Short Notes Chemical Stimuli Mediate Species Recognition in Podarcis Wall

Short Notes Chemical Stimuli Mediate Species Recognition in Podarcis Wall

Short Notes Chemical stimuli mediate species recognition in Podarcis wall lizards Diana Barbosa1,2, Ester Desfilis1, Miguel A. Carretero2, Enrique Font1 The mechanisms whereby closely related lin- species (Cooper and Vitt, 1985, 1986a, 1987; eages, often very similar in morphology, achieve Mason and Gutzke, 1990; Mason, 1992; Labra reproductive isolation in sympatry have at- et al., 2001). tracted considerable attention (Andersson, 1994; In recent years, molecular techniques, com- Tregenza et al., 2000). Results from several taxa bined with morphological studies, have clarified suggest that behaviour plays a major role in the phylogenetic relationships within the genus preventing interspecific matings. Differences in Podarcis (Harris et al., 1998; Harris and Arnold, mating signals between species are often much 1999; Oliverio et al., 2000). However, in the more marked than morphological differences Iberian Peninsula, Podarcis taxonomy has been and provide a major barrier to gene exchange, controversial and unstable, with the identifica- which may lead to speciation (Uzendoski and tion of several cryptic forms (Sá-Sousa, 2001a; Verrell, 1993; Butlin and Ritchie, 1994). In an- Harris and Sá-Sousa, 2001, 2002; Harris et al., imals with well-developed chemosensory sys- 2002; Pinho et al., 2003). Initially, the limited tems, detection of species-specific chemicals al- morphological variation between forms led to lows individuals to recognize each other as po- the belief that they were morphotypes, but re- tential mates and promotes assortative mating cent molecular studies have revealed large ge- (Dawley, 1987; Uzendoski and Verrell, 1993; netic distances suggesting that some of these Verrell, 2003; Linn and Roelofs, 1989; Shine forms are probably distinct species (Harris and et al., 2002; reviewed in Wyatt, 2003). Squa- Sá-Sousa, 2002). mates are arguably among the most chemosen- Few studies of chemoreception in Podarcis sory of vertebrates (Burghardt, 1980; Halpern, have concerned themselves with the issue of 1992; Font, 1996) and chemicals released at the species recognition. Gómez et al. (1993) pro- time of reproduction may provide the basis for vided the first evidence of chemically-mediated species recognition and avoidance of interspe- species recognition in a lacertid: male Podar- cific matings among closely related sympatric cis hispanica are capable of detecting and dis- criminating conspecific from non-conspecific 1 - Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolu- (Psammodromus algirus) chemicals. However, tiva, Universidad de Valencia. Apartado 22085, 46071 the two species used in this study were not even Valencia, Spain congeneric. More recently, Cooper and Pérez- e-mail: [email protected] Mellado (2002), working also with P. hispan- 2 - Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recur- sos Genéticos (CIBIO/UP), Campus Agrário de Vairão, ica, reported that males of this species have the 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal ability to discriminate between sympatric con- © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2005. Amphibia-Reptilia 26 (2005): 257-263 Also available online - www.brill.nl 258 Short Notes geners based on chemical cues alone. These temperature-controlled room (20-30◦C) at ambient humid- findings point to a possible role of chemorecep- ity (31-74%). Lizards were fed daily with Tenebrio moni- tor larvae dusted with vitamins, supplemented occasionally tion as an ethological isolating mechanism in with other insects, such as small crickets (Acheta domes- this complex genus. tica). In this study, we set out to determine whether The experimental trials were conducted during June chemical stimuli might contribute to repro- 2003. Trials consisted of gently picking up a male and transferring it to a test terrarium (40 × 20 × 25 cm) for a ductive isolation between Podarcis bocagei 10-minute observation period. The test terrarium was kept (Seoane, 1884) and Podarcis carbonelli (Pérez- in the same room where lizards were housed and had a 40W Mellado, 1981). Both species are small ground- incandescent bulb suspended ca. 20 cm above the floor of the terraria as a source of heat and light. The floor of the test dwelling lizards endemic from the western terrarium was covered with a paper substrate. The stimulus Iberian Peninsula that were considered con- conditions were prepared by placing an odour donor inside specific until very recently (e.g. Barbadillo the test terrarium in the evening preceding an experimental trial and allowing it to remain there until 20 minutes before et al., 1999; Salvador and Pleguezuelos, 2002). the trial. Shed skin, faeces and other obvious visual stimuli P. carbonelli was described as a subspecies left by the donor were removed prior to the trial. For of P. bocagei following the revalidation of the control trials, the test terrarium was fitted with a clean