Web-Based Administration of a Personality Questionnaire

Web-Based Administration of a Personality Questionnaire

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999,31 (4), 572-577 Web-based administration ofa personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods ROBERT N. DAVIS University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The World-Wide Web holds great promise as a meehanism for questionnaire-based research. But are data from Web-based questionnaires eomparable to data from standard paper-and-peneil question­ naires? This study assessed the equivalenee ofthe Ruminative Responses Seale in a Web-based format and in a paper-and-peneil format among introductory psyehology, upper-level psyehology, and non­ psyehology students. Internal eonsisteney eoefficients were eomparable aeross the groups. The par­ ticipants in the Web sample reported higherlevels of self-foeused rumination than did the othergroups. Women in the Web sample reported more self-foeused rumination than did women in the other groups. In the Websample, results did not eovary with aeeess loeation. These results suggest thatfindings from Web-based questionnaire research are eomparable with results obtained using standard proeedures. The eomputerized Web interface may also facilitate self-disclosure among research participants. The use ofcomputers in psychological assessment has have reported favorable results (e.g., Krantz, Ballard, & increased steadily over the last 30 years (Burke, 1992). Scher, 1997). For example, the results from one experi­ The advent ofthe World-Wide Web otTers unprecedented ment that was conducted both on the Web and in a labo­ opportunities for researchers to benefit from the use of ratory were nearly perfectly correlated (Krantz et al., computers in data collection (Schmidt, 1997; Smith & 1997). Although only a few published studies have ex­ Leigh, 1997). As a research medium, the Web offers re­ amined the equivalence question with respect to Web­ searchers at least four major benefits. First, the Web per­ based versus paper-and-pencil administration ofperson­ mits individuals to send data to a researcher at their con­ ality questionnaires, nascent studies in this area have venience, in terms oftime and location, which increases reported comparable results across domains (Buchanan the potential number of eligible research participants & Smith, in press; Pasveer & Ellard, 1998; Smith & Leigh, (Schmidt, 1997; Smith & Leigh, 1997). Second, the Web 1997; Stanton, 1998). For example, Buchanan and Smith permits automatie transformation ofraw data into an an­ administered the revised version ofthe Self-Monitoring alyzable format, such as an SPSS data file, using proce­ Scale (SMS-R; Gangestad & Snyder, 1985) to Web users dures such as CGI scripts (see Kieley, 1996; Schmidt, on line and also to a local student sampie in paper-and­ Hoffman, & MacDonald, 1997). Third, Web-based re­ pencil format. The factor structure ofthe SMS-R and co­ search is etTicient in terms oftime and the resources it re­ etTicient alphas were found to be comparable across the quires (Schmidt, 1997). Fourth, the Web provides a degree groups, with the Web version yielding some superior re­ of anonymity to research participants, which decreases sults (e.g., coefficient alpha), as compared with previ­ the influence of demand characteristics by facilitating ously reported studies (Buchanan & Smith, 1999). An­ self-disclosure and eliminating observer bias (Esposito, other study that compared Web-based and paper-and­ Agard, & Rosnow, 1984; Hewson, Laurent, & Vogel, pencil vers ions ofan organizationaljustice scale found a 1996; Meszaros, Engelsmann, Meterissian, & Kusalic, similar factor structure across the two domains, as weil 1995; Smith & Leigh, 1997). as more item variability and less missing data in the Web­ Is research conducted over the Web equivalent to re­ based condition (Stanton, 1998). search conducted in more traditional settings, such as a The advent ofWeb-based data collection is a direct ex­ psychology laboratory? Validity studies ofWeb-based re­ tension ofdata collection on stand-alone computers (Bu­ search have recently begun to examine this question and chanan & Smith, in press). Given the current dearth of findings pertaining to Web-based data collection, studies of computerized (non-Web-based) versus paper-and­ This research was supported by U.S. Public Health Grant 51817 to pencil data collection procedures may provide useful in­ Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. I thank Michael Bishop, Jamie Polito, and An­ formation. Research comparing computerized and paper­ drew Ward for their assistance with data collection. I also thank Tom and-pencil assessments has generally found that research Buchanan for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manu­ script. