Measurements of the Frequency Spectrum of Transition Radiation*

Measurements of the Frequency Spectrum of Transition Radiation*

VOLUME 38, NUMBER 1 PHYSI t" AL REVIEW LETTERS 3 JxwvaRv 1977 Measurements of the Frequency Spectrum of Transition Radiation* Michael L. Cherry and Dietrich Muller Enrico Ferjni Institute and DePartment of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ittinois 60637 (Received 28 June 1976) We report a measurement of the frequency spectrum of x-ray transition radiation. X rays were generated by electrons of 5 and 9 GeV in radiators of multiple polypropylene foils, and detected in the range 4 to 80 keV with a calibrated single-crystal Bragg spec- trometer. The experimental results closely reproduce the features of the theoretically predicted spectrum. In particular, the pronounced interference pattern of multifoil radia- tors and the expected hardening of the radiation with increasing foil thickness are clearly observed. The overall intensity of the radiation is somewhat lower than predicted by cal- culations. The physical characteristics of x-ray transi- two media. " Using procedures that have been tion radiation have mainly been studied in mea- discussed earlier, 4' "we integrate Eq. (1) over surements of the total radiation yield. Various angles and take into account possible reabsorp- radiator-detector configurations' ' have led to tion of x rays inside the radiator. The resulting results which are in fair agreement with the the- frequency spectrum exhibits striking deviations oretical predictions' "(including the expected from that of a single interface: Pronounced max- saturation of the yield at high particle energies). ima and minima occur; and, for sufficiently high However, a precise measurement of the frequen- particle energy, the spectrum saturates, i.e., it cy sPectrum of this radiation is a much more sig- becomes independent of the particle energy. It nificant test of the theory, and, furthermore, should be pointed out that such oscillations do oc- leads to details crucial for the design of transi- cur even in the case of a single foil (N= 1). If tion-radiation detectors for relativistic particles. the ratio l,/l, is large (i.e. , l,/l, & 10), the shape The results of such a measurement are reported of the spectrum is largely determined by the sin- in this Letter. gle-foil interf erence, although the multiple-foil Let us denote the distribution of the transition- interference governs the saturation at high ener- radiation intensity with respect to the emission gies. '" The exact spectral shape and the posi- angle 8, and the frequency &o, as d'S/d8dcu. In tions of maximum intensity are determined by the idealized case of relativistic particles trav- the dimensions of the radiator. ~ Knowledge of ersing a single interface between two different these details is of prime importance for practi- media, this distribution yields, after integration cal applications. over angles, a frequency spectrum that is a mon- In the present experiment, performed at the otonic function of the x-ray energy "In p.ractice, Cornell University synchrotron, we have mea- intensity considerations require a radiator of sured the transition-radiation spectrum, gener- many interfaces. The radiator dimensions and ated by electrons of 5 and 9 GeV in radiators of the x-ray wavelengths may be comparable in the evenly spaced polypropylene foils (CH, ), with rest frame of a relativistic particle. Therefore, dimensions (200-1000 foils, thickness 16 to 82 the coherent addition of the radiation amplitudes ttm, spacing 1.4 mm) that are typical for practi- from the various interfaces leads to interference cal applications. A magnet was used to deflect phenomena which drastically modify the single- the electrons away from the x-ray detector. %e interface radiation pattern" d'S, /d8d~. For a have used a single-crystal Bragg spectrometer. transparent radiator of N foils of thickness ly Thus we avoided an intrinsic difficulty encount- equally spaced by distances l„one obtains ' "" ered in previous experiments"" "where a pro- portional or solid-state detector was used to measure the x-ray energy, such that single-pho- ton events became indistinguishable from events due to several simultaneous photons. One such sin'[N(l, + /Z, l,/Z, )] experiment has, however, been quite success- sin'(l, + /Z, I,/Z, ) ful" because only very short radiators were used. where Z, ,(8, cu) are the "formation zones" of the Both single- and multiple-foil interference phe- VOLUME 38, NUMBER I PHYSICAL REVIEW I.ETTKRS 5 JANUARY 1977 Scin t i I la tor 0 i f fraction ~ I I I I S4 crystal 9 GeV electrons Col lima tor Electron beam Helium Magnet 1000 Foils PXXi WX/8/XXXPXy CO 1. m C3 3 4 mm/16 p. SS CD gl LLJ LIF, peak at 9. 