Regularized Covariance Matrix Estimation in Complex Elliptically

Regularized Covariance Matrix Estimation in Complex Elliptically

Regularized Covariance Matrix Estimation in Complex Elliptically Symmetric Distributions Using the Expected Likelihood Approach - Part 2: The Under-Sampled Case Olivier Besson, Yuri Abramovich To cite this version: Olivier Besson, Yuri Abramovich. Regularized Covariance Matrix Estimation in Complex Elliptically Symmetric Distributions Using the Expected Likelihood Approach - Part 2: The Under-Sampled Case. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2013, vol. 61, pp. 5819-5829. 10.1109/TSP.2013.2285511. hal-00904983 HAL Id: hal-00904983 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00904983 Submitted on 15 Nov 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (OATAO) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID: 10074 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2285511 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2285511 To cite this version: Besson, Olivier and Abramovich, Yuri Regularized Covariance Matrix Estimation in Complex Elliptically Symmetric Distributions Using the Expected Likelihood Approach - Part 2: The Under-Sampled Case. (2013) IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 61 (n° 23). ISSN 1053-587X Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] Regularized Covariance Matrix Estimation in Complex Elliptically Symmetric Distributions Using the Expected Likelihood Approach—Part 2: The Under-Sampled Case Olivier Besson, Senior Member, IEEE, and Yuri I. Abramovich, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—In the Þrst part of these two papers, we extended the characterization of the signal to noise ratio loss of adaptive expected likelihood approach originally developed in the Gaussian Þlters [1] or, for detection problems, the now classic papers by case, to the broader class of complex elliptically symmetric (CES) Kelly [2]–[4] about generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) distributions and complex angular central Gaussian (ACG) dis- in unknown Gaussian noise or the adaptive subspace detectors tributions. More precisely, we demonstrated that the probability density function (p.d.f.) of the likelihood ratio (LR) for the (un- of [5]–[7] in partially homogeneous noise environments. All known) actual scatter matrix does not depend on the latter: of them highly beneÞt from the beautiful and rich theory it only depends on the density generator for the CES distribution of multivariate Gaussian distributions and Wishart matrices and is distribution-free in the case of ACG distributed data, i.e., it [8]–[10] and have served as references for decades. At the only depends on the matrix dimension and the number of inde- core of adaptive Þltering or adaptive detection is the problem pendent training samples , assuming that . Additionally, of estimating the disturbance covariance matrix. It is usually regularized scatter matrix estimates based on the EL methodology addressed through the maximum likelihood (ML) principle, were derived. In this second part, we consider the under-sampled scenario which deserves speciÞc treatment since con- mainly because ML estimates have the desirable property of ventional maximum likelihood estimates do not exist. Indeed, in- being asymptotically efÞcient [11], [12]. However, in low ference about the scatter matrix can only be made in the -dimen- sample support, their performance may degrade and they can sional subspace spanned by the columns of the data matrix. We be signiÞcantly improved upon using regularized covariance extend the results derived under the Gaussian assumption to the matrix estimates (CME), such as diagonal loading [13], [14]. CES and ACG class of distributions. Invariance properties of the Moreover, the ML estimator results in the ultimate equal to one under-sampled likelihood ratio evaluated at are presented. Re- markably enough, in the ACG case, the p.d.f. of this LR can be likelihood ratio (LR), a property that is questionable, as argued written in a rather simple form as a product of beta distributed in [15]–[17]. In the latter references, it is proved that the LR, random variables. The regularized schemes derived in the Þrst evaluated at the true covariance matrix , has a probability part, based on the EL principle, are extended to the under-sam- density function (p.d.f.) that does not depend on but only on pled scenario and assessed through numerical simulations. the sample volume and the dimension of the observation Index Terms—Covariance matrix estimation, elliptically space, i.e., number of antennas or pulses. More importantly, symmetric distributions, expected likelihood, likelihood ratio, with high probability the LR takes values much lower than regularization. one and, therefore, one may wonder