paper substrate. Eleven females of both species (five P. bocagei latter as a species (Pérez-Mellado, 1981a, b). and six P. carbonelli) acted as donors of chemical stimuli. However, morphological and genetic studies not Males were tested three times, once in a clean test terrarium only support the specific status of P. carbonelli (control), once in a test terrarium bearing chemical stimuli from a conspecific female, and once in a test terrarium (Sá-Sousa et al., 2000; Sá-Sousa, 2001a; Sá- bearing chemical stimuli from a heterospecific female. Each Sousa and Harris, 2002), but also suggest that lizard was tested only once per day with an inter-trial P. carbonelli and P. bocagei are not even sis- interval of two days. Ten P. carbonelli and nine P. bocagei ter taxa (Harris and Sá-Sousa, 2001, 2002). The males were tested. The order of stimulus presentation was partially counterbalanced to avoid sequence effects. At the two species are similar in their ecology, occupy end of each trial, the paper substrate was discarded and the the same habitats, reproduce at the same time of terrarium was washed thoroughly with water and alcohol to the year, and may even occur in sympatry (Sá- eliminate residual chemical traces. Trials were conducted between 12:00 h and 15:00 h (official local time) when the Sousa, 2001b; Carretero et al., 2002). The fact lizards were fully active. Room temperature at the time of that no morphologically intermediate individu- testing was maintained between 26 and 29◦Cinorderto als between P. carbonelli and P. bocagei have minimize variability arising from thermal dependence of tongue-flick rates (Cooper and Vitt, 1986b). been reported (but see Galán, 2002) raises the Each trial was video-recorded and the lizards’ behav- question of how these two species achieve re- iour was later analysed with the aid of a portable computer productive isolation. As no extrinsic barriers to equipped with JWatcher event-recording software (Blum- stein et al., 2000). As we were interested in the lizards’ hybridization have been described, a likely pos- chemosensory responses, we focused our behavioural ob- sibility is that interbreeding is prevented by be- servations on tongue-flicks, which in squamates function to havioural differences between the two species. acquire chemicals for analysis by the vomeronasal organ lo- Here, we especifically test the ability of males cated in the roof of the mouth (Graves and Halpern, 1989; Halpern, 1992). We scored the latency to the first tongue- of P. carbonelli and P. bocagei to discriminate flick and three types of tongue-flicks: tongue-flicks directed between substrates labelled by females of their at the substrate, tongue-flicks directed at the terrarium walls, own or of the other species. and tongue-flicks directed at the air. We fitted a robust partly nested ANOVA model to rank- During May of 2003, lizards of both species were col- transformed data using SPSS 11.5. We used a group by trials lected in coastal sandy areas of northern Portugal (near repeated measures design with responses to each of the three Porto). The lizards were transported to the laboratory in Va- stimulus conditions as the repeated measure and with indi- lencia in individual plastic terraria (20 × 12 × 16 cm) with vidual males (random factor) nested within species (Quinn a substrate of sand obtained at the capture site. In the lab- and Keough, 2002). The sphericity assumption was tested oratory, lizards were kept in the same terraria, with a per- with Mauchly’s test. In those cases in which significant de- manent supply of water and a rock for basking and shel- partures from sphericity were detected, we tested the signif- ter. Light and heat were provided by incandescent (40 W) icance of treatment effects and of the treatment by species bulbs, placed above each terrarium. Lights were scheduled interaction using adjusted univariate F -ratios and multivari- to provide a 14-10 hour L:D cycle. Terraria were kept in a ate ANOVA statistics (Pillai Trace). Following detection of Short Notes 259 Table 1. Mean (range) number of tongue-flicks and latency (s) shown by the lizards in each treatment. Behavior Treatment Control Conspecific female Heterospecific female Podarcis carbonelli (n = 9) Tongue-flicks (substrate) 53.2 (2-128) 138.3 (38-274) 93.1 (2-194) Tongue-flicks (walls) 94.0 (7-194) 108.9 (51-206) 79.2 (23-146) Tongue-flicks (air) 23.7 (3-58) 25.8 (7-83) 22.9 (4-89) Latency to the first tongue-flick (s) 36.96 (0.99-124.62) 38.93 (1.15-169.28) 22.39 (2.03-74.54) Podarcis bocagei (n = 8) Tongue-flicks (substrate) 77.5 (13-148) 145.9 (0-249) 97.5 (3-214) Tongue-flicks (walls) 139.4 (79-199) 126.7 (1-263) 135.5 (16-287) Tongue-flicks (air) 26.1 (3-40) 30.4 (3-50) 29.9 (5-55) Latency to the first tongue-flick (s) 15.08 (0.55-67.78) 34.56 (0.49-156.59) 20.88 (2.39-69.31) Figure 1. Mean (standard error) number of tongue-flicks performed by the lizards in each treatment (C — control; Cs — conspecific female; H — heterospecific female).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us