1 keV I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I It Sl s2 g :2- Scinti I lators Radiator Allfl COIOCldence scintillator A 0 p ply I I / ~ '% (Xe/CO~i Pb shielding FIG. 1. Diagram of the experimental setup. I l l I l 0 5 10 15 20 25 X-Ray Energy(keV) nomena were observed in this case. FIG. 2. Measured pulse-height distributions in the Figure 1 shows our experimental arrangement. proportional counter. The solid points show transition The x-rays reached the spectrometer through a radiation from 1000 CH& foils, while the open symbols obtained with background radiator. Note the good 0.5-cm wide collimator, 6 m from the radiator. are a agreement between the distributions outside the x-ray The spectrometer consisted of a LiF or an organ- peak. ic PET (polyethylene terephthalate) crystal, cov- ering the energy range 4 to 30 keV, and a xenon proportional counter, the signal of which was low differential yield, special efforts were re- pulse-height analyzed. The whole apparatus was quired to shield the apparatus from background. kept in a helium-filled enclosure to reduce x- The absolute ref lectivity of the crystals has ray absorption. Frequent tests were performed been calibrated with laboratory x-ray machines. throughout the runs to check the alignment be- The effective resolution varied between - 1 eV at tween spectrometer and beam. In order to nor- 4 keV and -40 eV at 29 keV. Details of these cal- malize the measured x-ray intensity to the elec- ibration measurements will be described in a tron flux, we assumed that transition-radiation separate publication. photons follow closely (i.e. , 8 =mc'/E) the tra- In Fig. 3 me show the results of our measure- jectory of their parent electrons in the absence ments for three radiators with different foil thick- of a magnetic field. This assumption was veri- nesses, normalized as photons per interface and fied by steering the beam across the spectrom- per electron. The number of foils in each radia- eter slit. With the magnet turned off, the flux tor is chosen such that the total mass (and hence of parent electrons was determined with scintil- the total photoelectric absorption) is approxi- lators by measuring the rate S1 S2 S3 2 (see Fig. mately the same in each case. Our data points 1), where A is a scintillator with an opening are corrected for the efficiency of the crystal through the center matching exactly the dimen- and the xenon counter, and for the transmission sions of the spectrometer slit. of the absorbing material (mainly helium) be- Figure 2 shows two superimposed pulse-height tween the radiator and the spectrometer. Typi- distributions, measured with the LiF crystal set cal errors are indicated. They are essentially for 9-keV x rays. One distribution mas generat- due to small changes in the electron beam and, ed with a radiator in place, while for the other mainly at low intensities, uncertainties in the the radiator was replaced by a solid block of background subtraction. For comparison with polyethylene of the same total mass. This back- the experimental results, the curves in Fig. 3 ground test has been performed for every run. show the shape of the expected distributions, cal- The distinct peak at 9 keV due to transition radi- culated as discussed above. Our data points re- ation is excellently resolved from background, produce the calculated spectral shapes excellent- and at 18 keV even a small second-order peak ly. The maxima and minima due to interference can be noticed. The width of the x-ray peaks is effects are mell resolved and appear exactly at determined by the resolution of the proportional the calculated frequencies. However, our over- counter. Because of the high resolution of the all intensity is somewhat lower than expected. crystal itself, more than 10' electrons are need- In order to fit the experimental data better, the ed for each 9-keV x-ray count. In view of this calculated spectra in Fig. 3 are scaled down by VQLUME 38, +UMBER 1 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS $ JANUARY 1977 I I I I I I I I I I II IIlljllnllllli i plasmapressionn frequency of the foil material). This ex- Thickness= 4 82~m ~9 GeY 200 Foils assumes the radiator to be transparent at Io,„, and it also assumes that l,/l, » 1, i.e. , that the spectrum is determined primarily by sin- gle-foil interference. For the 82- and 50-pm ixIO— radiators, we measure the last maximum at 23 and 15 keg, respectively (see Fig. 3), while OId' =29 and 18 keV. This small but significant shift I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I III II IIIIII' in frequency is caused by multifoil interference CD 4 —Thick effects.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us