if an estimate whose LR signiÞcantly exceeds that of the true covariance matrix is reasonable. Based on these results, the expected likelihood I. INTRODUCTION (EL) principle was developed in [15]–[17] with successful he Gaussian assumption has been historically the domi- application to adaptive detection or direction of arrival (DoA) T nating framework for adaptive radar detection problems, estimation. In the former case, regularized estimation schemes partly because of the richness of statistical tools available were investigated with a view to drive down the LR to values to derive detection/estimation schemes and to assess their that are compliant with those for , the true underlying performance in Þnite sample problems. The most famous covariance matrix. As for DoA estimation, the EL approach examples include the celebrated Reed Mallet Brennan rule for was instrumental in identifying severely erroneous MUSIC DoA estimates (breakdown prediction) and rectifying the set of these estimates to meet the expected likelihood ratio values (breakdown cure) [15], [16]. However, in a number of applications, the Gaussian as- sumption may be violated and detection/estimation schemes based on this assumption may suffer from a certain lack of O. Besson is with the University of Toulouse, ISAE, Department Electronics robustness, resulting in signiÞcant performance degradation. Optronics Signal, 31055 Toulouse, France (e-mail: [email protected]). Therefore, many studies have focused on more accurate radar Y. I. Abramovich is with the W. R. Systems, Ltd., Fairfax, VA 22030 USA data modeling along with corresponding detection/estimation (e-mail: [email protected]). schemes. In this respect, the class of compound-Gaussian models, see e.g., [18]–[20], has been extensively studied. The radar return is here modeled as the product of a positive valued random variable (r.va.) called texture and an independent rive this likelihood ratio for under-sampled training conditions complex Gaussian random vector (r.v.) called speckle, and is in the case of complex ACG distributed data. For referred to as a spherically invariant random vector (SIRV). Gaussian distributed data, the under-sampled scenario has been Since exact knowledge of the p.d.f. of the texture is seldom studied in [30], [31] where the EL approach was used to detect available, the usual way is to treat the textures as unknown outliers produced by MUSIC DoA estimation, and in [32], [33] deterministic quantities and to carry out ML estimation of the for adaptive detection using regularized covariance matrix es- speckle covariance matrix [21]–[24]. This approach results timates. As explained in [30], this scenario requires a speciÞc in an implicit equation which is solved through an iterative analysis since (unstructured) maximum likelihood estimates do procedure. SIRV belong to a broader class, namely complex not longer exist, and information about the covariance matrix elliptically symmetric (CES) distributions [25], [26] which can be retrieved only in the -dimensional subspace spanned by have recently been studied for array processing applications, the data matrix. Moreover, in deriving an under-sampled like- see [27] and references therein. A CES distributed r.v. has lihood ratio , some requirements are in force. Of course, a stochastic representation of the form where should lie in the interval and maximization of the is the scatter matrix, is called the modular variate and likelihood ratio should be associated to maximization of the is independent of the complex random vector which is uni- likelihood function, at least over a restricted set. Additionally, formly distributed on the complex -sphere. In most practical the p.d.f. of , when evaluated at the true covariance ma- situations, the p.d.f. of is not known, and therefore there is trix, should depend only on and , so as to implement an an interest to estimate irrespective of it. A mechanism to EL approach. Finally, when , should coincide with achieve this goal is to normalize as whose p.d.f. its over-sampled counterpart. In the sequel, we build upon the is described by the complex angular central Gaussian (ACG) theory developed in [30] and extend it to the case of ACG dis- distribution and is speciÞed by the scatter matrix only. There tributions. is thus a growing interest in deriving scatter matrix estimates A vector is said to have a complex angular central Gaussian (SME) within the framework of CES or ACG distributions, (ACG) distribution, which we denote as , if see the comprehensive reviews of Esa Ollila et al. in [27] and it can be written as where follows a complex Ami Wiesel in [28]. In the Þrst part [29] of this series of pa- central Gaussian distribution, i.e., . For non- pers, we addressed this problem using the EL approach.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us