Motion to Intervene and to Stay Execution – Docket # 581 .......................................................................................................... 155 Order Resolving Motions to Intervene and to Stay Executions – Docket # 563 ... 159 Joint Statement Containing a Proposed Schedule or Schedules – Docket # 552 .. 165 Answer to Fourth Amended Complaint – Docket # 486 ....................................... 169 Fourth Amended Complaint for Equitable and Injunctive Relief – Docket # 428 ................................................................................................................................ 180 Order Following Remand – Docket # 424 ............................................................. 237 Order Granting Motion for Leave to Intervene and Denying Conditionally Intervenor’s Motion for a Stay of Execution – Docket # 401 ............................... 246 Defendants’ Responses to Court’s Inquiries – Docket # 394 ................................ 257 Application for Order Shortening Time; Declaration of David A. Senior – Docket # 386 .......................................................................................................................... 261 Third Amended Complaint for Equitable and Injunctive Relief – Docket # 323 ................................................................................................................................ 265 Complaint for Equitable and Injunctive Relief – Docket # 5 ................................ 288 Volume Three Civil Docket for Case # 3:06-cv-00219-RS ........................................................... 305 Excepts of Record - ii Case:Case 18-16547,3:06-cv-00219-RS 11/21/2018, Document ID: 11096832, 689 Filed DktEntry: 10/31/18 15-2, Page Page 1 4 of of 23 297 David A. Senior (SBN 108759) MCBREEN & SENIOR 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Eleventh Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 Phone: (310) 552-5300 Fax: (310) 552-1205 [email protected] John R. Grele (SBN 167080) LAW OFFICE OF JOHN R. GRELE 1000 Brannan Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 Phone: (415) 655-8776 Fax: (415) 484-7003 [email protected] Richard P. Steinken (admitted PHV) JENNER & BLOCK 353 N. Clark Street Chicago, IL 60654 Phone: (312) 923-2938 Fax: (312) 840-7338 [email protected] Attorneys for Intervenor GUY ROWLAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL ANGELO MORALES, et al., ) CASE NO. C 06 0219 RS ) C 06-0926 RS Plaintiffs, ) ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO vs. ) INTERVENE BY GUY ROWLAND, AND FOR ) STAY OF EXECUTION; MEMORANDUM OF RALPH DIAZ, Acting Secretary of the ) POINTS AND AUTHORITIES California Department of Corrections and ) Rehabilitation, et al., ) DATE: December 6, 2018 ) TIME: 1:30 p.m. Defendants. ) PLACE: Courtroom 3 _______________________________ Excerpts of Record - 12 Case:Case 18-16547,3:06-cv-00219-RS 11/21/2018, Document ID: 11096832, 689 Filed DktEntry: 10/31/18 15-2, Page Page 2 5 of of 23 297 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 6, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as he may be heard, before the Honorable Richard Seeborg in Courtroom 3 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, Intervenor Guy Rowland will and hereby does move the Court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 24, for an order granting him leave to intervene in the present matter. Intervenor’s claims share with the main action common questions of law or fact. Intervenor further will and does move the Court for an order staying his execution. There is a strong likelihood the present matter will succeed on the merits, the relative harm to the parties weighs in favor of Intervenor, and Intervenor has not delayed unnecessarily in bringing this motion for a stay. The motions are based on this Notice, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, along with all exhibits and papers filed in this action, and on any evidence received at the hearing. DATED: October 31, 2018 By: /s/ David A. Senior McBREEN & SENIOR Richard P. Steinken JENNER & BLOCK John R. Grele LAW OFFICE OF JOHN R. GRELE Attorneys for Intervenor GUY ROWLAND Excerpts of Record - 13 Case:Case 18-16547,3:06-cv-00219-RS 11/21/2018, Document ID: 11096832, 689 Filed DktEntry: 10/31/18 15-2, Page Page 3 6 of of 23 297 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................................................. ii MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES .................................................... 3 I. ISSUES TO BE DECIDED .............................................................................................. 3 II. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT FACTS ................................................................................ 3 III. INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO INTERVENE SHOULD BE GRANTED ............................ 11 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 11 B. Intervenor’s Motion to Intervene Is Timely ........................................................ 12 C. Intervenor is Entitled to Intervention as of Right. ............................................... 14 D. Intervenor Meets the Standards for Permissive Intervention .............................. 16 1. This Court Has Independent Grounds for Jurisdiction ........................................ 16 2. Intervenor’s Motion to Intervene Is Timely ........................................................ 16 3. Intervenor’s Claims and the Main Action Have Common Questions of Law or Fact ............................................................................................................................. 16 IV. MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION .............................................................................. 18 A. Intervenor is Likely to Succeed on the Merits .................................................... 18 B. Possibility of Irreparable Harm ........................................................................... 19 C. No Unnecessary Delay ........................................................................................ 20 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 21 Excerpts of Record - 14 Case:Case 18-16547,3:06-cv-00219-RS 11/21/2018, Document ID: 11096832, 689 Filed DktEntry: 10/31/18 15-2, Page Page 4 7 of of 23 297 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2005) .................................................... 18 Citizens for Balanced Use v. Mont. Wilderness Ass’n, 647 F.3d 893 (9th Cir. 2011) ...... 15