New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle A.J. Krasznahorkay,∗ M. Csatl´os, L. Csige, J. Guly´as, M. Koszta, B. Szihalmi, and J. Tim´ar Institute of Nuclear Research (Atomki), P.O. Box 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary D.S. Firak, A.´ Nagy, and N.J. Sas University of Debrecen, 4010 Debrecen, PO Box 105, Hungary A. Krasznahorkay CERN, Geneva, Switzerland and Institute of Nuclear Research, (Atomki), P.O. Box 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary We observed electron-positron pairs from the electro-magnetically forbidden M0 transition depop- ulating the 21.01 MeV 0− state in 4He. A peak was observed in their e+e− angular correlations at 115◦ with 7.2σ significance, and could be described by assuming the creation and subsequent decay 2 −5 of a light particle with mass of mXc =16.84±0.16(stat) ± 0.20(syst) MeV and ΓX= 3.9 × 10 eV. According to the mass, it is likely the same X17 particle, which we recently suggested [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 052501 (2016)] for describing the anomaly observed in 8Be. PACS numbers: 23.20.Ra, 23.20.En, 14.70.Pw Recently, we measured electron-positron angular cor- quantum-numbers of the 8Be∗ and 8Be states, the X17 relations for the 17.6 MeV, and 18.15 MeV, Jπ = 1+ → boson could indeed be a J π = 0− pseudoscalar particle, J π = 0+, M1 transitions in 8Be and anomalous angu- if it was emitted with L = 1 orbital momentum. They lar correlation was observed [1]. Significant peak-like predicted about ten times smaller branching ratio in case enhancement of the internal pair creation was observed of the 17.6 MeV transition compared to the 18.15 MeV at large angles in the angular correlation of the 18.15 one, which is in nice agreement with our results. MeV transition [1]. This was interpreted as the creation The QCD axion is one of the most compelling solutions and decay of an intermediate particle X17 with mass to the strong CP problem. There are major current ef- 2 mXc =16.70±0.35(stat ) ±0.5(sys) MeV. The possible forts in searching for an ultra-light, invisible axion, but relation of the X boson to the dark matter problem and visible axions with decay constants at or below the elec- the fact that it might explain the (g-2)µ puzzle, triggered troweak scale are believed to have been long excluded an enhanced theoretical and experimental interest in the by laboratory searches. Considering the significance of particle and hadron physics community [2, 3]. the axion solution to the strong CP problem, Alves and Zhang and Miller [4] investigated the possibility to ex- Weiner [10] revisited experimental constraints on QCD plain the anomaly within nuclear physics. They explored axions in the O(10 MeV) mass window. In particular, the nuclear transition form factor as a possible origin of they found a variant axion model that remains compat- the anomaly, and find the required form factor to be un- ible with existing constraints. This model predicts new realistic for the 8Be nucleus. particles at the GeV scale coupled hadronically, and a The data were explained by Feng and co-workers [5, 6] variety of low-energy axion signatures, including nuclear with a 16.7 MeV, Jπ =1+ vector gauge boson X17, which de-excitations via axion emission. This reopens the pos- may mediate a fifth fundamental force with some cou- sibility of solving the strong CP problem at the GeV arXiv:1910.10459v1 [nucl-ex] 23 Oct 2019 pling to Standard Model(SM) particles. The X17 bo- scale. Such axions or axion like particles (ALPs) are ex- son is thus produced in the decay of an excited state to pected to decay predominantly also by the emission of − the ground state, 8Be∗ →8Be + X17, and then decays e+e pairs. − through the X17 → e+e process. Delle Rose and co-workers [11] showed that the Constraints on such a new particle, notably from anomaly can be described with a very light Z0 bosonic ′ searches for π0 → Z + γ by the NA48/2 experiment [7], state, stemming from the U(1)0 symmetry breaking, with require the couplings of the Z′ to up and down quarks to significant axial couplings so as to evade a variety of low be protophobic, i.e., the charges eǫu and eǫd of up and scale experimental constraints. They also showed [12] down quarks, written as multiples of the positron charge how both spin-0 and 1 solutions are possible and describe −3 e, satisfy the relation 2ǫu+ǫd ≤ 10 [5, 6]. Subsequently, the Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) scenarios