Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress

Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress

Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress Prepared for: Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives Submitted by: The Gulf Coast Working Group Final Report July 2017 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF GCWG SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................... 1 2.1.1 THE FAST ACT AND RESPONSE TO CONGRESS ............................................................... 1 2.1.2 GOALS .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................. 2 2.2 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PREVIOUS PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE TO THE GULF COAST ........................................... 2 2.2.2 RECENT HISTORY OF LOCAL SUPPORT TO RESTORE PASSENGER SERVICE .................... 4 2.3 REGIONAL ECONOMIC SUMMARY .................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS .................................................................................... 4 2.4 DESCRIPTION OF PARTIES INVOLVED ............................................................................... 5 2.4.1 GULF COAST WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE & MEMBERSHIP ........................................ 5 2.4.2 GCWG INTERACTION WITH CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS ............................................... 5 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1 EXISTING RAILROAD INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................... 6 3.1.1 ELEMENTS OF RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................ 6 3.1.2 EXISTING GULF COAST CORRIDOR RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................... 6 3.1.2.1 OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................ 9 4 PROPOSED RESTORATION PLAN .......................................................................................... 10 4.1 PREVIOUSLY STUDIED OPTIONS ..................................................................................... 10 4.2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SERVICE OPTIONS .............................................................. 12 4.2.1 ALTERNATIVE A ............................................................................................................ 12 4.2.2 ALTERNATIVE A1 .......................................................................................................... 13 4.2.3 PREFERRED OPTION ....................................................................................................... 14 4.3 PASSENGER SERVICE SCHEDULE COMPARISON .............................................................. 14 4.4 OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................... 15 4.4.1 TERMINALS .................................................................................................................... 15 4.4.1.1 NEW ORLEANS ............................................................................................................... 15 4.4.1.2 MOBILE .......................................................................................................................... 15 4.4.1.3 ORLANDO AREA AND SUNRAIL OPERATIONS ................................................................ 15 4.4.1.4 ROLLING STOCK EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................ 16 4.5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS............................................................................................... 16 4.5.1 STATION REVIEW ........................................................................................................... 16 4.5.1.1 APPROACH TO DEFINING INCREMENTAL STATION IMPROVEMENTS ............................. 16 4.5.1.2 HIGHLIGHTS/SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT FINDINGS ..................................................... 17 4.5.1.3 ORDER-OF-MAGNITUDE CAPITAL COST SUMMARY...................................................... 18 4.5.2 RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................. 19 4.5.2.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 19 4.5.2.2 ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS .................................................... 20 4.5.2.3 FRA IDENTIFIED IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................................. 23 4.5.2.4 FRA IDENTIFIED IMPROVEMENTS FOR CSX LINE AND ORDER OF MAGNITUDE CAPITAL COSTS .............................................................................................................................. 29 Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress i 5 IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................................ 30 5.1 FRA IDENTIFIED PROGRAM OF IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................ 30 5.1.1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS ......................................................... 31 5.1.2 SUMMARY OF STATION, INFRASTRUCTURE & OTHER IMPROVEMENT COSTS .............. 31 5.2 FUNDING ........................................................................................................................ 32 5.2.1 LOCAL FUNDING ............................................................................................................ 32 5.2.1.1 LOCAL MATCH TO FRA GRANTS .................................................................................. 32 5.2.1.2 OTHER LOCAL FUNDING INITIATIVES ........................................................................... 33 5.2.1.3 BP OIL SPILL SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS .......................................................................... 33 5.2.2 THE FAST ACT .............................................................................................................. 33 5.2.2.1 CONSOLIDATED RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (CRISI) PROGRAM ....................................................................................................................................... 33 5.2.2.2 RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (REG) PROGRAM ................................................. 33 5.2.2.3 FASTLANE GRANTS ........................................................................................................ 33 5.2.3 TIGER GRANTS ............................................................................................................... 34 5.2.4 HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS ............................................................................. 34 5.2.4.1 ALABAMA DOT ............................................................................................................. 34 5.2.4.2 LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT (DOTD) .............. 34 5.2.5 RRIF/TIFIA PROGRAMS ................................................................................................ 35 5.3 NEXT STEPS ................................................................................................................... 35 5.3.1 VERIFY RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................... 35 5.3.2 CONFIRM PTC REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................... 35 5.3.3 EVALUATE SAFETY AT GRADE CROSSINGS ................................................................... 35 5.3.3.1 PROPOSED GRADE CROSSING STUDY ............................................................................ 35 5.3.3.2 MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD CORRIDOR WORKING GROUP .................................................. 35 5.3.4 NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ................................................................................. 36 5.3.5 EXECUTE NECESSARY AGREEMENTS ............................................................................ 36 5.3.6 APPLICATION OF POTENTIAL FUNDING ......................................................................... 36 5.3.6.1 REQUEST FOR FUNDING: ................................................................................................ 37 5.3.7 IDENTIFICATION OF REAL ESTATE REQUIREMENTS & DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES 37 5.3.8 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 37 5.3.8.1 EXTEND LONG-DISTANCE SERVICE TO TAMPA, FL ...................................................... 37 5.3.8.2 ASSESSMENT OF EXTENDING STATE-SUPPORTED SERVICE TO ATMORE, AL ............... 37 6 CLOSING STATEMENT ........................................................................................................... 38 Gulf Coast Working Group Report to Congress ii List of Tables TABLE 1 – EXISTING GULF COAST RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE ......................................................... 7 TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    47 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us