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to participants prefer computerized assessments and are R. N, Davis, who is now at the University ofHouston, Department ofPsy­ equally, ifnot more, willing to report sensitive information chology, Houston, TX 77204-5341 (e-mail: [email protected]). to a computer than to a paper-and-pencil questionnaire Copyright 1999 Psychonomic Society, Inc. 572 WEB-BASED ADMINISTRATION OF A PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE 573 or to a human interviewer (Booth-Kewley, Edwards, & Participants scoring at the upper and/or the lower end of Rosenfeld, 1992; Evan & Miller, 1969; Finegan & Allen, an overall distribution on variables of interest are fre­ 1994; Hile & Adkins, 1997; King & Miles, 1995; Mill­ quently selected for follow-up studies on the basis ofre­ stein, 1987; Petrie & Abell, 1994; Wilson, Genco, & Yager, sults from an initial screening session-for example, a 1986). In one study, recently admitted parasuicide pa­ tendency to engage in self-focused rumination when ex­ tients preferred a computerized interview to an interview periencing dysphoric affect (cf. Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, with a clinician (Petrie & Abell, 1994). In another study, in press). These procedures facilitate research on inter­ recent suicide attempters disclosed more information to actions between subject variables, such as personality computerized depression and suicidal ideation question­ traits, and experimental treatments (cf. Lyubomirsky & naires than to a clinician interviewer (Levine, Ancill, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1993, 1995), as weil as cross-sectional Roberts, 1989). Moreover, the computerized measures studies of variables on which an experimenter wants to were better predictors of suicidality than was the clini­ select participants (e.g., age or gender). cian interviewer (Levine et al., 1989). People also appear The measure used in the present study assesses the ex­ to be more willing to report behaviors such as substance tent to which people tend to respond to feelings of sad­ use to a computer than to a clinician or a paper-and-pencil ness or depression with self-focused rumination. Self­ questionnaire (Lucas, 1977; Lucas, Mullin, Luna, & Mc­ focused rumination describes a tendency to engage in Inroy, 1977; Skinner & Allen, 1983). Although these passive thoughts and behaviors that focus one's attention findings are informative, the extent to which they gener­ on one's depressed mood and on the implications ofthese alize to Web-based research is an open question. symptoms,rather than taking action to alleviate one's Despite the initial promising evidence in support of symptoms (see Nolen-Hoeksema, 1990, 1991,for reviews). Web-based psychological research (e.g., Buchanan & People who ruminate may tend to sit alone and think Srnith, in press; Krantz et al., 1997; Michalak, 1998; about how tired and unmotivated they feel or passively Pasveer & Ellard, 1998; Smith & Leigh, 1997; Stanton, review all the negative happenings in their lives, without 1998), it is necessary to demonstrate the equivalence of taking action to change their situation. The RSQ (Nolen­ Web-based and traditional data collection methods em­ Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991) was developed to assess peo­ pirically be fore adopting Web-based methods exten­ ple's habitual responses to depressed mood, and the RRS sively (Krantz et al., 1997; Smith & Leigh, 1997). There consists of aseries of items on the RSQ that assess the remain numerous potential threats to the reliability and tendency to engage in self-focused rumination. A short validity ofWeb-based questionnaires (see Hewson et al., (IO-item) form of the RRS was recently developed and 1996; Schrnidt, 1997, for reviews). For example, partic­ was used in the present study (cf. Davis & Nolen-Hoek­ ipants recruited from the Web are likely to be more het­ sema, in press). erogeneous on demographie and other variables than par­ In the present study, the RRS was administered to four ticipants recruited by traditional means (Buchanan & sampies ofparticipants: (I) introductory psychology stu­ Smith, in press). Moreover, researchers lose consider­ dents; (2) upper-Ievel psychology students; (3) nonpsy­ able control over the testing environment when conduct­ chology students; and (4) a Web-based studentsampie. ing Web-based research.Some participants may send The nonpsychology and upper-Ievel psychology student data from a quiet roorn, whereas others might send it groups were included in order to determine whether they from a noisy computer laboratory (Reips, 1996). In ad­ differed from introductory psychology students even dition, Web-based research is open to exploitation by peo­ when using the same methods (i.e., paper and pencil) for pie who participate numerous times and/or provide dis­ filling out the questionnaire. The Web sampie was de­ ingenuous data (Schmidt, 1997; Smith & Leigh, 1997).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us