that many studies of such models have been performed includ- can accommodate these. They include BSM frameworks ing an extended two Higgs doublet model [8]. with either an enlarged Higgs, or gauge sector, or both. At the same time, Ellwanger and Moretti made an- In parallel to these recent theoretical studies, we re- other possible explanation of the experimental results investigated the 8Be anomaly with an improved setup. through a light pseudoscalar particle [9]. Given the We have confirmed the signal of the assumed X17 particle 2 2 and constrained its mass (mXc = 17.01(16) MeV) and for both cases (in-beam and off-beam). In this energy branching ratio compared to the γ-decay (Bx = 6(1) × range, no in-beam counts were expected. The elimina- 10−6) [13, 14]. We also re-investigated the e+e− pair tion of cosmic-ray background was then performed until correlation in the 17.6 MeV transition of 8Be, in which a all events disappeared with this high-energy gate. much smaller deviation was observed [15]. In order to reduce the cosmic-ray background, an ac- In order to confirm the existence of the X17 particle tive shield was also installed above the e+e− spectrom- we have conducted a search for its creation and decay in eter. It consisted of 12 pieces of 1.0 cm thick, 4.5 cm − the 21.01 MeV 0 → 0+ transition of 4He. Emission of a wide and 100 cm long plastic scintillators. Half of the 2 + mXc = 17 MeV vector boson (Jπ=1 ) or pseudoscalar cosmic-ray yield could be suppressed in this way. − particle (Jπ=0 ) is allowed in this transition with orbital In the original total energy spectrum of the e+e− pairs angular momentum 1 or 0, respectively. In this Letter we determined using all combinations of the telescopes we report on anomalous creation and angular correlation of have got a very large background from external pairs electron-positron pairs in this transition, which is in good created by γ-rays coming from the direct proton cap- agreement with the scenario of its decay by the assumed ture, which has a cross section of about 2 µb/sr at Ep= X17 particle. 900 keV [18]. In order to reduce the background from 3 4 The H(p,γ) He reaction at Ep=900 keV bombarding the external pair creation, we have created two total- energy was used to populate the wide (Γ = 0.84 MeV) energy spectra. One was constructed from e+e− pairs, − 4 0 second excited state in He [16], located at Ex= 21.01 which were detected by telescope pairs with relative an- MeV. This bombarding energy is below the threshold of gles of 120◦, while the other from e+e− pairs which were 4 ◦ the (p,n) reaction (Ethr=1.018 MeV) and excites the He detected by telescope pairs with relative angles of 60 . + − nucleus to Ex=20.49 MeV, which is below the centroid of Since the e e pairs from the X17 boson are expected − the wide 0 state. A proton beam with a typical current at around 115◦, the first spectrum is expected to contain 3 3 of 1.0 µA was impinged on a H target. The H was the majority of such events, while the second is expected 2 absorbed in a 3 mg/cm thick Ti layer evaporated onto to be mainly background. To enhance the X17 boson 3 a 0.4 mm thick Mo disc. The density of the H atoms events, we subtracted the second spectrum after appro- 20 2 was 2.66 × 10 atoms/cm . The disk was cooled down priate normalization from the first spectrum. 3 to liquid N2 temperature to prevent H evaporation. Fig. 1 shows the resulting spectrum of the e+e− pairs. The investigated 0− state overlaps with the first ex- 4 π + cited state in He (J =0 , Ex=20.21 MeV, Γ=0.50 MeV), which was also excited but but give only a man- agable background to the e+e− spectra. The experiment was performed at the 5 MV Van de 160 Graaff accelerator in Debrecen. Compared to our pre- Counts vious experiment [1, 17], we increased the number of 140 telescopes (from 5 to 6) and we replaced the gas-filled MWPC detectors to a double-sided silicon strip detector 120 (DSSD) array. 100 The e+e− pairs were detected by six plastic scintillator + DSSD detector telescopes placed perpendicularly to 80 the beam direction at azimuthal angles of 0◦, 60◦, 120◦, 180◦, 240◦ and 300◦. The sizes of the scintillators are 60 × × 3 82 86 80 mm each. The positions of the hits were 40 registered by the DSSDs having strip widths of 3 mm Signal region and a thickness of 500 µm. The telescope detectors were 20 placed around a vacuum chamber made of a carbon fiber 0 tube with a wall thickness of 1 mm.